The Use of Total Physical Response in Teaching Vocabulary Integrated with Meaningful Classroom Interaction
Keywords:Total Physical Response, Teaching Vocabulary, Meaningful Classroom Interaction
The deep consideration in teaching vocabulary is promosing a deep level of processing that can involve either long-term or short-term memory. This study was aimed at investigating the use of total physical response in the teaching of vocabulary integrated with meaningful classroom interaction. To attain the research aim, this study employed classroom action research. The steps of classroom action consisted of Planning, Acting, Evaluating and Reflecting. In the planning phase, researchers prepared lesson plans in line with students’ vocabulary problems and mastery. The students’ vocabulary problems were determined on how their solutions were before applying it in the class. The phase of the Acting is the session of applying total physical response as learning activities to improve students’ vocabulary. The acting activities should be done in accordance with the previous plan prepared. The last but not least is evaluating and reflecting. It referred to the evaluation process since researchers applied the learning strategies in the class. The upcoming process is then reflection, and it is emphasized on whether the learning plans are on the track. This study was carried out in middle schools. The sample was chosen by using purposive sampling technique. 37 students in the eleventh-grade class were involved in this study. The successful criteria were enacted in 75, and the indicators covered expanding word knowledge, adding specific words, word-learning strategies, and word-play activities. Based on the analysis result, students were able to conduct various learning activities to improve wide and extensive independent reading activities to expand their word acquisition and knowledge; students were able to perform meaningful strategies relating to specific words to improve their comprehension of texts containing those words; students were able to perform word-play activities to improve learning atmospheres in the class. Therefore, it can be concluded that the use of total physical response was able to improve students’ vocabulary mastery in integration with meaningful classroom interaction. The implementation of this strategy with paying attention to classroom interaction is strongly recommended to be applied for other language elements.
Alamri, K., & Rogers, V. (2018). The effectiveness of different explicit vocabulary-teaching strategies on learners’ retention of technical and academic words. Language Learning Journal, 46(5), 622–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2018.1503139
Alfatihah, D. F. N., & Tyas, P. A. (2022). The Correlation Between Undergraduate-Students’ Reading Interest and Their Reading Comprehension. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 10(3), 343. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v10i3.5460
Arndt, H. L., & Woore, R. (2018). Vocabulary learning from watching YouTube videos and reading blog posts. Language Learning, 22(1), 124–142. https://doi.org/10125/44660
Augustyn, P. (2013). Translation and Bilingual Practice for German Vocabulary Teaching and Learning. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 46(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/tger.10127
Bowers, P. N., & Kirby, J. R. (2010). Effects of morphological instruction on vocabulary acquisition. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 515–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9172-z
Castillo, L., & Alto, S. C. (2018). the Impact of Using Pixton for Teaching Grammar and Vocabulary. Teaching English with Technology, 18(1), 53–76.
Clarke, D. C. (2018). Student responses to vocabulary learning strategies on an ESAP course. ELT Journal, 72(3), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy001
Chiew, A., Leong, H., Jafre, M., Abidin, Z., & Saibon, J. (2019). Learners’ Perceptions of the Impact of Using Digital Storytelling on Vocabulary Learning. Teaching English with Technology, 19(4), 3–26. http://www.tewtjournal.org
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th Edition). New York: Routledge.
Dubiner, D. (2017). Using vocabulary notebooks for vocabulary acquisition and teaching. ELT Journal, 71(4), 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx008
Ebadi, S., & Bashiri, S. (2018). Investigating EFL Learners’ Perspectives on Vocabulary Learning Experiences Through Smartphone Applications. Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 126–151.
