Metacognition in Science Learning: Bibliometric Analysis of Last Two Decades

Authors

  • Mohd Dzul Hakim Wirzal Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS
  • Nur Syakinah Abdul Halim Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS
  • Nik Abdul Hadi Md Nordin Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS
  • Mohamad Azmi Bustam Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v6i1.665

Keywords:

metacognition, science learning, research trends, bibliometric analysis

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to map (1) the research of metacognition in science learning; (2) learning interventions used and metacognition’s key components that learned, integrated, and investigated; and (3) future research recommendations of metacognition research in science learning. We analyzed 438 scientific documents published in journals and books indexed in the Scopus database using VOSviewer software to visualize research trends and main keywords investigated of metacognition in science learning. The research findings show that research in the field of metacognition in science learning through the metacognition as attribution that integrated into learning interventions and as a learning outcome has increased in the last two decades. Scientific concepts understanding, critical thinking skills, motivation, and attention are the main goals in metacognition research. Inquiry-based learning, such as problem-based learning, is the most frequently used intervention to teach students metacognition. The research gaps found are (1) the cognitive regulations are the most investigated aspect, while cognitive aspects such as declarative knowledge, procedural knowledge, and conditional knowledge have not been widely investigated in science learning; (2) metacognition research on college students has a high frequency compared to school students; and (3) the integration of metacognition in online learning is still less investigated, this is indicated by the recommendations of several research results that encourage the integration of self-regulated learning into online learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aikina, T. Y., & Bolsunovskaya, L. M. (2020). Moodle-Based Learning: Motivating and Demotivating Factors. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(02), 239. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i02.11297

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (Complete ed). Longman.

Arends, R. (2012). Learning to teach (9th ed). McGraw-Hill.

Ash, D. (2000). The Process Skills of Inquiry. 2, 12.

Asy’ari, M., Ikhsan, M., & Muhali, M. (2019). The Effectiveness of Inquiry Learning Model in Improving Prospective Teachers’ Metacognition Knowledge and Metacognition Awareness. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12229a

Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Avargil, S., Lavi, R., & Dori, Y. J. (2018). Students’ Metacognition and Metacognitive Strategies in Science Education. In Y. J. Dori, Z. R. Mevarech, & D. R. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education (Vol. 24, pp. 33–64). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_3

Barrow, L. H. (2006). A Brief History of Inquiry: From Dewey to Standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9008-5

Beaufort. (2012). College writing and beyond: Five years later. Composition Forum, 26, 1–13.

Binali, T., Tsai, C.-C., & Chang, H.-Y. (2021). University students’ profiles of online learning and their relation to online metacognitive regulation and internet-specific epistemic justification. Computers & Education, 175, 104315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104315

Bi?rgi?li?, B. (2015). Creative and Critical Thinking Skills in Problem-based Learning Environments. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 2(2), 71–80.

Bol, L., & Garner, J. K. (2011). Challenges in supporting self-regulation in distance education environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2–3), 104–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9046-7

Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133

Bouroumi, A., & Fajr, R. (2014). Collaborative and Cooperative E-learning in Higher Education in Morocco: A Case Study. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 9(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v9i1.3065

Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In L. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 367–406). Halsted Press.

Burton, E. P. (2013). Student work products as a teaching tool for nature of science pedagogical knowledge: A professional development project with in-service secondary science teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.09.005

Cervin-Ellqvist, M., Larsson, D., Adawi, T., Stöhr, C., & Negretti, R. (2021). Metacognitive illusion or self-regulated learning? Assessing engineering students’ learning strategies against the backdrop of recent advances in cognitive science. Higher Education, 82(3), 477–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00635-x

Chen, C.-H., & Yang, Y.-C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review, 26, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001

Chen, H., & Ho, Y.-S. (2015). Highly cited articles in biomass research: A bibliometric analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 49, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.060

Crawford, B. A., & Capps, D. K. (2018). Teacher Cognition of Engaging Children in Scientific Practices. In Y. J. Dori, Z. R. Mevarech, & D. R. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education (Vol. 24, pp. 9–32). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_2

Crawford, B. A., Zembal-Saul, C., Munford, D., & Friedrichsen, P. (2005). Confronting prospective teachers’ ideas of evolution and scientific inquiry using technology and inquiry-based tasks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 613–637. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20070

Crippen, K. J., Wu, C. Y., Boyer, T., De Torres, T., Korolev, M., & Brucat, P. J. (2016). A pilot study of project-based learning in general chemistry for engineers: 123rd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2016-June. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983301348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

de Jong, T. (2019). Moving towards engaged learning in STEM domains; there is no simple answer, but clearly a road ahead. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(2), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12337

