Learning Outcomes of the Inquiry-in-Action Model for Chemistry Experimentation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v8i1.1685Keywords:
Demonstration, Experimentation, Inquiry-in-action, Science process skills, Solutions and solubilityAbstract
There is overwhelming evidence supporting the decline of science education in Liberia. In an effort to contribute to the solution, we conducted a study to examine the impact of inquiry-based experimentation and conventional demonstration on the conceptual understanding of solutions and solubility among grade eleven students. We also investigated the relationship between students' achievement scores in solutions and solubility and their science inquiry process skills. A cluster random sample of eight schools was initially selected from 12 out of 31 high schools that had the necessary space and materials for experimentation. Using a Non-equivalent control group research design, the experimental group received instruction using inquiry-based experimentation, while the control group received instruction using traditional demonstration methods, for a period of six weeks. The results were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U, and Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests. The findings indicated that inquiry-based experimentation reduced students' anxiety and increased their confidence in chemistry experiments. Although the inquiry-in-action model enhanced learners' conceptual understanding of solutions and solubility, it did not significantly improve their mastery of the mathematical components of the test. However, it did significantly enhance students' science inquiry process skills. It should be noted that while the inquiry-in-action model positively influenced learners' attitudes toward their preferences, behavior, and anxieties in chemistry experiments, it also led to a general demotivation to learn chemistry through experimentation. Additionally, there was a positive correlation between students' attitudes toward teaching and learning chemistry through experiments and their science inquiry process skills. However, this correlation was stronger between students' attitudes towards the demonstration of experiments and their science inquiry process skills compared to the attitudes towards the inquiry-in-action model and science inquiry process skills. This suggests that the traditional demonstration method is not entirely ineffective, and a combination of both demonstration and inquiry-based experimentation approaches may be a viable way to maximize the benefits of science experiments.
Downloads
References
Abraham, A., & Collins, D. (2011). Taking the Next Step: Ways Forward for Coaching Science. Quest, 63(4), 366–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2011.10483687
Adewumi, A. F., & Monisola, K. A. (2013). Continuous Assessment, Mock Results and Gender as Predictors of Academic Performance of Chemistry Students in WASSCE and NECO Examinations in Ekiti State. International Education Studies, 6(7), p1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n7p1
Almetov, N., Zhorabekova, A., Sagdullayev, I., Abilhairova, Z., & Tulenova, K. (2020). Engineering Education: Problems of Modernization in the Context of a Competence Approach. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 10(6), 7. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v10i6.14043
Anastas, P. T., & Zimmerman, J. B. (2018). The United Nations sustainability goals: How can sustainable chemistry contribute? Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 13, 150–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.04.017
Arnold, M. E., Bourdeau, V. D., & Nott, B. D. (2013). Measuring Science Inquiry Skills in Youth Development Programs: The Science Process Skills Inventory. Journal of Youth Development, 8(1), 15-Apr. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2013.103
Bal?m, A. (2009). The Effects of Discovery Learning on Students’ Success and Inquiry Learning Skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (EJER), 9, 1–17.
Bolte, E. E., & Diehl, J. J. (2013). Measurement Tools and Target Symptoms/Skills Used to Assess Treatment Response for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(11), 2491–2501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1798-7
Brown, T. E., LeMay, H. E., Bursten, B. E., Murphy, C., Woodward, P., & Stoltzfus, M. E. (2017). Chemistry: The Central Science. Pearson Education.
Bunterm, T., Lee, K., Ng Lan Kong, J., Srikoon, S., Vangpoomyai, P., Rattanavongsa, J., & Rachahoon, G. (2014). Do Different Levels of Inquiry Lead to Different Learning Outcomes? A comparison between guided and structured inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 1937–1959. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.886347
Chan, M., Pan, A., Zhao, A., & Zhou, E. (2015). Enhancing Science Education in Liberia. A Trip to Liberia, Summer 2015 [Report]. I-HELP Liberia. https://docplayer.net/41220712-Enhancing-science-education-in-liberia-a-trip-to-liberia-summer-2015.html
Chatterjee, S., Williamson, V. M., McCann, K., & Peck, M. L. (2009). Surveying Students’ Attitudes and Perceptions toward Guided-Inquiry and Open-Inquiry Laboratories. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(12), 1427. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed086p1427
Cheung, D. (2009). Developing a Scale to Measure Students’ Attitudes toward Chemistry Lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 31(16), 2185–2203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802189799
Chowdhury, P. (2014). Students’ Discourse in a Science Classroom; Makes Better Learning: A Different Approach. European Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(2), 334–348.
