Digitalization of Teacher Performance Evaluation through a Web-Based APIPA Model to Realize Impactful Learning in Junior High Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v9i2.2875Keywords:
Digitalization, APIPA Model, Teacher Performance Evaluation, Impactful Learning, Teacher ReflectionAbstract
This study aims to examine the effectiveness of the web-based APIPA (Assessment, Planning, Implementation, Product, Appreciation) evaluation model in improving mathematics teachers' performance and exploring its relationship with the effectiveness of impactful learning at the junior high school level. The method used is mixed methods with an explanatory sequential design. Quantitative data were collected through pretest-posttest and analyzed using descriptive statistics, Shapiro-Wilk normality test, paired samples t-test, and N-Gain. Further analysis used Rasch Model and structural equation modeling (SmartPLS 4) to assess the validity of the instruments and the relationship between the model dimensions. Meanwhile, qualitative data were obtained through in-depth interviews and analyzed using NVivo to uncover teachers' instructional reflections on the implementation of the model. The results showed that the web-based APIPA model effectively improved teachers' performance significantly on all indicators (t = -88.7; p < 0.001). The average N-Gain value of 0.3860 indicates moderate and uniform improvement. Rasch analysis shows that the instrument has high structural validity, homogeneous score distribution, and is free from participant bias. Path analysis reveals interactions between model dimensions that reinforce each other in supporting impactful learning. Additionally, differences in instructional reflection between high- and low-scoring teachers suggest that this model also functions as a catalyst for the formation of evaluative awareness. The conclusions of this study affirm that the APIPA model is not merely an evaluation tool but also a reflective-transformational framework capable of driving improvements in the quality of digital, systemic, and sustainable learning.
Downloads
References
Andersson, C., & Palm, T. (2018). Reasons for teachers’ successful development of a formative assessment practice through professional development – a motivation perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 576–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1430685
Astutik, E. P., Zaman, A. Q., Satianingsih, R., Khabib, S., Rohmah, N., Hanindita, A. W., Fauziyah, F., Kurniawan, W. O., Athoillah, M., & Rosmiati, R. (2025). Evaluasi Kinerja Guru Pamong: Kontribusi, Tantangan, dan Peningkatan Strategi dalam Mendukung Pendidikan Abad ke-21. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Indonesia (JPPI), 5(1), 402–413. https://doi.org/10.53299/jppi.v5i1.1034
Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
Ayaz, M., & Gök, B. (2023). The effect of e-portfolio application on reflective thinking and learning motivation of primary school teacher candidates. Current Psychology, 42(35), 31646–31662. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04135-2
Becker, M., & Tetzner, J. (2021). On the relations of sociocognitive childhood characteristics, education, and socioeconomic success in adulthood. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 67, 102024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102024
Brookhart, S. M. (2024). Educational Assessment Knowledge and Skills for Teachers Revisited. Education Sciences, 14(7), 751. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070751
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
Feng, J., Yu, B., Tan, W. H., Dai, Z., & Li, Z. (2025). Key factors influencing educational technology adoption in higher education: A systematic review. PLOS Digital Health, 4(4), e0000764. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000764
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Hang, N. T. (2024). The role of adoption, ease of use and teachers experience of artificial intelligence on teaching effectiveness: Moderating role of student interest. Journal of Pedagogical Research. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202428342
Hattie, J. (2023). Visible Learning: The Sequel A Synthesis of Over 2,100 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003380542
Havu-Nuutinen, S., Kärkkäinen, S., & Keinonen, T. (2018). Changes in primary school pupils’ conceptions of water in the context of Science, Technology, and Society (STS) instruction. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 27(2), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2017.1320897
Heil, J., & Ifenthaler, D. (2023). Online Assessment in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Online Learning, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3398
Ibda, H., Syamsi, I., & Rukiyati, R. (2023). Professional elementary teachers in the digital era: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(1), 459–467. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i1.23565
Khong, H., Celik, I., Le, T. T. T., Lai, V. T. T., Nguyen, A., & Bui, H. (2023). Examining teachers’ behavioural intention for online teaching after COVID-19 pandemic: A large-scale survey. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5999–6026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11417-6
König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: Teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650
Lavoie, C., Dufour, M., Berbiche, D., Therriault, D., & Lane, J. (2023). The relationship between problematic internet use and anxiety disorder symptoms in youth: Specificity of the type of application and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 140, 107604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107604
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
Masaeed, M. J. N., Shehada, S. A. J., & Mersal, M. A. S. (2025). The effect of digital transformation on teacher performance evaluation in Palestinian schools. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1440731
Notanubun, Z. (2019). Pengembangan Kompetensi Profesionalisme Guru di Era Digital (Abad 21). Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling Terapan, 3(2), 54. https://doi.org/10.30598/jbkt.v3i2.1058
OECD. (2020). TALIS 2018 Results (Volume II): Teachers and School Leaders as Valued Professionals. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/19cf08df-en
OECD. (2023a). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
OECD. (2023b). PISA 2022 Results (Volume II). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/a97db61c-en
Pham, Q. H., & Vu, K. P. (2024). Leveraging lecturers’ intelligence for student engagement enrichment in blended learning courses. Cogent Education, 11(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2334930
Pralaya, G., & Setiawan, H. (2024). Sistem Penilaian terhadap Kinerja Guru Berbasis Web (Studi Kasus: SMP Negeri 2 Sukodono). Physical Sciences, Life Science and Engineering, 1(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.47134/pslse.v1i2.202
Putri Suci Ramadhan, Desi Fitri Yani Sembiring, Ella Nurmaini, Dessy Masliani Lubis, & Muhammad Iqbal. (2024). Evaluasi Penilaian Kinerja Guru dan Sistem Pembelajaran. Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal, 5(3), 3874–3880. https://doi.org/10.54373/imeij.v5i3.1450
Reeves, T. C. (2000). Alternative Assessment Approaches for Online Learning Environments in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(1), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.2190/GYMQ-78FA-WMTX-J06C
Sendo, E. G., Teshome, G. S., Jirata, W. K., Gebrewold, L. A., & Gemechu, R. E. (2025). Effect of “Helping Babies Breathe” Training on Ethiopian Undergraduate Midwifery Students’ Knowledge and Skills in Neonatal Resuscitation at Public Universities: A Non-Randomized Quasi-Experimental Study. Sage Open, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251316932
Siyam, Y., Siyam, N., Hussain, M., & Alqaryouti, O. (2025). Evaluating technology integration in education: A framework for professional development. Discover Education, 4(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00448-z
Timperley, H., & Alton-Lee, A. (2008). Reframing Teacher Professional Learning: An Alternative Policy Approach to Strengthening Valued Outcomes for Diverse Learners. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 328–369. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07308968
van der Linden, S., Papadopoulos, P. M., Nieveen, N., & McKenney, S. (2023). ReflAct: Formative assessment for teacher reflection in video-coaching settings. Computers & Education, 203, 104843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104843
Vattøy, K.-D., & Gamlem, S. M. (2024). Navigating formative assessment as professional development in digital contexts: Insights from teachers’ experiences. Teacher Development, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2024.2382956
Vermeulen, M., Kreijns, K., & Evers, A. T. (2022). Transformational leadership, leader–member exchange and school learning climate: Impact on teachers’ innovative behaviour in the Netherlands. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 50(3), 491–510. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220932582
Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010
Zhang, K. (2025). Teacher adoption of digital education management systems through combined information systems and social cognitive frameworks during post-COVID era. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 16810. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01552-8
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Syahrir Syahrir, Adi Apriadi Adiansha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