Dinsmore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008). Focusing the Conceptual Lens on Metacognition, Self-regulation, and Self-regulated Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9083-6

Dong, B., Xu, G., Luo, X., Cai, Y., & Gao, W. (2012). A bibliometric analysis of solar power research from 1991 to 2010. Scientometrics, 93(3), 1101–1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0730-9

Dori, Y. J., Avargil, S., Kohen, Z., & Saar, L. (2018). Context-based learning and metacognitive prompts for enhancing scientific text comprehension. International Journal of Science Education, 40(10), 1198–1220. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1470351

Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2015). Practice tests, spaced practice, and successive relearning: Tips for classroom use and for guiding students’ learning. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(1), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000024

Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining Its Facets and Levels of Functioning in Relation to Self-Regulation and Co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.277

Efklides, A., & Misailidi, P. (2010). Trends and prospects in metacognition research. In Trends and Prospects in Metacognition Res. (p. 479). Springer US; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6546-2

Efstratia, D. (2014). Experiential Education through Project Based Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 1256–1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.362

Eggen, P. D., & Kauchak, D. P. (2012). Strategies and models for teachers: Teaching content and thinking skills (6th ed). Pearson.

Egorov, E. E., Prokhorova, M. P., Lebedeva, T. E., Mineeva, O. A., & Tsvetkova, S. Y. (2021). Moodle LMS: Positive and Negative Aspects of Using Distance Education in Higher Education Institutions. Propósitos y Representaciones, 9(SPE2), e1104. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2021.v9nSPE2.1104

Fini, E. H., Awadallah, F., Parast, M. M., & Abu-Lebdeh, T. (2018). The impact of project-based learning on improving student learning outcomes of sustainability concepts in transportation engineering courses. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(3), 473–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1393045

Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Sodian, B., Hussmann, H., Pekrun, R., Neuhaus, B., Dorner, B., Pankofer, S., Fischer, M., Strijbos, J.-W., Heene, M., & Eberle, J. (2014). Scientific Reasoning and Argumentation: Advancing an Interdisciplinary Research Agenda in Education. Frontline Learning Research, 2(3), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i2.96

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

Fleur, D. S. (2021). Metacognition: Ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences. Npj Science of Learning, 11.

Garofalo, J., & Lester, F. K. (1985). Metacognition, Cognitive Monitoring, and Mathematical Performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 163. https://doi.org/10.2307/748391

Georghiades, P. (2004). From the general to the situated: Three decades of metacognition. International Journal of Science Education, 26(3), 365–383. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000119401

Goh, W. W., Hong, J. L., & Gunawan, W. (2014). Exploring Lecturers’ Perceptions of Learning Management System: An Empirical Study Based on TAM. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (IJEP), 4(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v4i3.3497

Grossman, P., Dean, C. G. P., Kavanagh, S. S., & Herrmann, Z. (2019). Preparing teachers for project-based teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 100(7), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721719841338

Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586

Hasni, A., Bousadra, F., Belletête, V., Benabdallah, A., Nicole, M.-C., & Dumais, N. (2016). Trends in research on project-based science and technology teaching and learning at K–12 levels: A systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 199–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1226573

Haug, B. S., & Mork, S. M. (2021). Taking 21st century skills from vision to classroom: What teachers highlight as supportive professional development in the light of new demands from educational reforms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 100, 103286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103286

Hernández-Ramos, J., Pernaa, J., Cáceres-Jensen, L., & Rodríguez-Becerra, J. (2021). The Effects of Using Socio-Scientific Issues and Technology in Problem-Based Learning: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 11(10), 640. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100640

Hoy, A. W. (2013). Educational psychology (12th ed). Pearson.

Jerome, C., Lee, J. A.-C., & Ting, S.-H. (2017). What Students Really Need: Instructional Strategies that Enhance Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) among UNIMAS Undergraduate. International Journal of Business and Society, 18(4), 661–668.

Kaberman, Z., & Dori, Y. J. (2009). Metacognition in chemical education: Question posing in the case-based computerized learning environment. Instructional Science, 37(5), 403–436. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9054-9

Kluwe, R. H. (1982). Cognitive Knowledge and Executive Control: Metacognition. In D. R. Griffin (Ed.), Animal Mind—Human Mind (pp. 201–224). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-68469-2_12

Kober, N. (2015). Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering (p. 18687). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18687

Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733

Kortam, N., Basheer, A., Hofstein, A., & Hugerat, M. (2018). How Project-Based Learning promotes 7th grade students’ motivation and attitudes towards studying biology. Action Research and Innovation in Science Education, 1(2), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.51724/arise.10

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

Kroll, D. L. (1988). Cooperative mathematical problem-solving and metacognition: A case study of three pairs of women [Doctoral Dissertation]. Indiana University.

