The Role of Gamification in English Language Teaching: Insights from Pre-Service Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v9i1.2644Keywords:
Gamification, Engagement, Motivation, Pre-service Teacher, Gamified LearningAbstract
Gamification has emerged as an innovative approach to English language teaching, aiming to enhance student engagement and motivation. This study investigates pre-service teachers' perceptions of gamification in English language teaching practice. This study employed a mixed method based on an explanatory-sequential design as qualitative can clarify generalized quantitative results in a more thorough and appropriate interpretation. The study began by gathering quantitative data through a Likert scale questionnaire, followed by collecting qualitative data through semi-structured interviews with 100 pre-service teachers from Universitas Brawijaya post-teaching practice. The findings show that most pre-service teachers perceive gamification in English language teaching positively. Specifically, 89% of respondents reported increased engagement, while 85% noted improved motivation and focus. However, 15% of respondents remained ambivalent about how well gamification encourages self-directed learning. Additionally, 87% of respondents plan to continue using gamification in their teaching. In conclusion, gamification has the potential to be an innovative pedagogical approach in English language teaching, not only by enhancing engagement and motivation but also by facilitating differentiated learning by enabling students to gain the material at their own pace and fostering an immersive learning environment that enhances language acquisition. However, some challenges, such as limited infrastructure and pre-service knowledge and readiness to implement learning technology still need to be improved. Therefore, this study provides recommendations for educational institutions that can support the optimization of gamification in the context of English language teaching in the future. Further studies could explore its long-term effects on language learning to better understand its sustained impact.
Downloads
References
Acosta-Medina, J. K., Torres-Barreto, M. L., & Ca?rdenas-Parga, A. F. (2021). Students’ preference for the use of gamification in virtual learning environments. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(4), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6512
Arufe-Giráldez, V., Sanmiguel-Rodríguez, A., Ramos-Álvarez, O., & Navarro-Patón, R. (2022).
Gamification in Physical Education: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 12(8), 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080540
Atabek, O. (2019). Challenges in integrating technology into education. Turkish Studies- Information Technologies and Applied Sciences, 14(1), 1–19. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.14810
Belda-Medina, J., & Calvo-Ferrer, J. R. (2022). Preservice Teachers’ Knowledge and Attitudes toward Digital-Game-Based Language Learning. Education Sciences, 12(3), 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030182
Blume, C. Games People (Don’t) Play: An Analysis of Pre-Service EFL Teachers’ Behaviors and Beliefs Regarding Digital Game-Based Language Learning. Computer Assist. Lang. Learn. 2020, 33, 109–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1552599
Borrás-Gené, O., Martínez-Núñez, M., & Martín-Fernández, L. (2019). Enhancing fun through gamification to improve engagement in MOOC. Informatics, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics6030028
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2012) Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T.
Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57-71). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Buckley, P., & Doyle, E. (2014). Gamification and student motivation. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1162–1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.964263
Campillo-Ferrer, J.-M., Miralles-Marti?nez, P., & Sa?nchez-Iba?n?ez, R. (2020). Gamification in Higher Education: Impact on Student Motivation and the Acquisition of Social and Civic Key Competencies. Sustainability, 12(12), 4822. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124822
Chen, H.H.-J.; Chen, M.-P.; Chen, N.-S.; Yang, C. Pre-Service Teachers’ Views on Using Adventure Video Games for Language Learning. In Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Games Based Learning, Cork, Ireland, 4–5 October 2012; pp. 125–130
Christopoulos, A., & Mystakidis, S. (2023). Gamification in Education. Encyclopedia, 3(4), 1223-1243. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3040089.
Creswell, J.W. and Plano Clark, V.L. (2011) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd Edition, Sage Publications, Los Angeles.
