Inventive Ways of Teaching Mechanical Systems and Control to Grade 9 Learners with Special Learning Needs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v8i1.1424Keywords:
Special needs, technology learners, Mechanical systems and controlAbstract
Mechanical systems and control are part of the Technology subject strand, which involves gaining knowledge and skills in using various machinery and mechanisms such as gears, belts, chains, elevators, and escalators. Technology teachers need to be familiar with innovative teaching methods for instructing learners with special needs. This study aimed to explore creative teaching strategies for teaching Mechanical Systems and Control to grade 9 learners with special needs in the Capricorn district of Limpopo. A qualitative exploratory case study design and homogenous purposive sampling were employed to select two Technology teachers from two special schools in the Capricorn district. The findings of this study revealed that technology teachers encountered significant challenges in identifying and implementing appropriate creative teaching strategies to deliver the content of Mechanical Systems and Control effectively to learners with special learning needs. The study also indicated that although Technology teachers utilized PowerPoint presentations, narrative discourses, textbooks, and artifacts during instruction, these strategies were not always effective for learners with special learning needs. Consequently, the study recommends that teachers receive comprehensive training on teaching learners with special learning needs, focusing on different pedagogies and methods such as the guided exploration method, technology integration, visualization, and the use of technological artifacts to enhance instruction in Mechanical Systems and Control. These learner-centered methods enable teachers to cater to learners' individual learning needs.
Downloads
References
Aas, H. K., Uthus, M., & Løhre, A. (2024). Inclusive education for students with challenging behaviour: Development of teachers’ beliefs and ideas for adaptations through Lesson Study. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 39(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2023.2191107
Ashipala, D. O., Elias, S., & Lifalaza, A. (2023). Nursing students’ experiences of utilizing a concept map as a learning method in human anatomy and physiology: A qualitative descriptive study. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, 18, 100547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2023.100547
Asma, N. (2021). Using a smartphone video camera to reduce anxiety in speaking activity. English Education Journal, 12(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.24815/eej.v12i1.19078
Baas, M., Van Der Rijst, R., Huizinga, T., Van Den Berg, E., & Admiraal, W. (2022). Would you use them? A qualitative study on teachers’ assessments of open educational resources in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 54, 100857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100857
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE.
Department of Basic Education. (2014). Curriculum Assessment Policy Statements. Department of Basic Education. https://www.education.gov.za/Curriculum/CurriculumAssessmentPolicyStatements(CAPS).aspx
Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
Greenier, V., Fathi, J., & Behzadpoor, S.-F. (2023). Teaching for creativity in an EFL context: The predictive roles of school climate, teaching enthusiasm, and metacognition. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 50, 101419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101419
Hlophe, N. E. (2020). An exploration of teachers experiences of teaching special needs learners in pre-vocational school. [Master Thesis, University of KwaZulu Natal]. https://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za/handle/10413/20319
Hollweck, T. (2015). Robert K. Yin. (2014). Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th ed.). Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 30(1), 108–110. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.30.1.108
Kim, S. (2018). Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) and Beliefs of Preservice Secondary Mathematics Teachers: Examining the Relationships. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93179
Mabasa, K., Mtshali, T., Makgato, M., & Skosana, N. (2023). Do we have a master plan to prevent the extinction of Civil Technology woodwork specialization in south african schools? PONTE International Scientific Researchs Journal, 79(8), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.21506/j.ponte.2023.8.5
Makgato, M. (2014). The Challenges of Teaching and Learning Technology Subject at Schools in South Africa: A Case of INSET Teachers in Mpumalanga Province. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3688–3692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.824
Mathabata, L. N., Kola, M. I., & Mtshali, T. I. (2023). Simulations for junior engineering and technology students: Teachers’ ability to use design process to promote psychomotor skills. Nigerian Journal of Technology, 41(6), 930–939. https://doi.org/10.4314/njt.v41i6.2
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2014). Educational Research: Evidence-Based Inquiry. Pearson Education, Inc. https://www.pearson.com/en-us/subject-catalog/p/educational-research-fundamental-principles-and-methods/P200000001485/9780135770146?tab=title-overview
Moila, O., Mji, A., & Simelane-Mnisi, S. (2020). Complexities in the implementation of fourth industrial revolution tools to equip pre-service teachers in a South African university. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 18(3), 350–354.
Mokoena, J. D., Matlakala, M. C., & Tladi, F. M. (2014). Learning and Assessment of Nursing Unit Management Practice Using a Portfolio. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 5(3), 1597–1601. https://doi.org/10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2014.0212
Mtshali, T. I., Ramaligela, S. M., & Makgato, M. (2020). Usage of digital resources in Civil Technology: A case of teaching Tools and Equipment. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 12(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2019.1609782
Mtshali, T. I., & Singh-Pillay, A. (2023). Pedagogical Capital Strategies for Civil Technology Skills-Based Activities. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(5), 389–409. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.5.20
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Dickinson, W. B., Leech, N. L., & Zoran, A. G. (2009). A Qualitative Framework for Collecting and Analyzing Data in Focus Group Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800301
Pazin Fadzil, A. H., Mistima, M. S., & Sofwan, M. M. (2022). Factors influencing teachers’ creative teaching: A systematic review. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(1), 250–264. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i1.6696
Peterson, J. S. (2019). Presenting a Qualitative Study: A Reviewer’s Perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(3), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219844789
Prins, R., Avraamidou, L., & Goedhart, M. (2017). Tell me a Story: The use of narrative as a learning tool for natural selection. Educational Media International, 54(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2017.1324361
Rahi, S. (2017). Research Design and Methods: A Systematic Review of Research Paradigms, Sampling Issues and Instruments Development. International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences, 06(02). https://doi.org/10.4172/2162-6359.1000403
Rosenberg, M. S., Sindelar, P. T., & Hardman, M. L. (2004). Preparing Highly Qualified Teachers for Students with Emotional or Behavioral Disorders: The Impact of NCLB and IDEA. Behavioral Disorders, 29(3), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290402900308
Sebele-Mpofu, F. Y. (2020). Saturation controversy in qualitative research: Complexities and underlying assumptions. A literature review. Cogent Social Sciences, 6(1), 1838706. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1838706
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching:Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Sibiya, M. T., Mtshali, T. I., & Ramaligela, M. S. (2023). The Use of Augmented Reality to Promote Equity and Inclusion: A Case of Teaching and Learning Graphical Communication and Graphical Techniques in the Technology Classroom. In P. Escudeiro, N. Escudeiro, & O. Bernardes (Eds.), Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design (pp. 170–188). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6868-5.ch009
Suen, L.-J. W., Huang, H.-M., & Lee, H.-H. (2014). A comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Hu Li Za Zhi The Journal of Nursing, 61(3), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.61.3.105
Szurmak, J., & Thuna, M. (2013). Tell Me a Story: The Use Of Narrative as Tool for Instruction. Imagine, Innovate, Inspire, 546–552. https://alair.ala.org/handle/11213/18134
Wininger, S. R., Redifer, J. L., Norman, A. D., & Ryle, M. K. (2019). Prevalence of Learning Styles in Educational Psychology and Introduction to Education Textbooks: A Content Analysis. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 18(3), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719830301
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Elizabeth Katane Kekana, Thokozani Isaac Mtshali, Manto Sylvia Ramaligela
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
