Argument-Driven Inquiry Assisted by Lumi Education: Improving Students' Scientific Argumentation Skills on Static Electricity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/70dd6197Keywords:
Argument-Driven Inquiry, Scientific Argumentation Skills, Inquiry Learning, Science Education, Lumi EducationAbstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) learning strategy, supported by the Lumi Education platform, in enhancing the scientific argumentation skills of students related to static electricity. A quasi-experimental approach, employing a non-equivalent control group, was adopted in this study, including two ninth-grade classes in a junior high school as participants. The participants were exposed to instruction utilizing either the ADI strategy and the support of the Lumi Education website or standard instruction as a control group. The strategies developed included a scientific argumentation skills test, designed as a claim, evidence, and warrant procedure, as well as a questionnaire administered among students. The data gathered were statistically processed by comparing pre-test and post-test results, calculating the normalized gains, as well as a description analysis approach among the students' written responses. The results show that, compared to a low category average normalization gain of 0.18 among the control class, a significantly high average value, 0.70, was established by the experimental class, signifying a statistically significant difference between the two categories, yielding a significance at a probability value less than 0.001. The results among the experimental class developed a Cohen's value, or the standardized effect size, estimated as 0.53, signifying a medium effect, while among the control class, an estimated 0.11, signifying a small effect, was recognized. Students said they liked the learning experience and thought it was more interesting, dynamic, and simpler to comprehend when they worked together on real-world tasks. However, some still encountered difficulties with conceptual comprehension and problem-solving. These findings imply that integrating ADI with digital scaffolding, such as Lumi Education, can effectively strengthen scientific argumentation skills while promoting active and reflective learning.
Downloads
References
Acosta-Gonzaga, E., & Ramirez-Arellano, A. (2022). Scaffolding Matters? Investigating Its Role in Motivation, Engagement and Learning Achievements in Higher Education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(20), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013419
Admoko, S., Hanifah, N., Suprapto, N., Hariyono, E., & Madlazim, M. (2021). The implementation of Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) learning model to improve scientific argumentation skills of high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1747(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012046
Aldahmash, A. H., & Omar, S. H. (2021). Analysis of activities included in Saudi Arabian chemistry textbooks for the inclusion of argumentation-driven inquiry skills. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68(July 2020), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100968
Alfarraj, Y. F., Aldahmash, A. H., & Omar, S. H. (2023). Teachers’ perspectives on teaching science through an argumentation-driven inquiry model: A mixed-methods study. Heliyon, 9(9), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19739
Anazifa, R. D., Paidi, P., Pratama, A. T., & Kurniawati, A. (2024). Development of argument-driven inquiry model with blended learning approach in environmental science course. Research and Development in Education (RaDEn), 4(2), 1460–1472. https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v4i2.35874
Arslan, H. O., Genc, M., & Durak, B. (2023). Exploring the effect of argument-driven inquiry on pre-service science teachers’ achievement, science process, and argumentation skills and their views on the ADI model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 121(August), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103905
Bailey, R. L., Kiesel, V. A., Lobene, A. J., & Zou, P. (2020). Redesigning an Undergraduate Nutrition Course through Active Learning and Team-Based Projects Enhances Student Performance. Current Developments in Nutrition, 4(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/CDN/NZAA039
Canoz, G. M., Ucar, S., & Demircioglu, T. (2022). Investigate the effect of argumentation-promoted interactive simulation applications on students’ argumentation levels, academic achievements, and entrepreneurship skills in science classes. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45(March), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101106
Clevenger, L., Teshera-Levye, J., Walker, J. P., & Vance-Chalcraft, H. D. (2023). Using an Observation Protocol To Evaluate Student Argumentation Skills in Introductory Biology Laboratories. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 24(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00209-22
Coletta, V. P., & Steinert, J. J. (2020). Why normalized gain should continue to be used in analyzing preinstruction and postinstruction scores on concept inventories. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010108
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. In H. Salmon (Ed.), Writing Center Talk over Time: A Mixed-Method Study (5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429469237
Depany, P. D., & Sukardiyono, S. (2023). Penerapan Media Pembelajaran Fisika Lumi Education Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dan Komunikasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 10(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpf.v10i1.19458
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012
Fajardo, M. B., & Apellido, E. D. (2025). Development and Evaluation of Interactive Self- learning Materials ( iSLeM ) Using Lumi Application?: Enhancing Student Engagement and Learning Outcomes in Computer System Servicing. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation, 03(02), 171–198. https://philpapers.org/rec/FAJDAE
Fuadah, M. I., Mubarok, H., & Suliyanah, S. (2023). The Effect of Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) Model on the Scientific Argumentation Ability of High School Students on the Topic of Light Waves. International Journal of Research and Community Empowerment, 1(2), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.58706/ijorce.v1n2.p53-61
Grooms, J., Enderle, P., & Sampson, V. (2015). Coordinating Scientific Argumentation and the Next Generation Science Standards through Argument Driven Inquiry What Is Scientific Argumentation and Why Is It important in Science? Science Educator, 24(1), 45–50.
