Development of the KAI Model (Collaborative, Adaptive, Individual) to Improve Elementary School Students’ Literacy
Downloads
How to Cite
This study developed the KAI Model, an instructional innovation integrating collaborative, adaptive, and individual learning to improve literacy instruction at SD Negeri Balai Riam. The study was motivated by classroom conditions in which literacy learning remained largely teacher-centered, learning strategies were limited, and students showed varied reading abilities. Using a Research and Development design with the 4D model consisting of define, design, develop, and disseminate stages, this study produced a literacy learning model, teaching module, student worksheets, and assessment instruments for Grade IV Indonesian language learning. Data were collected through observation, interviews, expert validation, teacher and student responses, and pretest-posttest assessment. The results show that the KAI Model was highly feasible, with expert validation scores of 90% for media feasibility, 100% for material feasibility, 83.3% for language feasibility, and an overall average of 91.1%. Classroom implementation indicated that the model could be applied systematically through orientation, collaborative text discussion, adaptive task differentiation, individual literacy work, and reflection. The model also received positive responses from teachers and students because it encouraged active participation, peer discussion, motivation, and independent learning. Its effectiveness was demonstrated by an increase in students’ average literacy score from 55.7 in the pretest to 77.2 in the posttest, with a moderate N-Gain of approximately 0.49. These findings indicate that the KAI Model is valid, practical, and effective as a contextual literacy learning model for elementary schools.
Astarina, R., Yerizon, Y., Bentri, A., & Zainil, M. (2024). Development of interactive learning media assisted by Google Sites in building materials for elementary schools grade V. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(SpecialIssue), 226–233. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10ispecialissue.8555
Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (2003). Educational research: An introduction. Longman.
Bourgoin, R., & Bouthillier, J. L. (2021). Task-based language learning and beginning language learners: Examining classroom-based small group learning in Grade 1 French immersion. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 70–98. https://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2021.31378
Carlisle, J. F., Kelcey, B., & Berebitsky, D. (2013). Teachers’ support of students’ vocabulary learning during literacy instruction in high poverty elementary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 50(6), 1360–1391. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213492844
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Deane, P., Sabatini, J., Feng, G., Sparks, J. R., Yi, S., Fowles, M. E., O’Reilly, T., Jueds, K., Krovetz, R., & Foley, C. (2015). Key practices in the English language arts (ELA): Linking learning theory, assessment, and instruction. ETS Research Report Series, 2015(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12063
Dorris, C., Winter, K., O’Hare, L., & Lwoga, E. T. (2024). Mobile device use in the primary school classroom and impact on pupil literacy and numeracy attainment: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1417
Drew, S. V., & Thomas, J. (2021). Reframing literacy in the discipline of science with the disciplinary literacy observation tool (DLOT). Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 37(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12270
Eutsler, L., & Perez, A. (2022). Culturally relevant model for digital language and literacy instruction. Language and Literacy, 24(2), 107–132. https://doi.org/10.20360/langandlit29576
Fitria, T. N. (2023). Understanding basic literacy and information literacy for primary students. Journal of Contemporary Issue in Elementary Education, 1(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.33830/jciee.v1i2.6181
Gillam, S. L., Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., Capin, P., Fall, A., Israelsen-Augenstein, M., Holbrook, S., Wada, R., Hancock, A., Fox, C., Dille, J., Magimairaj, B. M., & Gillam, R. B. (2022). Improving oral and written narration and reading comprehension of children at-risk for language and literacy difficulties: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000766
Goldman, S. R., Snow, C. E., & Vaughn, S. (2016). Common themes in teaching reading for understanding: Lessons from three projects. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60(3), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.586
Greenleaf, C., Litman, C., Hanson, T., Rosen, R., Boscardin, C., Herman, J. L., Schneider, S., Madden, S., & Jones, B. (2011). Integrating literacy and science in biology. American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 647–717. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210384839
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Halik, A., Salam, R., Rukayah, R., & Hafid, A. (2023). The analysis of the educators’ role towards the elementary school students’ literacy problem through the heutagogy approach. Retorika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v15i2.47164
Istiq’faroh, N., Wibowo, A. H., Lestari, W. M., Murni, A. W., & Mahsunah, E. (2022). Strengthening school literature movement in elementary school during the Covid-19 pandemic. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(3), 3903–3914. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.1132
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
Kim, J. S., Burkhauser, M., Mesite, L., Asher, C. A., Relyea, J. E., Fitzgerald, J., & Elmore, J. (2021). Improving reading comprehension, science domain knowledge, and reading engagement through a first-grade content literacy intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000465
Kosh, A. E., Greene, J. A., Murphy, P. K., Burdick, H. O., Firetto, C. M., & Elmore, J. (2017). Automated scoring of students’ small-group discussions to assess reading ability. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(2), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12174
Larsari, V. N., & Abouabdelkader, H. (2024). An investigation into flipped learning classroom (FLC) of EFL sixth grade students’ grammar literacy development: Implications for student-centered approach. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 12(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.12n.1p.13
Lee, R., & Al‐Adeimi, S. (2025). Supporting literacy through the Justice and Dialogic Education (JADE) framework. Reading Research Quarterly, 60(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.70062
Mufidah, I., Harsiati, T., & Nurchasanah. (2023). Progress in International Reading Literacy Study-based reading competency assessment instrument with culturally educative texts for primary school students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(SpecialIssue), 677–685. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9ispecialissue.5993
