Tingkat Kemampuan Berpikir Siswa dengan Pendekatan Metakognitif Diskursif dan Pendekatan Konvensional

Authors

  • Dorothea Novia L. Lubur STKIP Weetebula
  • Dekriati Ate STKIP Weetebula

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v2i1.81

Keywords:

Thinking Ability, Discursive Metacognitive, Conventional Approach

Abstract

[Title: The Level of Thinking Ability of Students with Metacognitive-Discursive Approaches and Conventional Approaches]. This paper discusses the different levels of thinking ability of students in the classroom using metacognitive-discursive and conventional approaches in SMPK St. Aloysius Weetebula. PISA is one of the tests that measure the level of critical thinking skills. The low PISA results of Indonesian students are caused by the weak ability to solve high-level problem problems, the evaluation system in Indonesia that still uses low-level questions, and students are accustomed to obtaining and using formal mathematical knowledge in class. One way to overcome this problem is STKIP Weetebula in collaboration with German misereor to improve the quality of education on the island of Sumba. To achieve this goal, an entrance test was conducted for all 7th-grade students of Aloysius Middle School in 2014 and 2017. In some exercises, there were very high score differences. From this exercise, one of the problems with the highest difference is a fraction. This research is an interpretative study through the analysis of student answers based on theory and descriptive analysis to measure differences in scores obtained by two groups of students. Research results in class with metacognitive-discursive approach 17 (89.47%) answered correctly and 2 (10.53%) of 19 students answered incorrectly, while in class with conventional approach 3 (2.59%) of 116 students answered correctly and 113 (97.41%) of 116 students answered incorrectly. Based on the results of this study concluded that students in the classroom with a metacognitive-discursive approach to learning more than students in other.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Basuki, R. (2000). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika dan tidal lanjut. (Bandung : Tesis tidak diterbitkan, UPI).

http:///www.Genlibrus.ac.id/2003/11/Pecahan.pdf. Diakses Tanggal 4 September 2017.

http://gnmnurmaulida.wordpress.com/2013/11/05/KonsepPecahan. 8 September 2017.

http://pengumuman.PISA.blogspot.co.id/2013/10/ Diakses Tanggal 4 September 2017.

Johar, R. (2006). Pengembangan level penalaran proporsional siswa SMP. Disertasi Doktor. Tidak Diterbitkan. Universitas Negeri Surabaya: Surabaya

Kaune, C. (2011). Developmentof Metacognitive and Diskursive Activities in Indonesian Maths Teaching. Palembang: Pasca Sarjana UNSRI.

Kaune, C. (2011). Developmentof Metacognitive and Diskursive Activities in Indonesian Maths Teaching. Palembang: Pasca Sarjana UNSRI.

Kaune, C. Cohors-Fresenborg, dan Nowinska, E. (2011) Development of Metacognitive and Discursive Activities in Indonesian Maths Teaching. Palembang:Pasca Sarjana UNSRI.

Kaune, C. Cohors-Fresenborg, dan Nowinska, E. (2011) Kontrak Untuk Perhitungan. Weetebula:Lembaga Matematika Kognitif STKIP Weetebula.

Kennedy (1994). PengertianPecahan. http://www.Genlibrus.ac.id. 8 September 2017.

Novita.(2012). SistemEvaluasi.

Schneider (2010). http://Metakognitif-Diskursif. Schneider dkk., (2010). 8 September 2017

Sukirman. (1985). Identifikasi kesalahan-kesalahan yang dibuat siswa kelas III SMP pada setiap aspek penguasaan bahan pelajaran Matematika. (Malang: Tesis tidak dipublikasikan)

Downloads

Published

2018-12-31

How to Cite

Lubur, D. N. L., & Ate, D. (2018). Tingkat Kemampuan Berpikir Siswa dengan Pendekatan Metakognitif Diskursif dan Pendekatan Konvensional. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 2(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v2i1.81

Issue

Section

Research Papers