Unveiling the Impact of Drawing on Digestive System Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v8i2.1371Keywords:
Drawing, Teaching and learning strategy, Action research, Primary science, Digestive systemAbstract
Science education plays a vital role in primary schools, and it is important to improve its quality through innovative teaching and learning methods. This study examines the use of drawing as a strategy to enhance learning about the Digestive System in Year 4 students. The research follows an action research approach, involving one cycle of identifying the problem, implementing the action plan, collecting and analyzing data, and evaluating the outcomes. The participants in this study were 19 students from Mawar Primary School in Brunei Darussalam. Both quantitative (pre- and post-tests) and qualitative (interviews and observations) data were collected and analyzed to assess the effectiveness of the drawing intervention. The findings indicate a positive impact of using drawing as a teaching and learning strategy. However, it should be noted that these results cannot be generalized to all schools.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, M., & Osman, K. (2010). Scientific inventive thinking skills among primary students in Brunei. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(2), 294–301.
Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333(1), 1096–1097.
Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature and Languages, 1(1), 9–16.
Azman, A. N., & Johari, M. (2022). Investigating the effectiveness of videos designed using cognitive load theory on biology students’ academic achievement. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(3), 461–468.
Babakr, Z. H., Mohamedamin, P., & Kakamad, K. (2019). Piaget’s cognitive developmental theory: Critical review. Education Quarterly Reviews, 2(3), 517–524.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Brooks, M. (2009). What Vygotsky can teach us about young children drawing. International Art in Early Childhood Research Journal, 1(1), 1–13.
Cardak, O. (2015). Student science teachers’ ideas of the digestive system. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(5), 127–133.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge Academic.
Denskus, T. (2008). Review: Ernest T. Stringer (2007). Action research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(1).
Dimitrov, D. M., & Rumrill, P. D. (2003). Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change. Work, 20(2), 159–165.
Erduran, S., & Kaya, E. (2018). Drawing nature of science in pre-service science teacher education: Epistemic insight through visual representations. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1133–1149.
Fernandes, M. A., Wammes, J. D., & Meade, M. E. (2018). The surprisingly powerful influence of drawing on memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(5), 302–308.
Gerschler, J. (2012). Classroom strategies for maintaining student focus. Oaxaca, Mexico: Oaxaca State University System ESL Conference.
Grapin, S. (2019). Multimodality in the new content standards era: Implications for English learners. TESOL Q, 53(1), 30–55.
Hayes, D., Symington, D., & Martin, M. (1994). Drawing during science activity in the primary school. International Journal of Science Education, 16(3), 265–277.
Hinton, P. R., Brownlow, C., McMurray, I., & Cozens, B. (2004). SPSS explained. London and New York: Routledge.
Hong, S. B., Broderick, J. T., & McAuliffe, C. M. (2021). Drawing to learn: A classroom case study. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49, 15¬–25.
Hope, G. (2008). Thinking and learning through drawing: In primary classrooms. Sage Publications.
Hsieh, W.-M., & Tsai, C. C. (2017). Exploring students’ conceptions of science learning via drawing: A cross-sectional analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 39(3), 274–298.
Jaidin, J. H. (2009). Conceptions of learning held by upper primary children in government schools in Brunei Darussalam. Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation. Queensland University of Technology.
Johari, M., Said, H., & Roslan, R. (2023). Secondary teacher candidates’ perceptions and experiences before, during, and after conducting a science show. International Journal of Social Learning, 3(2), 234–246.
Kantrowitz, A., Fava, M., & Brew, A. (2017). Drawing together research and pedagogy. Art Education, 70(3), 50–60.
Katz, P. (2017). Drawing is a human expression for teaching/learning. In P. Katz (Ed.), Drawing for Science Education (pp. 1–8). Sense Publishers.
Khan, G. -A., Ishrat, N., & Khan, A. Q. (2015). Using item analysis on essay types questions given in summative examination of medical college students: Facility value, discrimination index. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 3(1), 178– 182.
Kress, G. R., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2014). Multimodal teaching and learning (1st ed.). Bloomsbury.
Kubat, U., & Dedebali, N. C. (2018). Opinions of science teachers for classroom management. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 5(2), 110–117.
Laronde, G., & MacLeod, K. (2012). Modeling various teaching methods in a faculty of education in science education: Chalk and talk, virtual labs or hovercrafts. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 9(2), 107–114.
Leech, B. L. (2002). Asking questions: Techniques for semistructured interviews. PS: Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 665–668.
