The Effect of Scientific Approach on Junior High School Students’ Scientific Creativity and Cognitive Learning Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v6i3.955Keywords:
Scientific Approach, Scientific Creativity, Cognitive Learning OutcomesAbstract
This study investigates the effects of using scientific approach-based learning tools on students' scientific creativity (SC) and cognitive learning outcomes (CLO). This study employed a one-group pretest-posttest design that involved 70 students of Maduran Junior High School Lamongan. Students' SC and CLO were collected by using fifteen essay tests and analyzed descriptively and statistically. The result shows that (1) the proportion of lesson plan (RPP) implementation was highly excellent, (2) students’ responses were quite strong to the learning activities, and (3) students' SC and CLO improved moderately. Statistically, students’ SC and CLO stated significantly different after treatment (p < 0.05) and positively correlate (Sig. > 0.7). Based on the study findings and discussion, it can be concluded that the scientific approach significantly affects students’ SC and CLO.
Downloads
References
Al-Ghussain, L. (2019). Global warming: Review on driving forces and mitigation. Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy, 38(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13041
Ambarawati, M. (2016). Analisis Keterampilan Mengajar Calon Guru Pendidikan Matematika Pada MataKuliah Micro Teaching. PEDAGOGIA: Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v5i1.91
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (Complete ed). Longman.
Bay, U., Maghidman, M., Waugh, J., & Shlonsky, A. (2021). Guidelines for Using Simulation for Online Teaching and Learning of Clinical Social Work Practice in the Time of COVID. Clinical Social Work Journal, 49(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-021-00807-x
Biazus, M. de O., & Mahtari, S. (2022). The Impact of Project-Based Learning (PjBL) Model on Secondary Students’ Creative Thinking Skills. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v1i1.752
Bozkurt Altan, E., & Tan, S. (2020). Concepts of creativity in design based learning in STEM education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09569-y
Chankseliani, M., Qoraboyev, I., & Gimranova, D. (2021). Higher education contributing to local, national, and global development: New empirical and conceptual insights. Higher Education, 81(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00565-8
Chotijah Fanaqi. (2021). Tiktok Sebagai Media Kreativitas Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Dakwah, 22(1), 105–130.
Dao, T. H., Docquier, F., Maurel, M., & Schaus, P. (2021). Global migration in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries: The unstoppable force of demography. In Review of World Economics (Vol. 157, Issue 2). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-020-00402-1
D?u-Ga?par, O. (2013). Verbal and Figural Creativity in Contemporary High-school Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 662–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.371
Djidu, H., Mashuri, S., Nasruddin, N., Sejati, A. E., Rasmuin, R., Ugi, L. E., & Arua, A. La. (2021). Online learning in the post-Covid-19 pandemic era: Is our higher education ready for it? Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 5(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v5i2.479
Dökme, ?., & Koyunlu Ünlü, Z. (2021). The Challenge of Quantum Physics Problems with Self-Metacognitive Questioning. Research in Science Education, 51, 783–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9821-4
Elmer, T., Mepham, K., & Stadtfeld, C. (2020). Students under lockdown: Comparisons of students’ social networks and mental health before and during the COVID-19 crisis in Switzerland. PLoS ONE, 15(7 July), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236337
Faresta, R. A., Anggara, W., Mandiri, T. A., & Septiawan, A. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Berbasis Pendekatan Konflik Kognitif. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Geologi, Dan Geofisika (GeoScienceEd Journal), 1(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/goescienceedu.v1i2.55
Genek, S. E., & Küçük, Z. D. (2020). Investigation of scientific creativity levels of elementary school students who enrolled in a stem program1-2. Elementary Education Online, 19(3), 1715–1728. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.734849
Gupta, P., & Sharma, Y. (2019). Nurturing Scientific Creativity in Science Classroom. Resonance, 24(5), 561–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12045-019-0810-8
Hadzigeorgiou, Y., Fokialis, P., & Kabouropoulou, M. (2012). Thinking about Creativity in Science Education. Creative Education, 03(05), 603–611. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.35089
Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores*. 4.
Hamel, E., Joo, Y., Hong, S. Y., & Burton, A. (2021). Teacher Questioning Practices in Early Childhood Science Activities. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49(3), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01075-z
Handayani, R. D., & Putra, P. DA. (2019). Student Cognition in the Context of a Climate System: Global Warming and Greenhouse Effect. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 3(2), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v3i2.3739
Harris, A., & de Bruin, L. R. (2018). Secondary school creativity, teacher practice and STEAM education: An international study. Journal of Educational Change, 19(2), 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-017-9311-2
Henry, J., Hernalesteen, A., & Collard, A. S. (2021). Teaching Artificial Intelligence to K-12 Through a Role-Playing Game Questioning the Intelligence Concept. KI - Kunstliche Intelligenz, 35(2), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-021-00733-7
Kim, Min-Ju? Lim, C.-S. (2018). A Comparative Analysis of Student Self-, Teacher-, and Objective Assessments of Elementary Science-Gifted Students’ Scientific Creativity. 454, 440–454.
