Investigating Factors Contributing to Poor Performance in Teaching and Learning of N3 Assembly Drawing: A Case of uMgungundlovu TVET College

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v8i1.1479

Keywords:

assembly drawing, drawing, engineering graphics and design, TVET, spatial visualization, engineering drawing, lecturers, students

Abstract

Poor performance in Assembly Drawing (AD) has been a significant issue in Engineering Graphics and Design (EGD) in high schools and TVET colleges. This poor performance in AD, which is a crucial component of the EGD exam, leads to students not performing well in Grade 12 and consequently limits their entry into engineering programs in TVET colleges. Consequently, this study aims to investigate the contributing factors to poor performance in the teaching and learning of AD among N3 students. To achieve the objectives of this study, a mixed research approach was employed, and data was collected through semi-structured interviews and the Purdue Spatial Visualization Test (PSVT). A purposive sampling method was used to select four Engineering Drawing (ED) lecturers and 45 N3 Engineering Drawing students to participate in this study. Furthermore, Piaget's perception and imagery theory and Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) were utilized as frameworks underpinning this study. The interview results were analyzed using thematic analysis, while the data from the PSVT was analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). The findings of this study indicate that N3 students have very low spatial visualization skills, and the negative attitude displayed by both students and lecturers towards the teaching and learning of AD contributes to poor performance in N3 ED. The findings further revealed that the lack of drawing-related teaching qualifications among lecturers also contributes to poor performance in AD. Furthermore, the quantitative findings show that the students achieved a mean score of 16.82, with a standard deviation of 8.389, indicating poor performance on the PSVT test. One limitation of this study is the small number of lecturers interviewed (four), which makes it difficult to generalize the results. Therefore, future studies should include a larger sample size of lecturers. This study recommends that lecturers be hired based on their relevant teaching qualifications and further suggests the use of technology to enhance students' spatial visualization skills and improve their performance in AD.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ankiewicz, P. (2019). Perceptions and attitudes of pupils towards technology: In search of a rigorous theoretical framework. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9434-z

Ashraf, I., Ashraf, F., Saeed, I., Gulzar, H., Shah, K., Azhar, N., Bukhari, S. R., Ilyas, T., & Anam, W. (2015). Reasons for Low Performance of Teachers: A Study of Government Schools operating in Bahawalpur City, Pakistan. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 4(2), Pages 105-117. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v4-i2/1764

Badenhorst, J. W., & Radile, R. S. (2018). Poor Performance at TVET Colleges: Conceptualising a Distributed Instructional Leadership Approach as a Solution. Africa Education Review, 15(3), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2017.1352452

Baidoo-Anu, D. (2018). Students and Teachers Attitudes Responsible for Poor Academic Performance of Junior High School Students. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 2(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJESS/2018/40174

Bodner, G. M., & Guay, R. B. (1997). The Purdue Visualization of Rotations Test. The Chemical Educator, 2(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00897970138a

Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Terry, G. (2019). Thematic Analysis. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences (pp. 843–860). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103

Cheng, J., Wang, Y., Tjondronegoro, D., & Song, W. (2018). Construction of Interactive Teaching System for Course of Mechanical Drawing Based on Mobile Augmented Reality Technology. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 13(02), 126. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i02.7847

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.

Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-Methods Research: A Discussion on its Types, Challenges, and Criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20

DBE. (2011). Curriculum and assessment policy statement: Grades 10-12 Engineering Graphics and Design. Department of Basic Education Petoria.

DBE. (2022). National Senior Certificate. Diagnostic report part 3:Teachnical subjects. Government printers. Department of Basic Education Petoria.

Diraso, D., Manabete, S., Amalo, K., Mbudai, Y., Suleiman, A., & Jaoji, A. (2013). Evaluation of students’ performance in technical and engineering drawing towards an effective career choice in engineering and technical and vocational education. International Journal of Educational Research and Development, 2(4), 89–97.

Eteli, I., & Eniekenemi, E. (2016). Effect of Autocad Software In Teaching Isometric And Oblique Drawing Among Female Students In Federal Science Technical College Tungbo, Bayelsa State. International Journal of Education and Evaluation, 2(2), 25–31.

Giesecke, F. E., Mitchell, A., Spencer, H. C., Hill, I. L., Dygdon, J. T., Novak, J. E., Loving, R. O., Lockhart, S., & Johnson, C. (2016). Technical Drawing with Engineering Graphics. Pearson Education.

Kabouridis, G. (2010). An innovative approach to face the first-year mechanical engineering students’ conceptual difficulties in engineering design. 1st WIETE Annual Conference on Engineering and Technology Education. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/An-innovative-approach-to-face-the-first-year-in-Kabouridis/31df138a74cf2ecb40fe82b3efa284e812f14335

Kahveci, H. (2023). The positive and negative effects of teacher attitudes and behaviors on student progress. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(1), 290–306. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202319128

Kaya, M., & Erdem, C. (2021). Students’ Well-Being and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis Study. Child Indicators Research, 14(5), 1743–1767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-021-09821-4

Khoza, S. (2018). A teaching strategy for sectional drawing concept: A Case of pre-service teachers in a Johannesburg University, South Africa. 9655–9661. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2018.2419

Khoza, S. D. (2017). Spatial skill’s development and line-work improvement in learning the Design process in a Technology Subject at a Johannesburg University. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 9(4), 3020–3027. https://doi.org/10.21817/ijet/2017/v9i4/170904106

Kok, P. J., & Bayaga, A. (2019). Enhancing Graphic Communication and Design Student Teachers’ Spatial Visualisation Skills through 3D Solid Computer Modelling. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 23(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2019.1587249

Leeuwen, J. V., & Plooy, D. D. (2012). Engineering Graphics and Design Textbook: NCAPS. Grade 11. Allcopy Publishers.

