Are More Proficient Readers More Strategic? A Case Study of Four Taiwanese EFL University Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v7i3.1483Keywords:
Reading proficiency, Reading strategies, SORS, Taiwan EFL, Think-aloud protocolAbstract
The article presents the results, interpretations, and potential pedagogical implications of an experimental case study that explored the beliefs and actual use of reading strategies of four Taiwanese EFL university students. The emphasis of the qualitative analysis is put on what the participants effectively do rather than what they believe they do, something that many studies in the field overlook. In addition, the study investigated the interplay between reading strategy use and reading proficiency. The research triangulates the introspective data with the products of participants’ task activity. The participants were asked to fill out a self-reporting questionnaire. After a few days, they performed a reading task accompanied by the think-aloud protocol, took a comprehension test, and were interviewed. The study revealed that participants’ perceptions of their reading strategy use and the actual use were not always aligned. More importantly, the study findings indicate that the variety, frequency, and appropriateness of the actual use of reading strategies positively correlated with the participants' reading and general linguistic proficiency levels. Pedagogical implications and suggestions for further research are discussed, as well as the current study's limitations.
Downloads
References
Abraham, R., & Vann, R. (1987). Strategies of two language learners: A case study. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 85-102). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Alsheikh, N. O., & Mokhtari, K. (2011). An examination of the metacognitive reading strategies used by native speakers of Arabic when reading in English and Arabic. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n2p151
Anderson, N. J. (2008). Metacognition and good language learners. In C. Grif?ths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 99-109). London: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497667.010
Anderson, N. J. (2012). Reading instruction. In J. C. Richards & A. Burns (Eds.), Cambridge guide to pedagogy and practice in second language teaching (pp. 218-225). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024778.028
Baker, L. (1985). How do we know when we don't understand? Standards for evaluating text comprehension. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. McKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition and human performance, Vol. 1 (pp. 155-205). New York: Academic.
Baker, L. (2001). Metacognition in comprehension instruction. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 77-95). New York: Guilford.
Bakhshalinezhad, L., Nikou, F. R., & Bonyadi, A. (2015). Using the think-aloud technique for determining different reading strategies used by Iranian EFL learners. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6, 15-22. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.3p.15
Bernhardt, E. B. (2011). Understanding advanced second-language reading. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203852408
Borkowski, J. G., Carr, M., Rellinger, L., & Pressley, M. (1990). Self-regulated cognition: Interdependence of metacognition, attributions and self-esteem. In B. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 53-92). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
Botsas, G., & Padeliadu, S. (2003). Goal orientation and reading comprehension strategy use among students with and without reading dif?culties. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 477-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2004.06.010
Brantmeier, C. (2001). Second language reading research on passage content and gender. Challenges for the intermediate level curriculum. Foreign Language Annals, 34, 325-333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2001.tb02064.x
Brantmeier, C., Sullivan, J. A. H., & Strube, M. (2014). Toward independent L2 readers: Effects of text adjuncts, subject knowledge, L1 reading, and L2 proficiency. Reading in a Foreign Language, 26, 34-53.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brevik, L. M. (2017). Strategies and shoes: Can we ever have enough? Teaching and using reading comprehension strategies in general and vocational programmes. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(1), 76-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1075310
Brown, H. D. (2014). Principles of language learning and teaching (6th.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction. Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112-130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190505000061
Chen, K. T.-C., & Chen, S. C.-L. (2015). The use of EFL reading strategies among high school students in Taiwan. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 15(2), 156-166.
Cheng, C. K. (2000). The relationship between four metacognitive factors and reading ability. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (ROC-TEFL) (pp. 277-293). Taipei: Soochow University.
Chou, M.-H. (2021). The mediating role of achievement emotions in the relationship between instructional clarity, English proficiency, and reading strategies. Educational Psychology, 41(5), 582-601. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2021.1882660
Doolittle, A., & Welch, C. (1989). Gender differences in performance on a college-level achievement test. Iowa City, IA: American College Testing Program. https://doi.org/10.1037/e426722008-001
Dreyer, C., & Nel, C. (2003). Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within a technology-enhanced learning environment. System, 31, 349-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00047-2
Ee, J., & Chan, L. (1994). Attributional beliefs, goal orientations, strategic learning and achievement of primary 6 Singaporean students. In Paper presented at the Annual 1994 AARE Conference. Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Endley, M. J. (2016). Proficiency as a variable in Gulf EFL students' employment of reading strategies. Reading in a Foreign Language, 28(2), 183-223.