Kulakli, A., & Osmanaj, V. (2020). Global Research on Big Data in Relation with Artificial Intelligence (A Bibliometric Study: 2008-2019). International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (IJOE), 16(02), 31. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v16i02.12617

Labroo, A. A., & Pocheptsova, A. (2016). Metacognition and consumer judgment: Fluency is pleasant but disfluency ignites interest. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.01.008

Lai, E. R. (2011). Critical thinking: A literature review (pp. 1–50). https://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/tmrs/CriticalThinkingReviewFINAL.pdf

Lavi, R., Tal, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2021). Perceptions of STEM alumni and students on developing 21st century skills through methods of teaching and learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101002

Li, Q. (2021). Analysis and practice on the training of key ability of students majoring in electronic information in higher vocational education. Procedia Computer Science, 183, 791–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.02.130

Liu, C., Bano, M., Zowghi, D., & Kearney, M. (2021). Analysing user reviews of inquiry-based learning apps in science education. Computers & Education, 164, 104119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104119

Loughran, J. J. (2002). Developing Reflective Practice (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203453995

Lynch, M. (2020). E-Learning During A Global Pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 189–195.

Masino, S., & Niño-Zarazúa, M. (2016). What works to improve the quality of student learning in developing countries? International Journal of Educational Development, 48, 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.11.012

McCormick, C. B. (2003). Metacognition and Learning. In I. B. Weiner (Ed.), Handbook of Psychology (p. wei0705). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0705

McDowell, L. D. (2019). The roles of motivation and metacognition in producing self-regulated learners of college physical science: A review of empirical studies. International Journal of Science Education, 41(17), 2524–2541. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1689584

Miller, E. C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2019). Promoting deep learning through project-based learning: A design problem. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0009-6

Morrison, J. A. (2013). Exploring Exemplary Elementary Teachers’ Conceptions and Implementation of Inquiry Science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 573–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9302-3

Muhali, M., Prahani, B. K., Mubarok, H., Kurnia, N., & Asy’ari, M. (2021). The Impact of Guided-Discovery-Learning Model on Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Critical Thinking Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 5(3), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v5i3.581

Muhali, M., Yuanita, L., & Ibrahim, M. (2019). The Validity and Effectiveness of the Reflective-Metacognitive Learning Model to Improve Students’ Metacognition Ability in Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 33–74. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2019.16.2.2

National Research Council (Ed.). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.

Negretti, R. (2021). Searching for Metacognitive Generalities: Areas of Convergence in Learning to Write for Publication Across Doctoral Students in Science and Engineering. Written Communication, 38(2), 167–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320984796

Noguera, I., Guerrero-Roldán, A.-E., & Masó, R. (2018). Collaborative agile learning in online environments: Strategies for improving team regulation and project management. Computers & Education, 116, 110–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.008

Ouyang, Y., Yang, G., Zhu, Y., Tan, Q., & Liu, X. (2020). Better regulatory performance without greater cognitive resource expenditure: The effect of motivational states on self-regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 166, 110170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110170

Ozdemir, A. S., Yildiz, F., & Yildiz, S. G. (2015). The effect of project based learning in “ratio, proportion and percentage” unit on mathematics success and attitude. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9417

Panadero, E., & Järvelä, S. (2015). Socially Shared Regulation of Learning: A Review. European Psychologist, 20(3), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000226

Papaleontiou-Louca, E. (2008). Metacognition and theory of mind. Cambridge Scholars Pub.

Peña-Ayala, A., & Cárdenas, L. (2015). A Conceptual Model of the Metacognitive Activity. In A. Peña-Ayala (Ed.), Metacognition: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends (Vol. 76, pp. 39–72). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11062-2_3

Perry, J., Lundie, D., & Golder, G. (2019). Metacognition in schools: What does the literature suggest about the effectiveness of teaching metacognition in schools? Educational Review, 71(4), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1441127

Peters, E., & Kitsantas, A. (2010). The Effect of Nature of Science Metacognitive Prompts on Science Students’ Content and Nature of Science Knowledge, Metacognition, and Self-Regulatory Efficacy: Science Metacognitive Prompts. School Science and Mathematics, 110(8), 382–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2010.00050.x

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 451–502). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3

Porter, A. N., & Peters-Burton, E. E. (2021). Investigating teacher development of self-regulated learning skills in secondary science students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 103403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103403

Prayoonsri, B., Tatsirin, S., Suntorapot, D., & Jariya, C. (2015). Factors affecting higher order thinking skills of students: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling study. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(19), 2639–2652. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2371

Ralph, R. A. (2016). Post secondary project-based learning in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 6(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.155

