The Impact of Guided-Discovery-Learning Model on Students' Conceptual Understanding and Critical Thinking Skills
Downloads
How to Cite
The current study describes how the guided-discovery-learning model impacts students' conceptual understanding (SCU) and students’ critical thinking skills (SCTS) on the topic of solubility. The quasi-experimental research with a posttest-only nonequivalent control group design was used in this study. The experimental group (45 students) and the control group (47 students) were selected by the saturated sampling technique. Data on SCU was collected using an objective true false test instrument with correction/proofing, while data on critical thinking skills was collected using an essay test instrument. The research data were analyzed descriptively and statistically (Mann-Whitney U). The research found the SCU (mean= 81.51 vs. mean= 72.81) and SCTS (mean= 70.46 vs. mean= 58.43) in the experimental group was better than the control group, both descriptively and statistically (p < 0.05). These findings indicate that the guided-discovery-learning model significantly impacted SCU and SCTS on the solubility topic.
Adnyana, G. P. (2012). Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa pada Model Siklus Belajar Hipotetis Deduktif. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 45(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppundiksha.v45i3.1833
Aikenhead, G. S. (2003). Chemistry and physics instruction: Integration, ideologies, and choices. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 4(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1039/B2RP90041F
Andayani, Y., Zulkarnain, Z., & Hadisaputra, S. (2020). Promoting critical thinking skills of chemistry learning students using preparing doing concluding (PDC) learning models. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(4), 042116. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042116
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives (Complete ed). Longman.
Arends, R. (2012). Learning to teach (9th ed). McGraw-Hill.
Arifin, S., Wahyudin, W., & Herman, T. (2020). The effects of contextual group guided discovery learning on students' mathematical understanding and reasoning. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 8(2), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v8i2.33059
Arsal, Z. (2017). The impact of inquiry-based learning on the critical thinking dispositions of pre-service science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(10), 1326–1338. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1329564
Arya Wulandari, I. G. A. P., Sa’dijah, C., As’ari, A. R., & Rahardjo, S. (2018). Modified Guided Discovery Model: A conceptual Framework for Designing Learning Model Using Guided Discovery to Promote Student's Analytical Thinking Skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028, 012153. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012153
Asy’ari, M., Fitriani, H., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2019). The Science Process Skills of Prospective Biology Teachers in Plant Cell Material Based on Gender. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 14(19), 168. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i19.11208
Asy’ari, M., Hidayat, S., & Muhali, M. (2019). Prototipe buku ajar fisika dasar reflektif-integratif berbasis problem solving untuk meningkatkan pengetahuan metakognisi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i2.27089
Asy’ari, M., Ikhsan, M., & Muhali, M. (2019). The Effectiveness of Inquiry Learning Model in Improving Prospective Teachers' Metacognition Knowledge and Metacognition Awareness. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12229a
Asy’ari, M., Prayogi, S., Mirawati, B., Syarifuddin, Hunaepi, Syahrir, & Suhirman. (2021). Development of physics learning tools based on inquiry to increase creative thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1816(1), 012094. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1816/1/012094
Ayodele, A. A., & Nasiru, O. I. (2021). Effect of guided-discovery technique on Colleges of Education Social Studies students' learning outcome. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 15(3), 390–396. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i3.20300
Bisson, M.-J., Gilmore, C., Inglis, M., & Jones, I. (2016). Measuring Conceptual Understanding Using Comparative Judgement. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 2(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0024-3
Borich, G. D. (2016). Observation Skills for Effective Teaching: Research-Based Practice (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315633206
Cardellini, L. (2012). Chemistry: Why the Subject is Difficult? Educación Química, 23, 305–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0187-893X(17)30158-1
Crooks, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2014). Defining and measuring conceptual knowledge in mathematics. Developmental Review, 34(4), 344–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2014.10.001
Demirhan, E., & Köklükaya, A. N. (2014). The Critical Thinking Dispositions of Prospective Science Teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1551–1555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.433
Eggen, P. D., & Kauchak, D. P. (2012). Strategies and models for teachers: Teaching content and thinking skills (6th ed). Pearson.