MZ, A. S. A., Aprillya, M. R., & Bianto, M. A. (2022). Science augmented reality program media for elementary school students. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 11(3), 457–465. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v11i3.41378
Nadifa, M., & Zulvani, N. V. (2024). School literacy policy as an effort to strengthen 21st-century skills. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development, 5(1), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v5i1.3527
Nurcahyoko, K., Anniurwanda, P., & Sudirjo, E. (2024). Investigating the factors influencing literacy skills among young students in rural areas of Indonesia. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 18(2), 333–341. https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v18i2.50287
Outlaw, J. K., & Grifenhagen, J. F. (2024). Theorizing digital dialogic comprehension pedagogy with rural primary teachers: A relational praxis of knowledge, space, and time. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 73(1), 280–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/23813377241289994
Park, J. C. (2021). Cultivating STEAM literacy: Emphasizing the implementation of the arts through reading practices supporting the Asian diaspora. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 7(2), 586–614. https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10034
Pereira, J., Tan, S., Li, L., & Purnama, A. (2020). Developing a mathematics learning media to explain formula of area of kite using Hawgent. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(3), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v3i3.7391
Prihartini, A. A., Ali, N. B., & Fitri, H. A. (2023). The role of school literacy movement (SLM) in increasing student interest in reading: A literature review. Jurnal Tatsqif, 21(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v21i1.7409
Rahayu, W., Suyono, S., Dewi, R. S. I., & Arifin, S. (2024). Implementation of the GELIS program in the school literacy movement at elementary school. JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 26(1), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v26i1.43680
Rahmi, I. A., Santi, A. N., Ramadhan, S., & Sukma, E. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions of literacy implementation in elementary schools. Lectura: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(1), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.31849/lectura.v15i1.18153
Reigeluth, C. M. (2013). Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Routledge.
Relyea, J. E., Davis, D. S., Dawson, S. D., & Dobis, C. (2024a). Elementary school teachers’ enactment of a content literacy curriculum in a virtual tutoring program for multilingual students. Education Sciences, 14(7), 788. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070788
Relyea, J. E., Kim, J. S., Rich, P., & Fitzgerald, J. (2024b). Effects of tier 1 content literacy intervention on early-grade English learners’ reading and writing: Exploring the mediating roles of domain-specific vocabulary and oral language proficiency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(7), 1172–1195. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000882
Romero, M. E., Burns, M. K., Wan, H. T., Abdelnaby, H., & Crawford, T. J. (2025). A meta-analysis on the effects of peer tutoring on emergent bilinguals’ academic achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 62(6), 1953–1965. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23443
Sabatini, J., Graesser, A. C., Hollander, J., & O’Reilly, T. (2023). A framework of literacy development and how AI can transform theory and practice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1174–1203. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13342
Safitri, I. (2024). Exploring the utilization of folktales as reading materials for EFL students. Journal of English as a Foreign Language Education, 4(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.26418/jefle.v4i2.74899
Sparapani, N., Carlisle, J. F., & Connor, C. M. (2018). Observations of vocabulary activities during second- and third-grade reading lessons. Education Sciences, 8(4), 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040198
Steinke, K., & Wildsmith-Cromarty, R. (2019). Securing the FORT: Capturing reading pedagogy in the foundation phase. Per Linguam, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.5785/35-3-806
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suhardiman, A., Liastamin, A., Alambana, B. M., & Kurniawansyah, E. (2024). Implementation of Kampus Mengajar 4 program to equalize the quality of basic education at First Sekunyit Public Elementary School. Progres Pendidikan, 5(1), 88–92. https://doi.org/10.29303/prospek.v5i1.660
Sumarno, W. K., Riyantoko, P. A., & Shodikin, A. (2024). Effectiveness of bilingual project-based materials to facilitate literacy and numeracy teaching. TEM Journal, 68–76. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem131-07
Suprapto, I., Amriyah, C., & Prihatmojo, A. (2024). Blended learning in an effort to overcome learning materials in elementary schools. Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education, 8(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v8i1.447
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. Indiana University.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Triwahyuningtyas, D., Mahmuda, N. E., & Yulianti, Y. (2020). Developing module for two-dimensional course based on ethnomathematics for fourth grade of elementary school student. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 7(2), 166. https://doi.org/10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v7i2.6314
Ulpiah, U., Rohmah, S., & Saefudin, A. (2022). Implementation of school literacy movement in Islamic Primary School Al Istiqomah. Al-Aulad: Journal of Islamic Primary Education, 5(2), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.15575/al-aulad.v5i2.21166
Wahyuni, D. (2023). The effect of language literacy and numerical literacy on the result of the Minimum Competency Assessment (AKM) of SMAN Ploso Jombang. Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 4(1), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v4i1.315
Wijaya, B. A., Wantini, W., Perawironegoro, D., & Bustam, B. M. R. (2024). The impact of differentiated learning in the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum on elementary school literacy as the object of the Kampus Mengajar program. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 8(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v8i1.68107
Yustisia, K. K., & Salsabila, D. L. E. (2023). Reading difficulties among elementary students in a rural area: A qualitative study. EnJourMe: English Journal of Merdeka, 8(1), 106–112. https://doi.org/10.26905/enjourme.v8i1.10733
Zuo, X., & Ives, D. (2023). Technology-assisted reading instruction for English language learners: A methodological review. ECNU Review of Education, 7(2), 258–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311231179490
Copyright (c) 2026 Caecillia Supraptini, Chandra Anugrah Putra, Hendri Hendri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
