Peer-Reviewer
Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika | Journal Information
Reviewer Board
The reviewer board comprises scholars from Indonesian and international institutions who contribute disciplinary perspectives to the journal's peer-review activities. The directory provides institutional affiliations and available academic profile links.
- Reviewer directory
- International participation
- Scholarly profiles
- Double-anonymous peer review
Reviewer Directory
Reviewer profiles presented using the same directory layout as the Editorial Board.
Reviewer Responsibilities and Editorial Independence
How reviewer expertise, confidentiality, and independence support manuscript evaluation.
e-Saintika | Reviewer Information
Reviewer Selection and Ethical Responsibilities
Reviewers are invited to evaluate manuscripts on the basis of relevant subject expertise, availability, and their ability to provide an objective assessment. Listing in the reviewer directory does not imply that every listed scholar evaluates every manuscript or that all listed scholars have reviewed an article during a particular period.
Peer review follows the journal's double-anonymous procedure. Reviewers are expected to maintain confidentiality, declare relevant conflicts of interest, provide constructive and evidence-based evaluations, and respect the editorial independence of manuscript decisions. Editors remain responsible for editorial decisions.
For details, please consult the Peer Review Process and the Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement.



















