Rhetorical Strategies and Code-Mixing in TGB Zainul Majdi’s NWDI Anniversary Speech
Authors
-
Lalu Fakihuddin
Universitas Hamzanwadi
-
Muh Jaelani Al Pansori
Universitas Hamzanwadi
-
Herman Wijaya
Universitas Hamzanwadi
-
Muh. Irfan
Universitas Hamzanwadi
-
Titi Setiyoningsih
Universitas Sebelas Maret
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v6i2.5143Keywords:
Code-mixing, Rhetoric strategies, Religious discourse, Sociolinguistics, PragmaticsAbstract
Studies of religious speech have often focused on thematic content and textual meaning, while giving limited attention to the interplay between rhetorical strategies and code-mixing within a pragmatic discourse framework. This gap is especially evident in the speeches of locally rooted yet nationally influential religious figures such as TGB Zainul Majdi in Lombok. This study aims to identify the forms of code-mixing in TGB’s speech at the NWDI Hultah event, analyze the rhetorical strategies employed through ethos, pathos, and logos, and explain the social and communicative functions of these linguistic resources. The study employed a descriptive qualitative design using critical discourse analysis, supported by sociolinguistic and pragmatic perspectives. The data consisted of speech transcripts and contextual video documentation, collected through documentation and non-participatory observation and validated through source and theory triangulation. The analysis involved identifying code-mixing patterns, interpreting rhetorical strategies, and examining their communicative functions in context. The findings show that code-mixing among Arabic, Indonesian, and Sasak is strategic rather than incidental. The dominant forms are intrasentential and emblematic code-mixing, with occasional intersentential switching. Arabic reinforces sacred meaning and religious authority, Sasak strengthens cultural intimacy and local solidarity, and Indonesian serves as the main medium for broader message delivery. These linguistic choices support ethos, intensify pathos, and structure logos, making the discourse more persuasive, culturally resonant, and inclusive for multilingual audiences. This study highlights code-mixing as an important discursive resource in contemporary da'wah and contributes to the study of religious discourse, rhetoric, and multilingual communication.
Downloads
References
Ado, M. A., & Bidin, S. J. (2016). Sociopragmatics of code switching and code mixing in reconciliation case proceedings: Shariah Courts of Northern Nigeria. ASIAN TEFL: Journal of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.21462/asiantefl.v1i2.19
Anggian, L. A. S. (2023). Bahasa Arab di pesantren modern. Mahira: Journal of Arabic Studies, 3(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.55380/mahira.v3i1.501
Appel, R., & Muysken, P. (2015). Language contact and bilingualism. Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789053568576
Arens, E. (2011). Religion as communication. In D. Hook, B. Franks, & M. W. Bauer (Eds.), The social psychology of communication (pp. 249–265). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230297616_13
Auer, P. (2020). The pragmatics of code-switching: A sequential approach. In L. Wei (Ed.), The bilingualism reader (2nd ed., pp. 123–138). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003060406-14
Badara, A. (2018). Analisis wacana: Teori, metode, dan penerapannya pada wacana media. Prenada Media.
Bombelli, G. (2023). Aristotle’s model of rhetoric and contemporary patterns of argumentation: On some Aristotelian challenges. In Aristotle on truth, dialogue, justice and decision (pp. 153–175). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45485-1_9
Burke, M. (2023). Rhetoric and poetics: The classical heritage of stylistics. In The Routledge handbook of stylistics (pp. 11–31). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367568887-3
Chapp, C. B. (2012). Religious rhetoric and American politics: The endurance of civil religion in electoral campaigns. Cornell University Press.