Firdaus, M., & Mayasari, S. (2022). Schoology-Aided Instruction: Measuring the Effectiveness for Student-Teachers’ Reading Comprehension Achievement. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 10(3), 380. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v10i3.5311
Haerazi, H., Prayti, Z., & Vikasari, R. M. (2019). Practicing contextual teaching and learning (CTL) approach to improve students’ reading comprehension in relation to motivation. ENGLISH REVIEW: Journal of English Education, 8(1), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v8i1.2011.Received
Ihsan, P., & Syafitri, A. T. (2021). The Father’s Storytelling Approach in Improving Children’s Vocabulary Using Anime. Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa & Seni Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP, 8(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v8i1.3790
Indrasari, A., Novita, D., & Megawati, F. (2018). Big Book: Attractive Media for Teaching Vocabulary to Lower Class of Young Learners. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 3(2), 141. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v3i2.1572
Joyce, P. (2018). L2 vocabulary learning and testing: the use of L1 translation versus L2 definition. Language Learning Journal, 46(3), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2015.1028088
Kalogirou, K., Beauchamp, G., & Whyte, S. (2019). Vocabulary Acquisition via Drama: Welsh as a second language in the primary school setting. Language Learning Journal, 47(3), 332–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2017.1283351
Khan, R., Radzuan, N., Shahbaz, M., Ibrahim, A., & Mustafa, G. (2018). The Role of Vocabulary Knowledge in Speaking Development of Saudi EFL Learners. Arab World English Journal, 9(1), 406–418. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no1.28
Kho, S. F.-C., Ramanair, J., & Pandian, A. (2021). Students’ Vocabulary Learning Strategies of Discovery and Consolidation in Malaysian Primary School English Language Classrooms. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.2.33
Kinasih, P. R., & Olivia, O. (2022). An Analysis of Using Movies to Enhance Students’ Public Speaking Skills in Online Class. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 10(3), 315. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v10i3.5435
Kusmayanti, I. N., & Hendryanti, R. (2021). Square Talks®: A Mobile App to Support EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Development. Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa & Seni Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP, 8(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v8i2.4393
Lee, K., & Chen, X. (2019). An emergent interaction between reading fluency and vocabulary in the prediction of reading comprehension among French immersion elementary students. Reading and Writing, 32(7), 1657–1679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9920-z
Montero Perez, M. (2019). Pre-learning vocabulary before viewing captioned video: an eye-tracking study. Language Learning Journal, 47(4), 460–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1638623
Mustafa, F., Assiry, S. N., Bustari, A., & Nuryasmin, R. A. (2019). The role of vocabulary e-learning: Comparing the effect of reading skill training with and without vocabulary homework. Teaching English with Technology, 19(2), 21–43.
Naddumba, A., & Athiemoolam, L. (2022). Teachers’ Pedagogical Practices to Support Learners’ Functional Literacy Development: The Context of Mother Tongue Language. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 10(3), 329. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v10i3.5499
Nation, I. (2006). How Large a Vocabulary is Needed for Reading and Listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59
Nayan, S., & Krishnasamy, H. N. (2015). A Preliminary Study on Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used by the Students from the Faculty of Accountancy. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 1(1), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJLLL.2015.V1.3
Uchihara, T., & Saito, K. (2019). Exploring the relationship between productive vocabulary knowledge and second language oral ability. Language Learning Journal, 47(1), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1191527
Puimège, E., & Peters, E. (2019). Learning L2 vocabulary from audiovisual input: an exploratory study into incidental learning of single words and formulaic sequences. Language Learning Journal, 47(4), 424–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1638630
Rassaei, E. (2018). Computer-mediated textual and audio glosses, perceptual style and L2 vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 22(6), 657–675. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817690183
Setianingsih, T., Rosihan, M., & Pardani, S. (2018). The use of mind mapping to improve motivation in learning vocabulary of second grade students at MTs NW Mispalah Praya. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 6(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v6i2.1264
Terai, M., Yamashita, J., & Pasich, K. E. (2021). Effects of Learning Direction in Retrieval Practice on EFL Vocabulary Learning–Erratum. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(5), 1173–1173. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000802
van den Bosch, L. J., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2019). The Role of Linguistic Diversity in the Prediction of Early Reading Comprehension: A Quantile Regression Approach. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(3), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1509864
Wyra, M., & Lawson, M. J. (2018). Foreign language vocabulary learning using the keyword method: strategy and meta-strategy knowledge. Language Learning Journal, 46(5), 605–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2018.1503138
Zhong, H. F. (2018). The relationship between receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge: a perspective from vocabulary use in sentence writing. Language Learning Journal, 46(4), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2015.1127403
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Baiq Sumarni, Dharma Dev Bhatta, Sharon Fung-Chien Kho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JoLLS agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JoLLS, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.