Hake, R. R. (2002). Relationship of individual student normalized learning gains in mechanics with gender, high-school physics, and pretest scores on Mathematics and Spatial Visualization. Physics Education Research Conference, 8(August 2002), 1–14. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=10EI2q8AAAAJ&citation_for_view=10EI2q8AAAAJ:IjCSPb-OGe4C
Hasanah, F., Putra, P. D. A., & Rusdianto. (2022). Identifikasi Kemampuan Siswa SMP dalam Berargumentasi Melalui Pendekatan Pembelajaran Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika (JLPF), 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.30872/jlpf.v3i1.974
Hendratmoko, A. F., Madlazim, M., Widodo, W., & Astutik, S. (2024). Debate Based on Inquiry Learning (DBOIL): An Innovative Learning Model to Improve Student’s Skills Scientific Argumentation. Debate Based on Inquiry Learning (DBOIL): An Innovative Learning Model to Improve Students’ Skills in Scientific Argumentation, 13(4), 3295–3303. doi: 10.18421/TEM134-64
Hendratmoko, A. F., Madlazim, M., Widodo, W., Suyono, S., & Supardi, Z. A. I. (2024). Inquiry and Debate in Science Learning?: Potential Strategy for Improving Students ’ Scientific Argumentation Skills To cite this article?: argumentation skills. International Journal of Education in Mathematics , Science , and Inquiry and Debate in Scie. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology 2024, 12(1), 114–138. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3152
Jacob, T., & Centofanti, S. (2024). Effectiveness of H5P in improving student learning outcomes in an online tertiary education setting. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 36(2), 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09361-6
Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(NOV), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
Lobczowski, N. G., Allen, E. M., Firetto, C. M., Greene, J. A., & Murphy, P. K. (2020). An exploration of social regulation of learning during scientific argumentation discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 63(10), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101925
Matana, M. D. S., Maryati, S., & Koem, S. (2024). Development of Lumi Education Learning Media Based on H5P for Atmospheric Dynamics Subject at Senior High School 1 Gorontalo Mohamat. Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi, 11(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.20527/jpg.v10i2.16278
Mazita, A., Siswanto Siswanto, Suwito Singgih, Nuryunita Dewantari, & Djoko Sri Bimo. (2024). Implementation of Argument Driven Inquiry Instructional Model to Improve Cognitive Learning Outcomes. Indonesian Journal of Science and Education, 8(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.31002/ijose.v8i1.1446
Mutawa, A. M., Al Muttawa, J. A. K., & Sruthi, S. (2023). The Effectiveness of Using H5P for Undergraduate Students in the Asynchronous Distance Learning Environment. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 13(8), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13084983
Nazidah, F., Kafii, M. S., & Admoko, S. (2022). Analisis Bibliometrik Penelitian Argumentasi Ilmiah dalam Pembelajaran Sains di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 Society 5.0. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 1(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.58706/jipp.v1n1.p7-14
Rapanta, C. (2021). Can teachers implement a student-centered dialogical argumentation method across the curriculum? Teaching and Teacher Education, 105(105), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103404
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Self-Determination-Theory/Ryan-Deci/9781462538966
Sampson, V., Enderle, P., Grooms, J., & Witte, S. (2013). Writing to learn by learning to write during the school science laboratory: Helping middle and high school students develop argumentative writing skills as they learn core ideas. Science Education, 97(5), 643–670. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21069
Santri, A., Asiyah, A., & Kusumah, R. G. T. (2023). ANALISIS KETERAMPILAN ARGUMENTASI PESERTA DIDIK DENGAN PENDEKATAN SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES (SSI) PADA MATA PELAJARAN IPA DI SMPN 01 PAJAR BULAN KABUPATEN SELUMA [UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu]. http://repository.uinfasbengkulu.ac.id/id/eprint/905
Satriya, M. A., & Atun, S. (2024). The Effect of Argument Driven Inquiry Learning Models on Scientific Argumentation Skills and Higher Order Students on The Topics of Acid Base. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5), 2663–2673. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.6834
Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). Very large and huge effect sizes. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(2), 597–599. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100
Sharmin, N., Houshyar, S., Stevenson, T. R., & Chow, A. K. (2025). Interactive Engagement with Self-Paced Learning Content in a Didactic Course. Healthcare Informatics Research, 31(1), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2025.31.1.96
Soegiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D (19th ed.). ALFABETA.