Constantinou, C. P., Tsivitanidou, O. E., & Rybska, E. (2018). What Is Inquiry-Based Science Teaching and Learning? In O. E. Tsivitanidou, P. Gray, E. Rybska, L. Louca, & C. P. Constantinou (Eds.), Professional Development for Inquiry-Based Science Teaching and Learning (Vol. 5, pp. 1–23). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91406-0_1
Dass, P. M. (2015). Teaching STEM Effectively with the Learning Cycle Approach. K-12 STEM Education, 1(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.14456/K12STEMED.2015.17
Dinçol Özgür, S., & Y?lmaz, A. (2017). The effect of inquiry-based learning on gifted and talented students’ understanding of acids-bases concepts and motivation. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(6), 994–1008. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.994
Dostál, J., & Klement, M. (2015). Inquiry-based Instruction and Relating Appeals of Pedagogical Theories and Practices. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 648–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.173
El Mawas, N., & Muntean, C. H. (2018). Supporting lifelong learning through development of 21st century skills. 7343–7350. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2018.1723
Folounrunso, B. E., & Sunday, A. O. (2017). Relative effectiveness of guided discovery and demonstration teaching techniques on students’ performance in chemistry in senior secondary schools in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.999982
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed). McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206
Gberie, L., & Mosley, J. (2016). Research and knowledge systems in Liberia. INASP.
Gbollie, C., & Keamu, H. P. (2017). Student Academic Performance: The Role of Motivation, Strategies, and Perceived Factors Hindering Liberian Junior and Senior High School Students Learning. Education Research International, 2017, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1789084
George-Williams, S. R., Ziebell, A. L., Kitson, R. R. A., Coppo, P., Thompson, C. D., & Overton, T. L. (2018). ‘What do you think the aims of doing a practical chemistry course are?’ A comparison of the views of students and teaching staff across three universities. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(2), 463–473. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00177K
Hanafi, H. (2016). The Effect of Discovery Learning Method Application on Increasing Students’ Listening Outcome and Social Attitude. Dinamika Ilmu, 16(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v16i2.552
Hardianti, T., & Kuswanto, H. (2017). Difference among Levels of Inquiry: Process Skills Improvement at Senior High School in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1028a
Harlen, W. (2013). Assessment & inquiry-based science education: Issues in policy and practice. Global Network of Science Academies (IAP) Science Education Programme (SEP). https://www.interacademies.org/sites/default/files/publication/ibse_assessment_guide_iap_sep_0.pdf
Hauspie, C., Schelfhout, S., Dirix, N., Fonteyne, L., Szmalec, A., & Duyck, W. (2023). Interactions of gender with predictors of academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 74, 102186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102186
Henige, K. (2011). Undergraduate student attitudes and perceptions toward low- and high-level inquiry exercise physiology teaching laboratory experiences. Advances in Physiology Education, 35(2), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00086.2010
Hinneh, J. T., & Nenty, H. J. (2016). Analysis of the Predictive Validity of Students’ Performance in Core Sciences on Liberian SHSCE with WASSCE as the Criterion. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 6(4), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0604042531
Horsley, J., & Moeed, A. (2018). “Inspire me”—High-ability students’ perceptions of school science. Science Education International, 29(3), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v29.i3.4
Jegstad, K. M. (2023). Inquiry-based chemistry education: A systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 0(0), 1–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2248436
Kiazai, A. N., Siddiqua, N., & Waheed, Z. (2020). Challenges in Implementing STEM Education and Role of Teacher Education Programs in Mitigating these Challenges. International Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning, 5(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.36261/ijdeel.v5i2.1047
Kinyota, M. (2020). The status of and challenges facing secondary science teaching in Tanzania: A focus on inquiry-based science teaching and the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 42(13), 2126–2144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1813348
Koksal, E. A., & Berberoglu, G. (2014). The Effect of Guided-Inquiry Instruction on 6th Grade Turkish Students’ Achievement, Science Process Skills, and Attitudes Toward Science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.721942
Korkmaz, F. (2012). Contribution of some factors to eight grade students’ science achievement in Turkey: TIMSS 2007 [Master Thesis, Middle East Technical University]. https://open.metu.edu.tr/handle/11511/21836
Kubiatko, M., Balatova, K., Fancovicova, J., & Prokop, P. (2017). Pupils’ Attitudes toward Chemistry in Two Types of Czech Schools. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01239a
Li, Q., Zhu, X., & Lo, L. N. K. (2019). Teacher education and teaching in China. Teachers and Teaching, 25(7), 753–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1693429
Mehta, S., & Kulshrestha, A. K. (2014). Implementation of Cooperative Learning in Science: A Developmental-cum-Experimental Study. Education Research International, 2014, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/431542
