Students’ Perceptions of Factors Influencing the Adoption and Use of ICT in Learning during COVID-19 at One Rural Based South African University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v6i2.660Keywords:
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Students’ perception, Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Teaching and LearningAbstract
This study examines students’ perceptions of factors influencing the adoption and use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in learning during Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) at one rural based South African University. To continue with learning under the COVID-19 pandemic conditions higher education institutions migrated to online teaching and learning platforms. The transition towards online learning took place in background where even prior COVID 19 most institutions were faced with the challenge of promoting students’ adoption and use of ICT in their learning. The Technology Acceptability Model (TAM) is an information system theory that looks at various individual aspects that influence actual technology usage and acceptance. As such, there is a growing research interest to explore students’ perceptions of factors that influence their use of ICT in their learning at higher education institutions subsequently studies that focuses on rural based context are still limited. Resultantly, guided by the theoretical constructs from the TAM this study applied a census approach and used a quantitative technique to examine the perception that affect students’ acceptance and use of ICT in their learning. The study discovered a significant correlation between attitude towards use (U), perceived ease of use (PEOU), behavioural intention (BI), and perceived usefulness (PU), all of which have a substantial impact on students' perceptions and acceptance of ICT use in their learning. Nonetheless, the results showed that no significant correlations exist between external variables (EV) and ICT actual system uses. Based on these findings, this study concluded that insights from the findings on students’ the adoption and use of ICT in learning is affected by several perceptions, behavioural intention, and perceived ease of use of technology. Such insights provide policy makers with an indication of students’ perceptions that should be considered when designing strategies an polices aimed at enhancing student’s adoption and use of technology in learning in rural based South Africa University during and post COVID-19 pandemic.
Downloads
References
Akpabio, E., & Ogiriki, I. B. (2017). Teachers use of information and communication technology (ICT) in teaching English language in senior secondary schools in Akwa Ibom state. Equatorial Journal of Education and Curriculum Studies, 2(2), 28-23.
Ankamah, S., Akussah, H., & Adams, M. (2018). Postgraduate Students’ perception Towards the Use of ICT in Research in Ghanaian Public Universities.
Bhero, S. (2012). Barriers to information and communication technology use University of Johannesburg].
Bickman, L., & Rog, D. J. (2008). The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods. Sage publications.
Biswas, B., Roy, S. K., & Roy, F. (2020). Students Perception of Mobile Learning during COVID-19 in Bangladesh: University Student Perspective.
Bora, S. P., & Teki, S. (2013). Students' Perception on Use of ICT in Higher Education with Reference to North Coastal Districts of Andhra Pradesh. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 2(5), 156.
Boulton, H. (2008). Managing e-Learning: What Are the Real Implications for Schools? Electronic Journal of E-learning, 6(1), 11-18.
Comi, S. L., Argentin, G., Gui, M., Origo, F., & Pagani, L. (2017). Is it the way they use it? Teachers, ICT and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 56, 24-39.
Czerniewicz, L., Ravjee, N., & Mlitwa, N. (2006). ICTs and the South African higher education landscape.
Das, K. (2019). The Role and Impact of ICT in Improving the Quality of Education: An Overview. International Journal of Innovative Studies in Sociology and Humanities, 4(6), 97-103.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Dawson, H. G. (2015). Clearing the clouds: Factors of technology adoption and their relationship to cloud computing adoption in United States higher education-An extended TAM study Capella University].
Hayashi, A., Chen, C., Ryan, T., & Wu, J. (2020). The role of social presence and moderating role of computer self efficacy in predicting the continuance usage of e-learning systems. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(2), 5.
Hennessy, S., Onguko, B., Harrison, D., Ang’ondi, E. K., Namalefe, S., Naseem, A., & Wamakote, L. (2010). Developing the use of information and communication technology to enhance teaching and learning in East African schools: Review of the literature. Centre for Commonwealth Education & Aga Khan University Institute for Educational Development–Eastern Africa Research Report, 1.