Ennis, R. H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 26(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews201126214
Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum: A Vision. Topoi, 37(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Research Findings and Recommendations. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED315423
Facione, P. A. (2020). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Measured Reasons LCC. https://www.insightassessment.com/wp-content/uploads/ia/pdf/whatwhy.pdf
Fadillah, A., Yennita, Y., & Sahal, M. (2018). The application of guided discovery learning model to improve students' critical thingking ability at the eighth grade students' of MTs Al-Huda Pekanbaru. Jurnal Geliga Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 6(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.31258/jgs.6.1.39-46
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Sodian, B., Hussmann, H., Pekrun, R., Neuhaus, B., Dorner, B., Pankofer, S., Fischer, M., Strijbos, J.-W., Heene, M., & Eberle, J. (2014). Scientific Reasoning and Argumentation: Advancing an Interdisciplinary Research Agenda in Education. Frontline Learning Research, 2(3), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i2.96
Fitriani, H., Asy’ari, M., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2019). Exploring the Prospective Teachers' Critical Thinking and Critical Analysis Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i3.19434
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed). McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
Freire, M., Talanquer, V., & Amaral, E. (2019). Conceptual profile of chemistry: A framework for enriching thinking and action in chemistry education. International Journal of Science Education, 41(5), 674–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1578001
Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206
Gelder, T. van. (2005). Teaching Critical Thinking: Some Lessons From Cognitive Science. College Teaching, 53(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.53.1.41-48
Großmann, N., & Wilde, M. (2019). Experimentation in biology lessons: Guided discovery through incremental scaffolds. International Journal of Science Education, 41(6), 759–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1579392
Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The Effects of Classroom Mathematics Teaching on Students' Learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 371–404). Information Age Pub.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
Holme, T. A., Luxford, C. J., & Brandriet, A. (2015). Defining Conceptual Understanding in General Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(9), 1477–1483. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00218
Hoy, A. W. (2013). Educational psychology (12th ed). Pearson.
Janssen, F. J. J. M., Westbroek, H. B., & van Driel, J. H. (2014). How to make guided discovery learning practical for student teachers. Instructional Science, 42(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9296-z
Kalyuga, S. (2013). Enhancing transfer by learning generalized domain knowledge structures. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(4), 1477–1493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-013-0176-3
Kemendikbud. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2018. Kemendikbud. https://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id/arsip/Permendikbud%20Nomor%2037%20Tahun%202018.pdf
Kibirige, I., & Maake, R. M. (2021). The effect of guided discovery instructional strategy on grade nine learners' performance in chemical reactions in Mankweng circuit, South Africa. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(2), 569. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1295
Kwan, Y. W., & Wong, A. F. L. (2015). Effects of the constructivist learning environment on students' critical thinking ability: Cognitive and motivational variables as mediators. International Journal of Educational Research, 70, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.02.006
Lay, A.-N., & Osman, K. (2018). Developing 21st Century Chemistry Learning through Designing Digital Games. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 4(1), 81–92.
Lee, J. S. Y., & Yeung, C. Y. (2021). Assisted discovery-based learning for literature studies. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1916567
Lilienfeld, S. O., Ammirati, R., & David, M. (2012). Distinguishing science from pseudoscience in school psychology: Science and scientific thinking as safeguards against human error. Journal of School Psychology, 50(1), 7–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.09.006
Moreno, R. (2010). Educational psychology. John Wiley & Sons.
Muhali, M. (2019). Pembelajaran Inovatif Abad Ke-21. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 3(2), 25. https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v3i2.126
Muhali, M. (2021). Pengaruh Implementasi Model Creative Problem Solving terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah, Keterampilan Proses Sains, dan Kesadaran Metakognisi Peserta Didik. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 9(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v9i1.4261
Muhali, M., Sukaisih, R., & Asy’ari, M. (2020). Implementasi model reflective-metacognitive learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis, keterampilan metakognisi dan kesadaran metakognisi. Empiricism Journal, 1(2), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.36312/ej.v1i2.337
Muhali, M., Yuanita, L., & Ibrahim, M. (2019). The Validity and Effectiveness of the Reflective-Metacognitive Learning Model to Improve Students' Metacognition Ability in Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 33–74. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2019.16.2.2
Muliyani, R. (2018). Signifikansi discovery learning vs guided discovery learning terhadap peningkatan pemahaman konsep. Gravity?: Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.30870/gravity.v4i1.3118
Murphy, C., Abu-Tineh, A., Calder, N., & Mansour, N. (2021). Teachers and students' views prior to introducing inquiry-based learning in Qatari science and mathematics classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 104, 103367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103367
National Research Council (Ed.). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.
NCATE. (2008). Professional Standards for the Accreditation of Teacher Preparation Institutions. In National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NJ3). National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED502043
Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to Reach Product Quality. In J. van den Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training (pp. 125–135). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4255-7_10
Noer, S. H. (2018). Guided discovery model: An alternative to enhance students' critical thinking skills and critical thinking dispositions. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v5i1.16809
O'Dwyer, L. M., Wang, Y., & Shields, K. A. (2015). Teaching for conceptual understanding: A cross-national comparison of the relationship between teachers' instructional practices and student achievement in mathematics. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-014-0011-6
Prayogi, S., & Verawati, N. N. S. P. (2020). The Effect of Conflict Cognitive Strategy in Inquiry-based Learning on Preservice Teachers' Critical Thinking Ability. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal), 0(21), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2020-021-pray
Prayogi, S., Yuanita, L., & Wasis. (2018). Critical Inquiry Based Learning: A Model of Learning to Promote Critical Thinking Among Prospective Teachers of Physic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(1), 43–56.