Stell, A., & Iwashita, N. (2024). Enhancing collaboration: Exploring regulated learning strategies in the co-regulatory processes of collaborative L2 writing. System, 125(103410), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103410
Su, Y., Liang, J. C., Zheng, C., & Tsai, C. C. (2023). Co-regulation strategies and their associations with writing self-efficacy in a computer-mediated collaborative writing setting. Journal of Second Language Writing, 59(10), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.100972
Sun, L., Kangas, M., Ruokamo, H., & Siklander, S. (2023). A systematic literature review of teacher scaffolding in game-based learning in primary education. Educational Research Review, 40(100546), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100546
Telenius, M., Yli-Panula, E., Vesterinen, V. M., & Vauras, M. (2020). Argumentation within upper secondary school student groups during virtual science learning: Quality and quantity of spoken argumentation. Education Sciences, 10(12), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120393
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument: Updated edition. In The Uses of Argument: Updated Edition. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005
Walker, J. P., & Sampson, V. (2013). Learning to argue and arguing to learn: Argument-driven inquiry as a way to help undergraduate chemistry students learn how to construct arguments and engage in argumentation during a laboratory course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(5), 561–596. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21082
Wambsganss, T., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2022). Enhancing argumentative writing with automated feedback and social comparison nudging. Computers and Education, 191(9), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104644
Widayanti, Y. (2023). Penerapan Video Interaktif Berbasis “Lumi Education” untuk Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Kimia Peserta Didik. Proceedings Series of Educational Studies National Conference from Magister of Education Management, 133–136.
Woods, P. J., & Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2024). Examining the role of student-centered versus teacher-centered pedagogical approaches to self-directed learning through teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 138(2), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104415
Yang, R. (2022). An empirical study on the scaffolding Chinese university students’ English argumentative writing based on toulmin model. Heliyon, 8(12), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12199
Yu, J., Kim, H., Zheng, X., Li, Z., & Xiangxiang, Z. (2024). Effects of scaffolding and inner speech on learning motivation, flexible thinking and academic achievement in the technology-enhanced learning environment. Learning and Motivation, 86(101982), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.101982
Yulia, Z. N. M. L., Triwahyudianto, T., Kumala, F. N., & Aiman, W. M. (2025). Interactive media based on project-based learning using Lumi Education for IPAS subjects in 4th-grade elementary school. Journal of Environment and Sustainability Education, 3(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.62672/joease.v3i1.40
Zabolotna, K., Malmberg, J., & Järvenoja, H. (2023). Examining the interplay of knowledge construction and group-level regulation in a computer-supported collaborative learning physics task. Computers in Human Behavior, 138(August 2022), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107494
Zairina, S., & Hidayati, S. N. (2022). Analisis Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa SMP Berbantuan Socio-Scientific Issue Pemanasan Global. PENSA E-Jurnal?: Pendidikan Sains, 10(1), 37–43. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/pensa
Zheng, X. L., Huang, J., Xia, X. H., Hwang, G. J., Tu, Y. F., Huang, Y. P., & Wang, F. (2023). Effects of online whiteboard-based collaborative argumentation scaffolds on group-level cognitive regulations, written argument skills and regulation patterns. Computers and Education, 207(August), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104920
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Putri Avianita Salsabila, Ahmad Fauzi Hendratmoko, Fikky Dian Roqobih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