Huang, F., Teo, T., & Scherer, R. (2020). Investigating the antecedents of university students’ perceived ease of using the Internet for learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-17.
Huang, Y.-M., Huang, Y.-M., Huang, S.-H., & Lin, Y.-T. (2012). A ubiquitous English vocabulary learning system: Evidence of active/passive attitudes vs. usefulness/ease-of-use. Computers & Education, 58(1), 273-282.
Jung, M.-L. L., Loria, K., & Saha, R. M. P. (2008). E-Learning: Investigating University Student s Acceptance of Technology. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-learning, 11(2).
Khan, M. A., Nabi, M. K., Khojah, M., & Tahir, M. (2021). Students’ Perception towards E-Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic in India: An Empirical Study. Sustainability, 13(1), 57.
Kladi-Kokkinou, M. (2011). Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in education. Factors which contribute to a sustainable use of ICT in education. 6th ICODL 2011,
Latif, Z., Latif, S., Ximei, L., Pathan, Z. H., Salam, S., & Jianqiu, Z. (2018). The dynamics of ICT, foreign direct investment, globalization and economic growth: Panel estimation robust to heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence. Telematics and informatics, 35(2), 318-328.
MacGregor, K. (2008). South Africa: Universities not far behind the curve. University World News, 10.
Macharia, J., & Nyakwende, E. (2010). Influence of university factors on the students' acceptance of internet based learning tools in higher education.
Makoe, M., & Nsamba, A. (2019). The gap between student perceptions and expectations of quality support services at the University of South Africa. American Journal of Distance Education, 33(2), 132-141.
Makura, A. H. (2014). Students’ perceptions of the use of ICT in a higher education teaching and learning context: The case of a South African University. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(11), 43.
Mdlongwa, T. (2012). Information and communication technology (ICT) as a means of enhancing education in schools in South Africa. Policy Brief, Africa Institute of South Africa.
Mlitwa, N. B., & Nonyane, J. N. (2008). The status of ICT access and use in South African schools: comparing the rural and urban schools in the Mpumalanga Province. Retrieved January, 12, 2011.
Mlitwa, N. W., & Koranteng, K. (2013). Integration of ICT into curricula in Western Cape schools: The activity theory perspective. The Journal of Community Informatics, 9(4), 7-8.
Moreno, V., Cavazotte, F., & Alves, I. (2017). Explaining university students’ effective use of e?learning platforms. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(4), 995-1009.
Obinkyereh, W. T. (2017). Cloud computing adoption in Ghana: A quantitative study based on technology acceptance model (TAM) Colorado Technical University].
Pérez-Pérez, M., Serrano-Bedia, A. M., & García-Piqueres, G. (2020). An analysis of factors affecting students perceptions of learning outcomes with Moodle. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(8), 1114-1129.
Pituch, K. A., & Lee, Y.-k. (2006). The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education, 47(2), 222-244.
Saade, R., Nebebe, F., & Tan, W. (2007). Viability of the" technology acceptance model" in multimedia learning environments: a comparative study. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 3(1), 175-184.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods. Business Students 4th edition Pearson Education Limited, England.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research philosophy in the ‘research onion’. In: Pearson Education Limited.
Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., Roberts, G., & Francis, R. (2006). The undergraduate experience of blended e-learning: a review of UK literature and practice. The higher education academy, 1-103.
Shrestha, E., Mehta, R. S., Mandal, G., Chaudhary, K., & Pradhan, N. (2019). Perception of the learning environment among the students in a nursing college in Eastern Nepal. BMC medical education, 19(1), 1-7.
Tagoe, M. (2012). Students’ perceptions on incorporating e-learning into teaching and learning at the University of Ghana. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 8(1), 91-103.
Van de Bunt-Kokhuis, S., & Sultan, N. (2012). Servant-Leadership: The Online Way! E-Learning Where Community Building Is Key. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-learning.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Emile Mather, Martha Matashu, Jan Meyer

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