Charland, M. (1987). Constitutive rhetoric: The case of the peuple Québécois. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 73(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638709383799
Conrad, R., & Hardenberg, R. (2020). Religious speech as resource: A research report. International Journal of Practical Theology, 24(1), 165–195. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijpt-2020-0041
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
Cumming, G., & Norwood, C. (2012). The community voice method: Using participatory research and filmmaking to foster dialog about changing landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105(4), 434–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.018
Dhia, R. N., Pramesthi, J. A., & Irwansyah, I. (2021). Analisis retorika Aristoteles pada kajian ilmiah media sosial dalam mempersuasi publik. Linimasa: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 4(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.23969/linimasa.v4i1.3530
Ernawati, T., & Wijaya, H. (2023). Dialog kebangsaan dalam Wasiat Renungan Massa: Kajian tindak tutur lokusi, ilokusi, dan perlokusi. ALINEA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 3(3), 652–664. https://doi.org/10.58218/alinea.v3i3.779
Fatoni, I., Gani, R. H. A., Supratmi, N., & Wijaya, H. (2022). Religiusitas dalam Wasiat Renungan Massa karya Hamzanwadi: Pendekatan pragmatik. ALINEA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 2(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.58218/alinea.v2i2.212
Ferguson, C. A. (2017). Sociolinguistic perspectives: Papers on language in society, 1959–1994. Oxford University Press.
Fishman, J. A. (1989). Language and ethnicity in minority sociolinguistic perspective. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800418066
Gani, R. H. A., Ernawati, T., & Wijaya, H. (2024). Pelanggaran maksim dan implikatur dalam percakapan Gojek online dengan pelanggan melalui WhatsApp: Kajian pragmatik. ALINEA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajaran, 4(2), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.58218/alinea.v4i2.951
Germanos, M.-A. (2023). Sociolinguistics of Arabic in the Middle East. In The Routledge handbook of sociolinguistics around the world (2nd ed., pp. 269–277). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003198345-25
Habibah, A., Syihabuddin, S., & Nurbayan, Y. (2022). Menumbuhkan cinta bahasa Arab dengan bi’ah ‘Arabiyyah di pondok pesantren. Arabi: Journal of Arabic Studies, 7(2), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.24865/ajas.v7i2.332
Kephart, J. (2024). Argumentation and rhetoric. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.1381
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE.
Muysken, P. (2000). Bilingual speech: A typology of code-mixing. Cambridge University Press.
Nahdi, K., Wijaya, H., & Irfan, M. (2025). Ontological continuity and processuality of NWDI Mars in hermeneutic perspective. Journal of Language, Literature, and Linguistic Research, 1(1), 14–29.
Nienkamp, J. (2001). Internal rhetorics: Toward a history and theory of self-persuasion. Southern Illinois University Press.
Quakenbush, S. J., & Simons, G. F. (Eds.). (2023). Language and identity in a multilingual, migrating world (Vol. 9). SIL International.
Razzaq, N. (2023). Language and religious discourse: An analysis of the linguistic features and persuasive strategies in Islamic sermons. ĪQĀN, 5(02), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.36755/iqan.v5i02.427
Romaine, S. (2002). Signs of identity, signs of discord: Glottal goofs and the green grocer’s glottal in debates on Hawaiian orthography. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 12(2), 189–224. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2002.12.2.189
Rukin, S. P. (2019). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Yayasan Ahmar Cendekia Indonesia.
Rumra, M. Y., & Hakis, H. (2023). Bahasa sebagai media komunikasi dakwah. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 13(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.15642/jik.2023.13.2.133-146
Schieffelin, B. B., Woolard, K. A., & Kroskrity, P. V. (Eds.). (1998). Language ideologies: Practice and theory (Vol. 16). Oxford University Press.
Sinaga, D. (2023). Buku ajar metodologi penelitian: Penelitian kualitatif.
Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Alfabeta.
Sya’bani, M. Z., & Has, Q. A. B. (2023). Relevansi bahasa Arab dalam dakwah: Refleksi atas kedudukan bahasa Arab sebagai bahasa Al-Qur’an: Tinjauan literatur. Ath-Thariq: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi, 7(1), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.32332/ath-thariq.v7i1.6532
Tannen, D. (2007). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse (2nd ed., Vol. 26). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618987
Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J. M. (2021). An introduction to sociolinguistics. John Wiley & Sons.
Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. SAGE.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lalu Fakihuddin, Muh Jaelani Al Pansori, Herman Wijaya, Muh. Irfan, Titi Setiyoningsih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JOLLS agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JOLLS, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors permit the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
