Penyelenggaraan Praktikum Pola Blok 1 X 10 dan 10 X 1 sebagai Acuan Kebijakan Praktikum Laboratorium IPA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v4i2.251Keywords:
Efektivitas, praktikum, pola blok 1 x 10, pola 10 x 1, preferensi, Effectiveness, practicum, 1 x 10 block pattern, 10 x 1 block pattern, preferenceAbstract
Salah satu rekomendasi asesor pada visitasi BAN PT dalam rangka Akreditasi Jurusan Tadris IPA Biologi, Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Mataram adalah praktikum Laboratorium IPA dilakukan dengan pola 10x1, sementara penyelenggaraan praktikum yang umum dilaksanakan adalah pola blok 1x10. Tujuan penelitian eksperimental ini adalah menguji efektivitas penyelenggaraan praktikum pola blok 1x10 dan 10x1 sebagai acuan kebijakan praktikum Laboratorium IPA. Efektivitas dilihat dari tiga komponen, yaitu: nilai tes praktikum, nilai laporan praktikum, dan preferensi praktikan dan co-asisten terhadap salah satu pola praktikum. Penelitian dilakukan pada mahasiswa Jurusan S1 PGMI Semester II, Jurusan Tadris IPA Biologi Semester IV, dan Co-Asisten. Rancangan penelitian adalah quasi eksperimental dengan tipe Pre-test–postest Non-Equivalen pada sampel yang diambil secara cluster random sampling. Data dikumpulkan dengan teknik tes, angket, dan wawancara untuk kemudian dianalisis dengan statistik inferensial pada taraf signifikansi 0,05. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, bahwa nilai tes dan nilai laporan praktikum mahasiswa yang mengikuti praktikum pola blok 10 x 1 lebih tinggi dibanding 1 x 10, tetapi tidak berbeda secara signifikan. Berdasarkan analisis diperoleh 96% mahasiswa lebih menyukai pola praktikum 10 x 1. Dengan demikian, ditinjau dari hasil, salah satu pola praktikum tidak ada yang lebih efektif dibanding yang lain.
Organizing Practicum of 1 X 10 and 10 X 1 Block Patterns as a Reference for Science Laboratory Practicum Policy
Abstract
One of the recommendations from BAN PT assessors during the visitation in the Accreditation of Department of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training is that practicum at Natural Science Laboratory should be administered in a 10x1 block pattern, while the general administration of practicum pattern is a 1x10 block pattern. This experiment aimed at investigating the effectiveness of the administration of the 1x10 and 10x1 block practicum patterns. The effectiveness was sought out by assessing three components, namely: practicum test scores, practicum report scores and the preferences of practicants and co-assistants to one of the practicum patterns. The participants of this study were the second year undergraduate students of elemetary Education Department and the fourh year undergraduate students of Natural Science Education Department, and co-sssistants. This study was of quasi-experiment using Non-Equivalent Pre-test-postest design and the sample was taken using cluster random sampling technique. The data were collected through test, questionnaire, and interview and then they were analyzed using inferential statistics at the 0.05. significance level. The findings showed that the test and practicum report scores of the students who joined the 10 x 1 block practicum pattern were higher than those who joined 1 x 10 block practicum pattern, yet they did not differ significantly. Based on the analysis, 96% of the students obviously preferred the 10 x 1 block practicum pattern. Thus, based on the results, no one practicum pattern was more effective than the other.
Downloads
References
Abruscato. (2014). Teaching Children Science: A Discovery Approach. New York: Allyn and Bacon.
Ali, L. U. (2018). Pengelolaan pembelajaran IPA Ditinjau dari hakikat sains pada SMP di Kabupaten Lombok Timur. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 6(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v6i2.1020
Carin. (1999). Teaching Modern Science. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Hodson, D. (1996). Practical work in school science: Exploring some directions for change. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 755–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180702
Hudha, A. M. (2011). Analisis pengelolaan praktikum biologi di laboratorium biologi. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pemikiran Pendidikan, 1(1), 37–51.
Istiana, N., Sarwi, & Masturi. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif STAD untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep dan Keterampilan Proses Belajar Fisika. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 5(1).
Machin, A. (2014). Implementasi pendekatan saintifik, penanaman karakter dan konservasi pada pembelajaran materi pertumbuhan. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3(1), 28–35.
Mao, S.-L., & Chang, C.-Y. (1998). Impacts of an inquiry teaching method on earth science students’ learning outcomes and attitudes at the secondary school level. Proc. Natl. Sci. Counc. ROC(D), 8(3), 93–101.
Marcella, Z., Susanti, N., & Dani, R. (2018). Analisis hambatan pelaksanaan praktikum IPA terpadu di SMPN 17 dan SMPN 19 Kota Jambi. Jurnal EduFisika, 3(2), 42–48.
McDermott, L. C. (1990). A perspective on teacher preparation in physics and other sciences: The need for special science courses for teachers. American Journal of Physics, 58(8), 734–742. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16395
Nugent, G., Kunz, G., Levy, R., Harwood, D., & Carlson, D. (2008). The impact of a field-based, inquiry-focused model of instruction on preservice teachers’ science learning and attitudes. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 12(2), 1–18.
Padmawinata. (1981). Manajemen Laboratorium IPA Sekolah. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
Parjatmo, Anna, & Krisna. (1997). Panduan Praktikum Biologi Umum. Bandung: Penerbit Angkasa.
Rochmawati, A., Wiyanto, & Ridlo, S. (2019). Analysis of 21 st Century Skills of Student on Implementation Project Based Learning and Problem Posing Models in Science Learning. Journal of Primary Education, 9(1), 58–67.
Ruse, M. (2012). What the philosophy of biology is: essays dedicated to David Hull. Springer Science & Business Media.
Siburian, F., Sinambela, M., & Septie. (2014). Analisis Pelaksanaan Praktikum pada Mata Pelajaran Biologi. Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, 5(2), 21–31.
Sudarisman, S. (2015). Memahami Hakikat Dan Karakteristik Pembelajaran Biologi Dalam Upaya Menjawab Tantangan Abad 21 Serta Optimalisasi Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Florea : Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 2(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.25273/florea.v2i1.403
Suryaningsih, Y. (2017). Pembelajaran Berbasis Praktikum sebagai Sarana Berlatih Menerapkan Keterampilan Proses Sains. Jurnal Bio Educatio, 2, 49–57.
Susanti, M., Rusilowati, A., & Susanto, H. (2015). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar IPA Berbasis Literasi Sains Bertema Listrik dalam Kehidupan unruk Kelas IX. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 4(3).
Trnova, E., & Trna, J. (2015). Formation of Science Concepts in Pre-school Science Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197(February), 2339–2346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.264
Trumper, R. (2002). What do we expect from students’ physics laboratory experiments? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(3), 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016016417872
Tuckman. (1978). Conducting Educational Research. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Vyjantimala, Lum, Mui, & Hong. (2002). Science Exploration. Singapura: Oxford University Press.
Wijaya. (2002). Analisis SPSS: Statistik Parametrik. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
