Pengaruh Gaya Mengajar dan Koordinasi Mata-Tangan terhadap Keterampilan Dasar Forehand Tenis

Authors

  • M. Maulidin Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika
  • Herman Syah Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika
  • Intan Primayanti Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v4i2.199

Keywords:

Keterampilan Dasar Forehand Tenis, Koordinas Mata-Tangan, Komando, Inklusi, Forehand Tennis Skills, Hand-Eye Coordination, Command, Inclusion

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh dari gaya mengajar komando dengan gaya inklusi dan koordinasi mata-tangan terhadap keterampilan dasar forehand tenis. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian experimen dengan desain faktorial 2 x 2. Sampel terdiri dari 48 Mahasiswa putra program studi olahraga yang sesuai dengan kreterian mampu melakukan pukulan forehand, kemudian dilakukan tes Koordinasi mata-tangan, selanjutnya diurutkan berdasarkan skor tertinggi dan terendah diambil 27% kelompok atas dan 27% kelompok bawah, masing-masing dibagi menjadi empat kelompok, masing-masing terdiri dari 12 mahasiswa. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis varians dua jalur (ANOVA) dan dilanjutkan dengan uji Tukey pada tingkat signifikansi α = 0.05. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa (1) gaya komando memberikan pengaruh yang lebih besar dari pada gaya Inklusi, (2) terdapat interaksi antara gaya mengajar dan koordinasi mata-tangan, (3) pada koordinasi mata-tangan tinggi, gaya komando memberikan pengaruh yang lebih besar daripada gaya inklusi, dan (4) pada koordinasi mata-tangan rendah, tidak terjadi perbedaan pengaruh yang berarti antara gaya komando dengan gaya inklusi. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa gaya mengajar dan koordinasi mata-tangan berpengatuh terhadap keterampilan forehand tenis lapangan.

The Effects of Teaching Style and Hand-Eye Coordination on Basic Forehand Tennis Skills

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of command teaching style with inclusion style and eye-hand coordination on the basic skills of tennis forehand. This research is an experimental research with a 2 x 2 factorial design. The sample consisted of 48 male students of sports studies programs that are in accordance with criteria capable of making a forehand, then conducted a hand-eye coordination test, then sorted by the highest and lowest scores taken 27% of the upper group and 27% of the lower group, each divided into four groups, each consisting of 12 students. Data analysis technique used two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and then followed by Tukey's test at the significance level α = 0.05. The results of this study indicate that (1) the command style gives a greater influence than the Inclusion style, (2) there is an interaction between teaching style and eye-hand coordination, (3) on high eye-hand coordination, the command style gives more influence greater than the inclusion style, and (4) in low hand-eye coordination, there is no significant difference in influence between the command style and the inclusion style. Based on the results of the study it can be concluded that the teaching style and eye-hand coordination are subject to field tennis forehand skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • M. Maulidin, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika
    Dosen UNDIKMA

References

Athin P., Nikolaos D., Athanasios P., (2015) The effects of reciprocal and self–check teaching styles in students’ intrinsic– extrinsic motivation, enjoyment and autonomy in teaching traditional Greek dances. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. (JPES), 15(2), Art 53, pp. 352 - 361, DOI:10.7752/jpes.2015.02053

Beckett, K. (1991) The effects of two teaching styles on college students' achievement of selected physical education outcomes. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 10, 153-169.

Byra, M. (2006) Teaching styles and inclusive pedagogies. In Handbook of research in physical education, D. Kirk, M.O’Sullivan, & D. Macdonald (Eds.), SAGE Publications: London, pp.449-466.

Dudley, D., Okely, A., Pearson, P. and Cotton, W. (2011). A systematic review of the effectiveness of physical education and school sport interventions targeting physical activity, movement skills and enjoyment of physical activity. European Physical Education Review, 17(3), 353-378. doi: 10.1177/1356336X1141673

Elliott B. (2006) Biomechanics and tennis. Journal Sports Med; 40: 3926.