Preston, L., Harvie, K., & Wallace, H. (2015). Inquiry-based Learning in Teacher Education: A Primary Humanities Example. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(12). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n12.6
Ribeiro, M. A. P., & Pereira, D. C. (2013). Constitutive Pluralism of Chemistry: Thought Planning, Curriculum, Epistemological and Didactic Orientations. Science & Education, 22(7), 1809–1837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9434-4
Rittle-Johnson, B., Schneider, M., & Star, J. R. (2015). Not a One-Way Street: Bidirectional Relations Between Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge of Mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9302-x
Sari, R. Y., & Cahyo, H. N. (2020). Effectivity of Guided Discovery Learning with Concept Mapping to improve conceptual understanding in endocrine system material for grade XI science class. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1), 012077. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012077
Sari, U., & Güven, G. B. (2013). The Effect of Interactive Whiteboard Supported Inquiry-Based Learning on Achievement and Motivation in Physics and Views of Prospective Teachers Toward the Instruction. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(2), 110–143. https://doi.org/10.12973/nefmed204
Schmaltz, R. M., Jansen, E., & Wenckowski, N. (2017). Redefining Critical Thinking: Teaching Students to Think like Scientists. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00459
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed). Pearson.
Scriven, M., & Paul, R. M. (1987). Defining Critical Thinking. http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/defining-critical-thinking/766
Shamsuddeen, A., & Amina, H. (2016). Instructional Methods and Students' End of Term Achievement in Biology in Selected Secondary Schools in Sokoto Metropolis, Sokoto State Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(32), 198.
Shieh, C.-J., & Yu, L. (2016). A Study on Information Technology Integrated Guided Discovery Instruction towards Students' Learning Achievement and Learning Retention. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1554a
Sudria, I. B. N., Redhana, I. W., & Samiasih, L. (2011). Pengaruh pembelajaran interaktif laju reaksi berbantuan komputer terhadap hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 44(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppundiksha.v44i1.135
Suhirman, Prayogi, S., & Asy’ari, M. (2021). Problem-Based Learning with CharacterEmphasis and Naturalist Intelligence: Examining Students Critical Thinking and Curiosity. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 217–232.
Suparini, S., Rusdi, R., & Ristanto, R. H. (2020). Guided discovery-blended learning (GDBL) for critical thinking skill empowerment: A learning strategy in human excretory system. Biosfer, 13(2), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v13n2.266-279
Thaiposri, P., & Wannapiroon, P. (2015). Enhancing Students' Critical Thinking Skills through Teaching and Learning by Inquiry-based Learning Activities Using Social Network and Cloud Computing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2137–2144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.013
Thomas, G. P. (2012). Metacognition in science education: Past, present and future considerations. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Science Education. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7
Thomas, T. A. (2011). Developing First YearStudents’ Critical Thinking Skills. Asian Social Science, 7(4), p26. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n4p26
Treagust, D., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. (2003). The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1353–1368. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070306
Trninic, D. (2018). Instruction, repetition, discovery: Restoring the historical educational role of practice. Instructional Science, 46(1), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9443-z
Tsaparlis, G. (2018). Challenges, Barriers, and Achievements in Chemistry Education: The Case of Greece. In C. Cox & W. E. Schatzberg (Eds.), ACS Symposium Series (Vol. 1293, pp. 93–110). American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2018-1293.ch007
van der Graaf, J., Segers, E., & de Jong, T. (2020). Fostering integration of informational texts and virtual labs during inquiry-based learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101890
Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Nachdr.). Harvard Univ. Press.
Yerizon, Y., Putra, A. A., & Subhan, M. (2018). Mathematics Learning Instructional Development based on Discovery Learning for Students with Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Intelligence (Preliminary Research Stage). International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/2701
Yuliani, K., & Saragih, S. (2015). The Development of Learning Devices Based Guided Discovery Model to Improve Understanding Concept and Critical Thinking Mathematically Ability of Students at Islamic Junior High School of Medan. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(24), 116–128.
Živkovi?, S. (2016). A Model of Critical Thinking as an Important Attribute for Success in the 21st Century. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.034
Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2013). A review of research on metacognition in science education: Current and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 49(2), 121–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.847261
Copyright (c) 2021 Muhali Muhali, Binar Kurnia Prahani, Husni Mubarok, Nova Kurnia, Muhammad Asy’ari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