Eskey, D. E. (2005). Reading in a second language. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook on second language teaching and learning (pp. 563-579). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Finkbeiner, C. (2005). Interessen und Strategien beim fremdsprachlichen Lesen. Wie Schülerinnen und Schüler englische Texte lesen und verstehen. Tübingen: Narr.
Fitrisia, D., Tan, K.-E., & Yusuf, Y. Q. (2015). Investigating metacognitive awareness of reading strategies to strengthen students' performance in reading comprehension. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 30, 15-30.
Ghaith, G. (2018). English as a second/foreign language reading comprehension: A framework for curriculum and instruction. TESL Reporter, 50(2), 1-17.
Ghaith, G., & El-Sanyoura, H. (2019). Reading comprehension: The mediating role of metacognitive strategies. Reading in a Foreign Language, 31(1), 19-43.
Ghavamnia, M., Ketabi, S., & Tavakoli, M. (2013). L2 reading strategies used by Iranian EFL learners: A think-aloud study. Reading Psychology, 34(4), 355-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2011.640097
Goodman, K. S. (1976). Reading. A psycholinguistic guessing game. In H. Singer & R. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (2nd.). Newark, Del.: International Reading Association.
Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 375-406. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586977
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139150484
Grabe, W., & Stoller, L. F. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Grotjahn, R. (1987). On the methodological basis of introspective methods. In C. Faerch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Introspection in second language research (pp. 54-81). Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
Guo, Y., & Roehrig, A. D. (2011). Roles of general versus second language (L2) knowledge in L2 reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 23(1), 42-64.
Habok, A., & Magyar, A. (2019). The effects of EFL reading comprehension and certain learning-related factors on EFL learners' reading strategy use. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1616522
Han, F. (2018). Strategic processing of Chinese young English language learners in an international stan¬dardized English language test. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(1020), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01020
Horwitz, E. K. (1999). Cultural and situational influences on foreign language learners' beliefs about language learning: A review of BALLI studies. System, 27(4), 557-576. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00050-0
Hu, H. (2012). An investigation of Taiwanese vocational high school students' use of metacognitive reading strategies. Unpublished Master Thesis. National Taiwan Normal University.
Huang, H., Chern, C., & Lin, C. (2009). EFL learners' use of online reading strategies and comprehension of texts: An exploratory study. Computers & Education, 52, 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.003
Huang, S. C. (2006). Reading English for academic purposes -What situational factors may motivate learners to read? System, 34, 371-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.04.006
Jincheng, Z., & Rahmat, N. H. (2022). Investigating the Use of Metacognitive Reading Strategies Using Think Aloud Protocol. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(10), 772 – 784.
Ko, M. (2002). A study on teachers' perception of strategy use: Reading strategy instruction and students' motivation to read. Journal of National Huwei Institute of Technology, 5, 202-212.
Koda, K. (2007). Reading and language learning: Crosslinguistic constraints on second language reading development. Language Learning, 57, 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.101997010-i1
Kung, S.-S. (2013). Exploring the useful reading strategies among EFL college students in Taiwan. Chinese Studies, 2(4), 193-196. https://doi.org/10.4236/chnstd.2013.24031
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2
Lai, Y. L., Tung, Y, J., & Luo, S. Y. (2008). Theory of reading strategies and its application by EFL learners. Reflections on two case studies.pdf. Journal of Lunghwa University of Science and Technology, 26, 153-168.
LTTC. (2016). GEPT-CEFR alignment. Retrieved March 25, 2022, from https://www.lttc.ntu.edu.tw/E_LTTC/E_GEPT/alignment.htm
Madhumathi, P., & Ghosh, A. (2012). Awareness of reading strategy use of Indian ESL students and the relationship with reading comprehension achievement. English Language Teaching, 5(12), 131-140.
https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n12p131
Malcolm, D. (2009). Reading strategy awareness of Arabic-speaking medical students studying in English. System, 37(4), 640-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.09.008
Markman, E. M. (1979). Realising that you don't understand. A preliminary investigation. Child Development, 9, 111-151.
Marx, A., Stanat, P., Roick, T., Segerer, R., Marx, P., & Schneider, W. (2015). Components of reading com¬prehension in adolescent first-language and second-language students from lowtrack schools. Reading and Writing, 28, 891-914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9554-3
McGrath, L., Berggren, J., & Mežek, Š. (2016). Reading EAP: Investigating high proficiency L2 university students' strategy use through reading blogs. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 152-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.03.003
Meniado, J. C. (2016). Metacognitive reading strategies, motivation, and reading comprehension performance of Saudi EFL students. English Language Teaching, 9(3), 117-129. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n3p117
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249
Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students' awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(3), 2-10.