Fanarioti, M. (2014). The influence of direct and indirect teaching method in the development of selected technical skills in the sport of football to children aged 12-14 years old. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 14(3), 413-420. doi: 10.7752/jpes.2014.03063

Fitri Amalia, James Tangkudung dan Firmansyah Dlis (2018) The Effect of Teaching Styles and Coordination to the Learning Resul of Table Tenis. Journal of Indonesian Physical Education and Sport. 4 (1) 35-45 http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jipes

Filipcic A, Filipcic T. The relationship of tennis-specific motor abilities and the competition efficiency of young female tennis players. Kinesiology 2005; 372: 167-72.

Goldberger, M., & Gerney, P. The effects of direct teaching styles on motor skill acquisition of fifth grade children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, (1986), 57, 215-219.

Goldberger, M., Gerney, P., & Chamberlain, J. The effects of three styles of teaching on the psychomotor performance of fifth grade children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, (1982), 53, 116-124.

Iino Y, Kojima T. Kinematics of table tennis topspin forehands: effects of performance level and ball spin. J Sports Sci 2009;27:1311-21. http://bit.ly/1D9uenA

Ismaryati. (2006). Tes dan Pengukuran Olahraga. Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University Press

Jannapureddy S. dkk, 2015. Timing Differences in Eye-Hand Coordination Between Experienced and Inexperienced Tennis Players.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275155619

Maria Cuellar-Moreno (2016) Effects of the command and mixed styles on student learning in primary education. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 16 (4) 1159-1169. DOI:10.7752/jpes.2016.04186

Magethi, Bey, 1990. Tenis Para Bintang. Bandung: Pioner Jaya.

Mavvidis A, Koronas K, Riaganas C, Metaxas T. (2005). Speed differences between forehand and backhand in intermediate-level tennis players. Kinesiology; 37(2): 159-63.

McPherson SL. (2000) Expert-novice differences in planning strategies during collegiate singles tennis competition. J Sport Exer Psych;22:39-62. http://bit.ly/1Cyy4E0

Mosston, M. & Ashworth, S. (2002).Teaching Physical Education. (5th Ed), Benjamin Cummins: San Francisco CA,

Mosston ans Sara Asworth. (2008). Teaching Physical Education, (Online Edition), New York: MacMillan College Publising Company Inc.

Rodriguez ST, Vickers JN, Williams AM. (2002) Head, eye and arm coordination in table tennis. J Sports Sci;20:187-200. http://bit.ly/1alghZo

Safari A., Suherman, and M Ali (2017) The Effect of Exercise Method and Hand-Eye Coordination Towards the Accuracy of Forehand Topspin in Table Tennis. 1st Annual Applied Science and Engineering Conference. IOP Publishing. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/180/1/012207

Sailer U, Flanagan JR, Johansson RS. (2005). Eye-hand coordination during learning of a novel visuomotor task. J Neurosci; 25

Schöborn R. (2000) Advanced techniques for competitive tennis. Oxford: Meyer&Meyer Sport.

Singer R, Cauraugh J, Chen D, Steinberg G, Frehlich S. (1996) Visual search, anticipation, and reactive comparisons between highly-skilled and beginning tennis players. Journal Applied Sports Psych; 8:9-26. http://bit.ly/1HitlMr

Syahruddi (2016) The Effect Of Exercise Style Of Teaching And Command Styles Of Teaching To Over Passing Of Skills Volly ball. Jurnal Pedagogik Keolahragaan. 2 (1) 11-22

Yani Mulyani dan Juliska Gracinia (2007) .Kemampuan Fisik, Seni dan Manajemen Diri. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Kompentindo.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-27

Issue

Section

Research Papers

How to Cite

Maulidin, M., Syah, H., & Primayanti, I. (2020). Pengaruh Gaya Mengajar dan Koordinasi Mata-Tangan terhadap Keterampilan Dasar Forehand Tenis. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 4(2), 126-133. https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v4i2.199