Rambocas, M., & Sastry, M. K. S. (2017). Teaching Business Management to Engineers: The Impact of Interactive Lectures. IEEE Transactions on Education, 60(3), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2016.2637327

Reis, A. C. B., Barbalho, S. C. M., & Zanette, A. C. D. (2017). A bibliometric and classification study of Project-based Learning in Engineering Education. Production, 27(spe). https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.225816

Sasson, I., Yehuda, I., & Malkinson, N. (2018). Fostering the skills of critical thinking and question-posing in a project-based learning environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.08.001

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1983). Beyond the Purely Cognitive: Belief Systems, Social Cognitions, and Metacognitions As Driving Forces in Intellectual Performance*. Cognitive Science, 7(4), 329–363. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0704_3

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics (Reprint). Journal of Education, 196(2), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600202

Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning. Research in Science Education, 36(1–2), 111–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033

Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212307

Schraw, G., Olafson, L., Weibel, M., & Sewing, D. (2012). Metacognitive Knowledge and Field-based Science Learning in an Outdoor Environmental Education Program. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in Science Education (Vol. 40, pp. 57–77). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2132-6_4

Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed). Pearson.

Sole, F. B., & Anggraeni, D. M. (2018). Inovasi Pembelajaran Elektronik dan Tantangan Guru Abad 21. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 2(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v2i1.79

Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Staley, R., & DuBois, N. (2004). Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning Constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(2), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1076/edre.10.2.117.27905

Sternberg, R. J. (1982). A componential approach to intellectual development. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 413–463). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Zhang, L. (2008). Styles of Learning and Thinking Matter in Instruction and Assessment. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(6), 486–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00095.x

Suhirman, Prayogi, S., & Asy’ari, M. (2021). Problem-Based Learning with CharacterEmphasis and Naturalist Intelligence: Examining Students Critical Thinking and Curiosity. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 217–232.

Taber, K. S. (2015). Affect and meeting the needs of the gifted chemistry learner: Providing intellectual challenge to engage students in enjoyable learning. In Affective Dimensions in Chemistry Education (pp. 133–158). Springer Berlin Heidelberg; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45085-7_7

Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76(3), 467–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3

Thomas, G. P. (2012). Metacognition in science education: Past, present and future considerations. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Science Education. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7

Tosun, C., & Senocak, E. (2013). The Effects of Problem-Based Learning on Metacognitive Awareness and Attitudes toward Chemistry of Prospective Teachers with Different Academic Backgrounds. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2013v38n3.2

Tsai, Y., Lin, C., Hong, J., & Tai, K. (2018). The effects of metacognition on online learning interest and continuance to learn with MOOCs. Computers & Education, 121, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.011

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2020). VOSviewer Manual. Universiteit Leiden. https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.15.pdf

Veenman, M. V. J. (2012). Metacognition in Science Education: Defi nitions, Constituents, and Their Intricate Relation with Cognition. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in Science Education (Vol. 40, pp. 21–36). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2132-6_2

Viegas, C., Marques, A., Alves, G. R., & Costa-Lobo, C. (2012). Engaging students by Moodleing a Course? Case studies at the Polytechnic of Porto â?? School of Engineering. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (IJEP), 2(3), 40. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v2i3.2154

Vrieling, E., Stijnen, S., & Bastiaens, T. (2018). Successful learning: Balancing self-regulation with instructional planning. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(6), 685–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1414784

Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Nachdr.). Harvard Univ. Press.

Yang, L., Sun, T., & Liu, Y. (2017). A Bibliometric Investigation of Flipped Classroom Research during 2000-2015. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 12(06), 178. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i06.7095

Yimer, A., & Ellerton, N. F. (2010). A five-phase model for mathematical problem solving: Identifying synergies in pre-service-teachers’ metacognitive and cognitive actions. ZDM, 42(2), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0223-3

Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-Regulation: Where Metacognition and Motivation Intersect. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 299–315). Routledge.

Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2013). A review of research on metacognition in science education: Current and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 49(2), 121–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.847261

Zohar, A., & David, A. B. (2008). Explicit teaching of meta-strategic knowledge in authentic classroom situations. Metacognition and Learning, 3(1), 59–82. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-007-9019-4

Downloads

Published

2022-03-25

How to Cite

Wirzal, M. D. H., Halim, N. S. A., Md Nordin, N. A. H., & Bustam, M. A. (2022). Metacognition in Science Learning: Bibliometric Analysis of Last Two Decades. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 6(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v6i1.665

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1: March 2022

Section

Article Review

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Mohd Dzul Hakim Wirzal, Nur Syakinah Abdul Halim, Nik Abdul Hadi Md Nordin, Mohamad Azmi Bustam

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika agree to the following terms:

  1. For all articles published in Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
  2. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC