Human Computer Interaction dalam Sistem Pendataan Pasien: Berdasarkan Perspektif Ontologi, Epistemologi, dan Aksiologi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/rj.v5i2.3794Keywords:
HCI, sistem informasi kesehatan, pendataan pasien, filsafat ilmu, ontologi,, epistemologi, aksiologiAbstract
Human Computer Interaction (HCI) adalah bidang multi disiplin ilmu yang berfokus pada interaksi antara manusia dan sistem komputer, khususnya dalam sistem informasi kesehatan seperti sistem pendataan pasien. Artikel ini mengkaji HCI dalam konteks sistem pendataan pasien melalui pendekatan filsafat ilmu, yang meliputi 3 pendekatan yakni ontologi, epistemologi, dan aksiologi. Metode yang digunakan yaitu studi pustaka dengan menelaah literatur jurnal nasional dan internasional terkait HCI, sistem informasi kesehatan, dan filsafat ilmu. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa secara ontologi, sistem pendataan pasien terdiri dari entitas pengguna, perangkat keras, perangkat lunak, antarmuka, serta data medis. Secara epistemologi, pengetahuan diperoleh melalui usability testing dan validasi data. Secara aksiologi, HCI memberikan manfaat berupa peningkatan efisiensi layanan, akurasi data, dan perlindungan privasi pasien. Dengan pendekatan filsafat ini, HCI dalam sistem pendataan pasien dipahami sebagai suatu sistem yang tidak hanya teknis, tetapi juga bermakna dan etis.
Human-Computer Interaction in Patient Data Management Systems: An Ontological, Epistemological, and Axiological Perspective
Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is a multidisciplinary field focused on the interaction between humans and computer systems, especially in health information systems such as patient data management systems. This paper examines HCI within the context of patient data management systems through a philosophical framework that includes ontology, epistemology, and axiology. The methodology employed is a literature review, analyzing relevant national and international journals related to HCI, health information systems, and the philosophy of science. The findings indicate that, from an ontological perspective, a patient data management system consists of entities such as users, hardware, software, interfaces, and medical data. From an epistemological viewpoint, knowledge is acquired through usability testing and data validation. From an axiological standpoint, HCI brings benefits in terms of enhanced service efficiency, data accuracy, and patient privacy protection. With this philosophical approach, HCI in patient data management systems is understood not only as a technical phenomenon but also as a meaningful, valuable, and ethical system.
References
Ajami, H., & Bagheri, M. (2018). Ontology-based model to support ubiquitous healthcare services. Journal of Medical Systems, 42(9), 175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-1024-3
Al Khatib, H. S., Haddad, J. E., & Beheshti, A. (2024). Patient-centric knowledge graphs: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07435. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.07435
Alzghaibi, H. (2023). Usability of health information technology for medical and health sciences students. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 16, 1305-1314. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S408920
Bloom, B. M., Curnow, E., & Taylor, A. (2021). Usability of electronic health record systems in UK emergency departments. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01471-0
Bologva, E. V. (2016). Human–Computer Interaction in electronic medical records. International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector, 8(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJISSS.2016040101
Cahill, M., Kearney, J., & Doran, J. (2024). The influence of electronic health record design on usability and medication safety: A systematic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 24(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02341-2
Callahan, T. J., Stefanski, A. L., Wyrwa, J. M., Zeng, C., Ostropolets, A., Banda, J. M., Baumgartner, W. A., Boyce, R. D., Casiraghi, E., Coleman, B. D., Collins, J. H., Deakyne-Davies, S. J., Feinstein, J. A., Lin, A. Y., Martin, B., Matentzoglu, N. A., Meeker, D., Reese, J., Sinclair, J., Taneja, S. B., Trinkley, K. E., Vasilevsky, N. A., Williams, A. E., Zhang, X. A., Denny, J. C., Ryan, P. B., Hripcsak, G., Bennett, T. D., Haendel, M. A., Robinson, P. N., Hunter, L. E., & Kahn, M. G. (2023). Ontologizing health systems data at scale: Making translational discovery a reality. npj Digital Medicine, 6(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00830-x
Croon, A. (2022). Thinking with care in human–computer interaction: Designing for ethics. Interacting with Computers, 34(2), 98-112. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwac002
Farzandipour, M., Meidani, Z., & Sadoughi, F. (2022). Comparison of usability evaluation methods for health information systems: A systematic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 22(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01856-9
Fitria, N., Naufal, F., & Mulyani, S. (2023). Usability testing of the integrated electronic-healthcare system (IeHS). Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Komputer, 11(3), 176-182. https://doi.org/10.14710/jtsiskom.2023.176
Frid, S., Karlsson, D., & Danielsson, M. (2023). An ontology-based approach for consolidating patient data standardized with EN/ISO 13606 into OMOP repositories. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 136, 104216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104216
Galavi, Z., Sadeghi, P., & Rahmani, M. (2024). Usability and evaluation of a health information system in a clinical setting. Journal of Medical Systems, 48(3), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-024-01789-0
Hochheiser, H., & Beaudin, J. S. (2020). Human–Computer Interaction, ethics, and biomedical informatics. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 29(1), 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701971
Holmgren, A. J., Apathy, N. C., Adler-Milstein, J., & Friedberg, M. W. (2024). Electronic health record usability, satisfaction, and burnout: Cross-sectional analysis. JAMA Network Open, 7(4), e248761. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8761
Jeddi, F. R., Hashemi, N., & Nikkhah, M. (2020). Usability challenges in the national health information system. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 135, 104082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104082
Jing, X., Wang, F., Zhao, Y., & Yang, J. (2022). A systematic review of ontology-based clinical decision support systems. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5, 937524. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.937524
Kaipio, J., Lääveri, T., Hyppönen, H., Vainiomäki, S., Reponen, J., Kushniruk, A., Borycki, E., & Vänskä, J. (2020). Physicians’ and nurses’ experiences on EHR usability: Lessons from Finland. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 134, 104018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104018
Kiran, G. M., & Reddy, C. M. (2022). An ontology-based data access control model for secure healthcare information sharing. Healthcare Analytics, 3, 100046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.health.2022.100046
Langote, N., Thakare, P., & Deshmukh, R. (2024). Ontology in HCI: An analysis of patient data systems. International Journal of Computer Science, 23(8), 201-213. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijcset20242308
Li, X., Zhang, Q., & Wang, Y. (2022). The role of HCI in healthcare systems: A review of design, ethics, and usability. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 142, 105191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105191
Lin, A. Y., Dreyer, M., & Callahan, T. J. (2023). Improving the quality and utility of electronic health records: An HCI perspective. Information, 14(3), 190. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14030190
Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things (1st ed.). MIT Press.
Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 249-256). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/97243.97281
Pruitt, Z., Andrews, M., & Lyles, C. R. (2022). Development and pilot evaluation of a usability and safety assessment tool for EHR systems. Applied Clinical Informatics, 13(2), 421-431. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1746181
Rahayu, E. (2013). Human–Computer Interaction in healthcare systems. Journal of Healthcare Informatics, 5(2), 45-52.
Ratwani, R. M., Savage, E., Will, A., Fong, A., Karavite, D., Muthu, N., Rivera, A. J., Franklin, A., & Rising, J. (2018). Identifying electronic health record usability and safety challenges in pediatric settings. Health Affairs, 37(11), 1752-1759. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0699
Rizvi, R. F., Marquard, J. L., Hultman, G., & Adam, T. J. (2017). Usability evaluation of an electronic health record system in a teaching hospital. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 104, 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.05.014
Sawant, S., Kulkarni, S., & Bhatia, S. (2023). Usability testing of healthcare devices: A systematic review. Healthcare Technology Letters, 10(5), 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1049/htl2.12345
Vatnøy, T. K., Fossum, M., & Smith, A. C. (2014). A usability evaluation of an electronic health record for nursing documentation. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 205, 878-882. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-432-9-878
Windle, J. R., & Windle, T. A. (2021). Roadmap to a more useful and usable electronic health record. Applied Clinical Informatics, 12(4), 880-893. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736260
Wronikowska, M. W., Opolska, N., & Stemplewski, R. (2021). Systematic review of applied usability metrics in healthcare information systems. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1), 512. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06535-3
Zhang, Y., Yang, L., & Wang, J. (2017). An ontology-based approach to patient follow-up for chronic disease management. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 68, 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2017.02.003
Zhao, X., Wang, L., & Li, C. (2024). Human–Computer Interaction in healthcare: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 182, 103781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103781
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jamilah Karaman, Syaad Patmanthara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