C??nar, A., Eris?en, Y., & C?eliko?z, M. (2022). A Mixed-Method Research on the Effectiveness of Using Gamification Elements in an Online English Course. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 7(4), 280-291.https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.1140960
Daniela, L, & Žogla, I. (2013). Future teachers’ views on using digital media in teaching. In D. Parmigiani, V. Pennazio, & A. Traverso (Eds.), Learning & teaching with media & technology. ATEESIREM Winter conference proceedings (pp. 21–29). ATEE aisbl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09512-7
Deterding, Sebastian. (2012). Gamification: Designing for motivation. interactions. 19. 14–17. 10.1145/2212877.2212883. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2212877.2212883
Dhanapati Subedi. Explanatory Sequential Mixed Method Design as the Third Research Community of Knowledge Claim. American Journal of Educational Research. 2016; 4(7):570-577. doi: 10.12691/education-4-7-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.12691/education-4-7-10
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., and Nacke, L. (2011). “From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining” gamification,” in Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments, (New York, NY: ACM). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2212877.2212883
Fokides, E., & Kostas, A. (2020). Pre-service teachers and computers: a (still) troubled relationship. In L. Tomei & D. Carbonara (Eds.), Handbook of research on diverse teaching strategies for the technology rich classroom (pp. 15–31). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0238-9.ch002
Ertmer, P. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597
Guerrero Puerta, L. (2024). Exploring if Gamification Experiences Make an Impact on Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions of Future Gamification Use: A Case Report. Societies, 14(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14010011
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. 2014. “Does Gamification Work? – A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification”. Dalam Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA, January 6-9, 2014
Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & Education, 80, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019
Hungpungwo Ringphaso Zimik, Nafis Mahmud Khan, and Budi Waluyo, "Game On! The Effectiveness of Gamified Approaches in Thai Higher Education," International Journal of Information and Education Technology vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1461-1470, 2024.
J. Martí-Parreño, E. Méndez-Ibáñez & A. Alonso-Arroyo. (2016). The Use of Gamification in Education: a Bibliometric and Text Mining Analysis. Journal of Computer- Assisted Learning, 32(6), 663- 676. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12161
Jose B, Cherian J, Jaya PJ, Kuriakose L and Leema PWR (2024) The ghost eect: how gamification can hinder genuine learning. Front. Educ. 9:1474733. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1474733
Kaimara, P., Fokides, E., Oikonomou, A. et al. Potential Barriers to the Implementation of Digital Game-Based Learning in the Classroom: Pre-service Teachers’ Views. Tech Know Learn 26, 825–844 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09512-7
K?yanc?ic?ek, E. & Uzun, L. (2022). Gamification in English Language Classrooms: The Case of Kahoot![I?ngilizce Dil S?n?flar?nda Oyunlas?t?rma: Kahoot! O?rneg?i]. Bilim, Eg?itim, Sanat ve Teknoloji Dergisi (BEST Dergi) [Science, Education, Art and Technology Journal (SEAT Journal)], 6(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.46328/bestdergi.63
Mee Mee, Rita & Tengku Shahdan, Tengku & Ismail, Md Rosli & Ghani, Khatipah & Seong Pek, Lim & Wong, Yeevon & Woo, Adelaide & Rao, Yugeshineey. (2020). Role of gamification in classroom teaching: Pre-service teachers’ view. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE). http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i3.20622
Natalia Padilla-Zea, Daniel Burgos, Greg Holloway, Joseph Cullen. Social interaction and gamification with youth at risk of social exclusion: The technological approach of the Keystone project. Entertainment Computing, 2022; 43(1):100502. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2022.100502
Petkov P, Köbler F, Foth M, Medland RC, Krcmar H (2011) Engaging energy saving through motivation-specific social comparison. In: Proc conference on human factors in computing systems, Vancouver, pp 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979855
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Sailer, M., & Sailer, M. (2021). Gamification of in-class activities in flipped classroom lectures. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12948
S.Bennett, A.Bishop, B. Dalgarno, J. Waycott, G. Kennedy, Implementing Web 2.0 technologies in higher education: A collective case study, Computers & Education 59 (2) (2012) 524 - 534 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.022
Sánchez-Mena, A., & Martí-Parreño, J. (2017). Drivers and barriers to adopting gamification: Teachers Perspectives. The Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 15(5), 434–443.
Thiagarajah, K., Ng, M. M., Jeyaraja, S. S. B., Gunasehgaran, V., & Maniam, M. (2022). Effectiveness of Gamification Tool in Teaching Vocabulary. International Journal of Academic Research inBusiness and Social Sciences, 12(9), 1046 – 1063. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i9/14604
Van Eck, R. N., Guy, M., Young, T., Winger, A. T., & Brewster, S. (2015). Project NEO: A video game to promote STEM competency for preservice elementary teachers. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 20(3), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-015-9245-9
Veljkovi? Michos, M. (2017). Gamification in Foreign Language Teaching: Do You Kahoot?. Paper presented at Sinteza 2017 - International Scientific Conference on Information Technology and Data Related Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15308/Sinteza-2017-511-516
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Putri Monica Siregar, Putu Dian Dananyanti Degeng

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