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry?based science instruction—what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347
Montes, L. H., Ferreira, R. A., & Rodríguez, C. (2018). Explaining secondary school students’ attitudes towards chemistry in Chile. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(2), 533–542. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00003D
Nedungadi, P., Malini, P., & Raman, R. (2015). Inquiry Based Learning Pedagogy for Chemistry Practical Experiments Using OLabs. In E.-S. M. El-Alfy, S. M. Thampi, H. Takagi, S. Piramuthu, & T. Hanne (Eds.), Advances in Intelligent Informatics (Vol. 320, pp. 633–642). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11218-3_56
Nicol, C. B. (2021). An Overview of Inquiry-Based Science Instruction Amid Challenges. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(12), em2042. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11350
Nicol, C. B., Gakuba, E., & Habinshuti, G. (2022). Effects of inquiry-based chemistry experimentation on students’ attitudes towards the teaching and learning of chemistry. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(4), 663–679. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.663
Ogan-Bekiro?lu, F., & Arslan, A. (2014). Examination of the Effects of Model-based Inquiry on Students’ Outcomes: Scientific Process Skills and Conceptual Knowledge. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 1187–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.202
Oliveira, A. W., Brown, A. O., Zhang, W. S., LeBrun, P., Eaton, L., & Yemen, S. (2021). Fostering creativity in science learning: The potential of open-ended student drawing. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 103416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103416
Omorogbe, E., & Ewansiha, J. C. (2013). The Challenge of Effective Science Teaching in Nigerian Secondary Schools. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(7), 2281–3993. http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n7p181
Prudnikov, V. A. (2020). Modern Development Prospects of Programs in Engineering Education inside National University that Use Information and Communication Technologies. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 10(3), 64. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v10i3.12619
Pulungan, M. S., Nasution, D., & Rahmatsyah. (2021). The effect of scientific inquiry learning model and scientific attitude on students’ science process skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1811(1), 012003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1811/1/012003
Riga, F., Winterbottom, M., Harris, E., & Newby, L. (2017). Inquiry-Based Science Education. In K. S. Taber & B. Akpan (Eds.), Science Education (pp. 247–261). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-749-8_19
Sahintepe, S., Erkol, M., & Aydogdu, B. (2020). The Impact of Inquiry Based Learning Approach on Secondary School Students’ Science Process Skills. Open Journal for Educational Research, 4(2), 117–142.
Sesen, B. A., & Tarhan, L. (2013). Inquiry-Based Laboratory Activities in Electrochemistry: High School Students’ Achievements and Attitudes. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9275-9
Shwartz, G., Shav-Artza, O., & Dori, Y. J. (2021). Choosing Chemistry at Different Education and Career Stages: Chemists, Chemical Engineers, and Teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(5), 692–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09912-5
Taber, K. S. (2013). Revisiting the chemistry triplet: Drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and the psychology of learning to inform chemistry education. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 14(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00012E
Tan, A.-L., Poon, C.-L., & Lim, S. S. L. (Eds.). (2014). Inquiry into the Singapore Science Classroom: Research and Practices. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-78-1
Ural, E. (2016). The Effect of Guided-Inquiry Laboratory Experiments on Science Education Students’ Chemistry Laboratory Attitudes, Anxiety and Achievement. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(4), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i4.1395
Uzezi, J. G., & Zainab, S. (2017). Effectiveness of Guided-Inquiry Laboratory Experiments on Senior Secondary Schools Students Academic Achievement in Volumetric Analysis. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(7), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-5-7-4
Van Uum, M. S. J., Verhoeff, R. P., & Peeters, M. (2016). Inquiry-based science education: Towards a pedagogical framework for primary school teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 450–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1147660
Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2021). Fostering Students’ Creativity and Critical Thinking in Science Education. In A. Berry, C. Buntting, D. Corrigan, R. Gunstone, & A. Jones (Eds.), Education in the 21st Century: STEM, Creativity and Critical Thinking (pp. 29–47). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85300-6_3
Visser-Wijnveen, G. J., van der Rijst, R. M., & van Driel, J. H. (2016). A questionnaire to capture students’ perceptions of research integration in their courses. Higher Education, 71(4), 473–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9918-2
WAEC. (2016). Chief Examiners’ Report [Report]. West African Examinations Council.
WAEC. (2017). Results for the Liberia Junior and senior high school examinations [Report]. West African Examinations Council.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Christian Bob Nicol, Nuwoe Kellen, Sharba Zayzay
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