Lu, C. C. (2017). Interactive effects of environmental experience and innovative cognitive style on student creativity in product design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(4), 577–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9368-x
Moura, G. G., Nascimento, C. R. R., & Ferreira, J. M. (2020). COVID-19: Reflections on the Crisis, Transformation, and Interactive Processes Under Development. Trends in Psychology, 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-020-00061-z
Nurhidayati, E. (2017). Pedagogi Konstruktivisme dalam Praksis Pendidikan Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Educational Counseling, 1(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30653/001.201711.2
Ozkan, G., & Umdu Topsakal, U. (2021). Exploring the effectiveness of STEAM design processes on middle school students’ creativity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(1), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09547-z
Pisl, V., Volavka, J., Chvojkova, E., Cechova, K., Kavalirova, G., & Vevera, J. (2021). Dissociation, cognitive reflection and health literacy have a modest effect on belief in conspiracy theories about covid-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105065
Ratumanan, T. G., & Laurens, T. (2011). Penilaian Hasil Belajar pada Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Unesa University Press.
Riduwan. (2008). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian. Alfabeta. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=350661
Roth, T., Conradty, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2021). Testing Creativity and Personality to Explore Creative Potentials in the Science Classroom. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10005-x
Said-Metwaly, S., Van den Noortgate, W., & Barbot, B. (2021). Torrance test of creative thinking-verbal, Arabic version: Measurement invariance and latent mean differences across gender, year of study, and academic major. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39(September 2020), 100768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100768
Samsudin, A., Setyadin, A. H., Suhendi, E., Chandra, D. T., & Siahaan, P. (2018). Seventh Grade Students’ Scientific Creativity Test: A Preliminary-Study on Earth Science Context. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 288(1), 2–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/288/1/012012
Sánchez, A., Font, V., & Breda, A. (2021). Significance of creativity and its development in mathematics classes for preservice teachers who are not trained to develop students’ creativity. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00367-w
Sapuadi, S., & Nasir, M. (2020). Penanggulangan Miskonsepsi Menggunakan Pendekatan Konflik Kognitif. Al-Mudarris (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Islam), 3(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.23971/mdr.v3i1.2036
Sari, S., Aryana, D. M., Subarkah, C. Z., & Ramdhani, M. A. (2018). Multimedia Based on Scientific Approach for Periodic System of Element. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 288(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/288/1/012137
Sayuti, R. H., Inderasari, O. P., & Evendi, A. (2021). The Influence of Education and Local Culture on Community Preparedness in Facing Disasters. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v5i1.381
Seprianto, S., & Hasibuan, M. P. (2021). Effectiveness of Blood Learning Based on the Ethnochemical Approach Module on Improving Science Literation Abilities. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), 1117–1122. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i1.1720
Septaria, K. (2019). Mengeksplorasi Argumentasi dan Pengetahuan Pendidik Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA) Tentang Pemanasan Global [Exploring the Arguments and Knowledge of Natural Sciences (IPA) Educators on Global Warming]. PEDAGOGIA: Jurnal Pendidikan, 8(2), 247. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v8i2.2369
Septaria, K., & Dewanti, B. A. (2021). Implementation of Project Based Learning on Student Reasoning on Covid-19 Disaster Mitigation. 9(1), 20–27.
Septaria, K., Dewanti, B. A., & Afidah, M. I. El. (2020). Development Of Module Disaster Mitigation Based On Stem For Secondary Schools. Jurnal Peneliltian Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 61–68.
Sopacua, J., Fadli, M. R., & Rochmat, S. (2020). The history learning module integrated character values. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 14(3), 463–472. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v14i3.16139
Suarman, S., Hendripides, H., & Hikmah, N. (2018). Development of Innovative Teaching Materials through Scientific Approach. Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.2.2.p.14-22
Sukaisih, R., Muhali, M., & Asy’ari, M. (2020). Meningkatkan keterampilan metakognisi dan berpikir kritis siswa melalui pembelajaran model pemecahan masalah dengan strategi konflik-kognitif. Empiricism Journal, 1(1), 37–50.
Sulisworo, D., Drusmin, R., Kusumaningtyas, D. A., Handayani, T., Wahyuningsih, W., Jufriansah, A., Khusnani, A., & Prasetyo, E. (2021). The Science Teachers’ Optimism Response to the Use of Marker-Based Augmented Reality in the Global Warming Issue. Education Research International, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7264230
Sutrio, S., Makhrus, Muh., & Larasati, A. (2020). Pengaruh Pendekatan Konflik Kognitif Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Pada Materi Gerak Lurus. Kappa Journal, 4(2), 136–142. https://doi.org/10.29408/kpj.v4i2.2605
Tambunan, H. (2019). The Effectiveness of the Problem Solving Strategy and the Scientific Approach to Students’ Mathematical Capabilities in High Order Thinking Skills. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5715
Thuneberg, H. M., Salmi, H. S., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). How creativity, autonomy and visual reasoning contribute to cognitive learning in a STEAM hands-on inquiry-based math module. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29(April), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.003
Torrance, E. P. (1995). Insights about creativity: Questioned, rejected, ridiculed, ignored. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213376
Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should Teachers be Trained in Emergency Remote Teaching? Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Jl. of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189–199.
Utami, A., Rochintaniawati, D., & Suwarma, I. R. (2020). Enhancement of STEM literacy on knowledge aspect after implementing science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM)-based instructional module. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042048
Woods, S., & Hsu, Y. C. (2020). Making Spaces for STEM in the School Library. TechTrends, 64(3), 388–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00460-9
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Kiki Septaria, Reny Rismayanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