Nordin, N. M., Rashid, S. M., Zubir, S. I. S. S., & Sadjirin, R. (2013). Differences in reading strategies: How ESL learners really read. Procedia, 90, 468-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.116
O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524490
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies. What every teacher should know. New York: Newburry House/Harper & Row.
Oxford, R. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Self-regulation in context (2nd.). London / New York: Routledge.
Oxford, R., & Cohen, A. (1992). Language learning strategies: Crucial issues of concept and classification. Applied Language Learning, 3, 1-35.
Oxford, R., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73(3), 291-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb06367.x
Paris, S. G., Wasik, B. A., & Turner, J. C. (1996). The development of strategic readers. In R. Bar, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Parson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Vol. II (pp. 609-640). New York: Longman.
Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance. Language Testing, 20(1), 26-56. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532203lt243oa
Phakiti, A. (2008). Construct validation of Bachman and Paler's (1996) strategic competence model over time in EFL reading tests. Language Testing, 25(5), 237-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532207086783
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
Pintrich, P. R., Roeser, R., & De Groot, E. (1994). Classroom and individual differences in early adolescents' motivation and self-regulated learning. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 139-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/027243169401400204
Poole, A. (2012). The metacognitive strategic knowledge of seven successful Chinese L1 readers at a North American University: A qualitative study. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 3(4), 392-406.
https://doi.org/10.37237/030405
Pressley, M. (2002). Improving comprehension instruction. A path for the future. In C. C. Block, L. B. Gambrell, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Improving comprehension instruction: Rethinking research, theory, and classroom practice (pp. 385-399). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305
Roe, B. D., & Smith, S. H. (2012). Teaching reading in today's elementary schools. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata. The Building Blocks of Cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Saricoban, A. (2002). Reading strategies of successful readers through the three phase approach. The Reading Matrix, 2(3), 1-16.
Schraw, G. (1994). The effect of metacognitive knowledge on local and global monitoring. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 143-154. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1013
Shang, H.-F. (2010). Reading strategy use, self-efficacy and EFL reading comprehension. Asian EFL Journal, 12(2), 18-42.
Shang, H.-F. (2011). Exploring the relationship between EFL proficiency level and reading strategy use. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(3), 18-27.
Shang, H.-F. (2017a). EFL medical students' metacognitive strategy use for hypertext reading comprehension. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30, 259-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9156-y
Shang, H.-F. (2017b). Exploring metacognitive strategies and hypermedia annotations on foreign language reading. Interactive Learning Environments, 255(610-623). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1171787
Shen, M. Y., & Huang, Y. K. (2007). Collaborative action research for reading strategy instruction: A case in Taiwan. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 4(1), 109-121.
Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00039-2
Shih, Y.-C., Chern, C., & Reynolds, B. L. (2018). Bringing extensive reading and reading strategies into the Taiwanese junior college classroom. Reading in a Foreign Language, 30(1), 130-151.
Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward and R & D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Sutiyatno, S. (2019). A Survey Study: The Correlation between Metacognitive Strategies and Reading Achievement. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(4), 438–444.
Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(1), 32-71. https://doi.org/10.2307/747348
Taylor, A., Stevens, J., & Asher, J. W. (2006). The effects of explicit reading strategy training on L2 reading comprehension. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesising research on language learning and teaching (pp. 213-244). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.13.11tay
Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. In C. Willig & W. Stainton Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (2nd., pp. 17-37). London: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555.n2
Vann, R., & Abraham, R. (1990). Strategies of unsuccessful language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 24(2), 177-198. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586898
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In W. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315-327). New York: Macmillan.
Youlden, A.-M., & Chan, L. K. S. (1995). Motivational orientations, strategic learning and achievement in English in years 5, 7 and 9. Preliminary ?ndings. In Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education, Annual Conference. Hobart, Australia.
Zhang, L. J. (2010). A dynamic metacognitive systems account of Chinese university students' knowledge about EFL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), 320-353. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.223352
Zhang, L. J., Gu, P. Y., & Hu, G. (2008). A cognitive perspective on Singaporean primary school pupils' use of reading strategies in learning to read in English. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 245-271. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907X218179
Zuledwi, W., Ratmanida, R., & Marlina, L. (2018). The relationship of students' metacognitive reading strategies awareness and reading comprehension: The case of the sixth semester students of the English department, University of Negeri Pandang, (UND). Journal of English Language Teaching, 7, 399-413.
Zwaan, R. A., & Graesser, A. C. (1998). Introduction to Special Issue of SSR. Constructing meaning during reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(3), 195-198. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0203_1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Daniel Edward Szpotanski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