Makgato, M. (2016). Difficulties of Student Teachers in the Engineering Graphics and Design Course at a South African University: Snapshot on Sectional Drawing. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1220a

Maruni?, G., & Glažar, V. (2013). Spatial ability through engineering graphics education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 703–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-012-9211-y

Maruni?, G., & Glažar, V. (2014). Improvement and assessment of spatial ability in engineering education. Engineering Review, 34(2), 139–150.

Mlambo, P. B. (2023). Information and Communications Technology in Engineering Graphics and Design Classrooms: A post COVID-19 era. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 7(2), 160–175. https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v7i2.1321

Mlambo, P. B., Maeko, M. S. A., & Khoza, S. D. (2023). Teachers’ Readiness towards the Integration of Information and Communications Technology in Teaching and Learning of Engineering Graphics and Design in KwaZulu-Natal. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 8(3), 176–195. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2023.26

Mtshali, T. I., & Singh-Pillay, A. (2023). Pedagogical Capital Strategies for Civil Technology Skills-Based Activities. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(5), 389–409. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.5.20

Mtshali, T., Sylvia, R., & Manto. (2019). Civil Technology Teacher’s Environmental Knowledge in Promoting Active Learning During Practical Lessons: A South African Perspective. Online Journal for TVET Practitioners, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.30880/ojtp.00.00.0000.00.0000

Narayana, K. L. (2019). Machine Drawing (Sixth edition). New Age International Publishers.

Nelavai, N., & Ramesh, S. (2020). An Insight into the challenges faced by First Year Engineering Students: Poor Foundational Knowledge. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 823–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.118

Piaget, J. (1971). The theory of stages in cognitive development. In Measurement and Piaget (pp. ix, 283–ix, 283). McGraw-Hill.

Ramatsetse, B., Daniyan, I., Mpofu, K., & Makinde, O. (2023). State of the art applications of engineering graphics and design to enhance innovative product design: A systematic review. Procedia CIRP, 119, 699–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.05.006

Reddy, C. (2017). Environmental education in teacher education: A viewpoint exploring options in South Africa. Southern African Journal of Environmental Education, 33(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajee.v.33i1.9

Rikza, Johar, R., & Elizar, E. (2024). Students responses in using video tutorials to test students’ spatial ability. 020030. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0184720

Roestenburg, W. J. H., Strydom, H., & Fouché, C. B. (2021). Research at Grass Roots: For the Social Sciences and Human Services Professions. Van Schaik Publishers.

Sa’ad, T. U., Adamu, A., & M. Sadiq, A. (2014). The Causes of Poor Performance in Mathematics among Public Senior Secondary School Students in Azare Metropolis of Bauchi State, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME), 4(6), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-04633240

Šafhalter, A., Glodež, S., Šorgo, A., & Ploj Virti?, M. (2022). Development of spatial thinking abilities in engineering 3D modeling course aimed at lower secondary students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(1), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09597-8

Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching:Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Singh- Pillay, A., & Sotsaka, D. S. (2016). Engineering Graphics and Design Teachers’ Understanding and Teaching of Assembly Drawing. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00668a

Sotsaka, D., & Singh-Pillay, A. (2020). Meeting the challenges first year engineering graphic design pre-service teachers encounter when they read and interpret assembly drawing. Journal of Education, 80, 72–86. https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i80a04

Sotsaka, D. T. S. (2015). An exploration of the interface between Grade 11 Engineering Graphics and Design teachers’ understanding of Assembly Drawing and their practice: A case study of the uThukela District, KwaZulu-Natal. [Thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal]. http://hdl.handle.net/10413/13750

Sotsaka, D. T. S. (2019). Unmasking how pre-service engineering graphics and design teachers read and interpret assembly drawing at a university of technology: A case study in Umgungundlovu, KwaZulu-Natal [Thesis]. University of KwaZulu Natal.

Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035

Tetnowski, J. (2015). Qualitative Case Study Research Design. Perspectives on Fluency and Fluency Disorders, 25(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1044/ffd25.1.39

Vetter, T. R. (2017). Descriptive Statistics: Reporting the Answers to the 5 Basic Questions of Who, What, Why, When, Where, and a Sixth, So What? Anesthesia & Analgesia, 125(5), 1797–1802. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002471

Downloads

Published

2024-01-25

How to Cite

Mlambo, P. B., & Mkhwanazi, M. S. (2024). Investigating Factors Contributing to Poor Performance in Teaching and Learning of N3 Assembly Drawing: A Case of uMgungundlovu TVET College. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 8(1), 102–121. https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v8i1.1479

Issue

Section

Original Research Article