Lindorff, A., & Sammons, P. (2018). Going beyond structured observations: Looking at classroom practice through a mixed method lens. ZDM Mathematics Education, 50(3), 521–534.
Maranan, V. M. (2017). Basic process skills and attitude toward science: Inputs to an enhanced students’ cognitive performance. Unpublished Master Thesis. Laguna State Polytechnic University.
Matamit, H. N. H., Roslan, R., Shahrill, M., & Said, H. (2020). Teaching challenges on the use of storytelling in elementary science lessons. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(3), 716¬–722.
McDermott, M. (2010). Using multimodal writing tasks in the science classroom. The Science Teacher, 77(1), 32–36.
Mertler, C. A. (2014). Action research: Improving schools and empowering educators. SAGE Publications.
Ministry of Education. (2013). The National Education System for 21st Century SPN21 (2nd ed.). Bandar Seri Begawan: Ministry of Education. http://www.moe.gov.bn/spn21dl/SPN21 ENG (2013) COMPLETE.pdf
Morsid, N. A., Salleh, S. M., & Shahrill, M. (2020). Students’ conceptions of learning using animations. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 8(2), 319–334.
Mvududu, N. H., & Thiel-Burgess, J. (2012). Constructivism in practice: The case for English Language learners. International Journal of Education, 4(3), 108–118.
Naim, S. A. (2017). Drawing in science lesson: Investigating the use of drawings in teaching and learning “Animals with backbones” in a Year 5 Science class. Unpublished Master Research Exercise Report. Universiti Brunei Darussalam.
Nasrollahi, M. A. (2015). A closer look at using Stringer’s action research model in improving students’ learning. International Journal of Current Research, 7(7), 18663– 18668.
Nugraha, I. (2018). The use of drawing as an alternative assessment tool in biology teaching. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1).
Olympiou, G., Zacharias, Z., & DeJong, T. (2013). Making the invisible visible: Enhancing students’ conceptual understanding by introducing representations of abstract objects in a simulation. Instructional Science, 41, 575–596.
Papandreou, M. (2014). Communicating and thinking through drawing activity in early childhood. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 28(1), 85–100.
Paul, A., Lim, A., Salleh, S. M., & Shahrill, M. (2019). Enhanced learning through analogy in the teaching of cardiovascular system. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(2), 176–186.
Phoon, H. –Y., Roslan, R., Shahrill, M., & Said, H. (2020). The role of comics in elementary school science education. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 10(2), 67–76.
Punzalan, J. F. (2018). The impact of visual arts in students’ academic performance. International Journal of Education and Research, 6(7), 121–130.
Quillin, K., & Thomas, S. (2015). Drawing-to-Learn: A framework for using drawings to promote model-based reasoning in biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 14(1).
Roberd, A., & Roslan, R. (2022). Social media and primary school science: Examining the impact of TikTok on year 5 students' performance in light energy. International Journal of Social Learning (IJSL), 2(3), 366–378.
Roslan, R., Panjang, M., Yusof, N., & Shahrill, M. (2018). Teacher’s feedback in teaching science in a bilingual Bruneian primary classroom. On the Horizon, 26(2), 122–136.
Sabol, F. R. (2014). A study of the impact of arts education on the educational performances of students in Indiana public secondary schools and institutions of higher education pilot study report, 1–124.
Scheiter, K., Schleinschok, K., & Ainsworth, S. (2017). Why sketching may aid learning from science texts: Contrasting sketching with written explanations. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(4), 866–882.
Schmidgall, S. P., Eitel, A., & Scheiter, K. (2019). Why do learners who draw perform well? Investigating the role of visualization, generation and externalization in learner-generated drawing. Learning and Instruction, 60, 138–153.
Skutil, M., Havlí?ková, K., & Mat?jí?ková, R. (2016). Teaching methods in primary education from the teacher’s point of view. In ERPA International Congresses on Education 2015, ERPA Congresses 2015. Elsevier Ltd.
Talib, J., Mohamed Taha, N., & Jailani, M. A. (2018). Orang Asli children’s drawing: A window to their minds. Asian Journal of Social Science Research, 1(2).
Tang, K. S., & Danielsson, K. (Eds.). (2018). Global developments in literacy research for science education (pp. 1-11). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55.
Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. New York: NY: Plenum Press.
Wu, L. Y. (2015). Thinking and concepts: Vygotsky’s theory of child concept formation. Review of Global Management and Service Science, 5.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nurafiqah Haji Abd Malek, Jainatul Halida Jaidin, Masitah Shahrill, Rosmawijah Jawawi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
