Development of the Nganjuk Regency Legal Documentation and Information Network (JDIH) Based on Co-Creation within the New Public Governance Paradigm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/5qqznm66Keywords:
JDIH, Co-creation, governance Network, NPGAbstract
The digital transformation of government and strengthening public information disclosure policies have encouraged local governments to develop legal information services that are transparent, participatory and responsive. However, nationally, the achievement of information openness still faces challenges, as reflected in the 2025 Public Information Openness Index (IKIP) value of 66.43, down 9.22 points compared to 2024 of 75.65. This condition shows that information disclosure, especially legal information services at the regional level, has not been effectively institutionalized. One of the instruments used is the Legal Documentation and Information Network (JDIH), although its management is still administrative and focuses on providing legal documents. This research aims to analyze the development of JDIH Nganjuk Regency based on co-creation within the New Public Governance (NPG) framework. A qualitative approach was used with a case study design through in-depth interviews, observations and documentation studies which were analyzed thematically and interpretively. The research results show that although JDIH Nganjuk Regency has run well administratively and received institutional recognition, management is still government centric and has not provided meaningful participation space for the community. The main principles of NPG, especially governance networks and co-creation, have not been systematically institutionalized due to institutional limitations, low public legal literacy, and the unavailability of clear participation mechanisms. The conclusion of this research confirms that the development of JDIH based on co-creation in the NPG paradigm is a strategic need in improving legal information services and strengthening the legitimacy of regional policies, which requires support by strengthening governance networks, increasing management capacity, and sustainable participatory development
References
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt2204s7w.11
Ebneyamini, S., & Sadeghi Moghadam, M. R. (2018). Toward developing a framework for conducting case study research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918817954
Ehrler, F. (2012). New public governance and activation. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32(5), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443331211237023
Harrison, H., Birks, M., Franklin, R., & Mills, J. (2017). Case study research: Foundations and methodological orientations. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18(1).
Keputusan Bupati Nganjuk Nomor 188/115/K/411.013/2022 tentang Pembentukan Tim Pengelola Jaringan Dokumentasi dan Informasi Hukum Kabupaten Nganjuk. (2022).
Klijn, E. H., et al. (2025). Governance networks in the public sector (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50386-8_4
Lejau, R., Utomo, H. S., & Rande, S. (2022). Evaluasi website Jaringan Dokumentasi dan Informasi Hukum (JDIH) dalam keterbukaan informasi publik (Studi pada Bagian Hukum Sekretariat Daerah Kabupaten Mahakam Ulu). Jurnal Paradigma, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.30872/jp.v11i1.7238
Mandeli, K. N. (2016). New public governance in Saudi cities: An empirical assessment of the quality of the municipal system in Jeddah. Habitat International, 51, 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.10.020
Mulyono, Z. T., & Utami, R. T. (2019). Optimalisasi Jaringan Dokumentasi dan Informasi Hukum guna mewujudkan good governance sektor layanan publik. Administrative Law & Governance Journal (ALGI), 2(4), 733.
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 33 Tahun 2012 tentang Jaringan Dokumentasi dan Informasi Hukum Nasional. (2012).
Petunjuk teknis penilaian pengelola Jaringan Dokumentasi dan Informasi Hukum (JDIH), Pub. L. No. PHN.HN.03.05.87, 14. (2023).
Pihlajamaa, M., Merisalo, M., & Saari, P. (2025). Preparing a social impact bond in a Nordic welfare state: Governance challenges and hybrid responses. Journal of Public Procurement, 327770. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-10-2023-0074
Popeda, & Hadasik. (2024). New public governance as a new wave of public policy: Theoretical approach and conceptualization of the trend. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEPP-09-2023-0089
Pramono, D. (2015). Penyelenggaraan Jaringan Dokumentasi Informasi Hukum (JDIH) online: Evaluasi situs web pemerintah daerah di Provinsi Jawa Timur. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 1(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2015.001.01.5
Putra, R. R., & Ariesmansyah, A. (2023). Inovasi sektor publik dalam pengelolaan JDIH (Jaringan Dokumentasi dan Informasi Hukum) di Bagian Hukum Sekretariat Daerah Kabupaten Sumedang. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 21(2), 47–56. http://jurnaldialektika.com/
Rønshaugen, M., Sønderskov, M., & Magnussen, S. F. (2024). Bureaucracies’ extended arm in co-creation: A study of institutional complexity in the context of public services. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 28(3), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.2024.23233
Simorangkir, T. (2018). Penyediaan database hukum nasional mendukung reformasi hukum jilid II: Peran JDIHN. Majalah Hukum Nasional, 1, 18.
Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., & Breimo, J. P. (2023). When Norway met co-creation: The import, diffusion, and onboarding of a magic concept in public administration. International Public Management Journal, 26(5), 667–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2022.2128127
Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review.
Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., Flemig, S., Timeus, K., Tõnurist, P., & Tummers, L. (2017). Does co-creation impact public service delivery? The importance of state and governance traditions. Public Money & Management, 37(5), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2017.1328798
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dwi Mariyanti, Bintoro Wardiyanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
