Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Scientific Literacy between 2018 and 2022: Science Education Subject

Authors

  • Mohd Dzul Hakim Wirzal Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS
  • Nik Abdul Hadi Md Nordin Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS
  • Mohamad Azmi Bustam Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS
  • Maria Joselevich Universidad Nacional Arturo Jauretche https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1717-2450

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v1i2.1070

Keywords:

bibliometric analysis, scientific literacy, science education

Abstract

This study presents the results of a bibliometric scientific literacy analysis on science education subjects. The main objectives of this study are (1) to analyze trends in scientific publications on scientific literacy in science education subjects; (2) identification of networks between authors, institutions, and countries; and (3) to understand the structure and focus of research and teaching themes of scientific literacy on science education subject. This research uses 451 published documents from 2018-2022 from the SCOPUS database. VosViewer software is used to analyze and visualize research data. The results of the research show (1) scientific publications on the topic of scientific literacy in science education subject have increased significantly in the last five years; (2) research results on this topic are published in reputable scientific journals (ranked Q1 and Q2); (3) United States is the country with the highest number of documents, citations, and institutions; and (4) there are six groups of keywords used, namely scientific literacy, science education, nature of science, students, education, and teacher education. This study recommends that research at the primary and secondary education levels by taking into account aspects of SL traits can be carried out in future research.

Author Biography

References

Aristeidou, M., & Herodotou, C. (2020). Online Citizen Science: A Systematic Review of Effects on Learning and Scientific Literacy. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.224

Boh Podgornik, B., Dolni?ar, D., & Glažar, S. A. (2017). Does the Information Literacy of University Students Depend on their Scientific Literacy? EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00762a

Chi, S., Liu, X., Wang, Z., & Won Han, S. (2018). Moderation of the effects of scientific inquiry activities on low SES students’ PISA 2015 science achievement by school teacher support and disciplinary climate in science classroom across gender. International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1284–1304. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1476742

Djeki, E., Dégila, J., Bondiombouy, C., & Alhassan, M. H. (2022). E-learning bibliometric analysis from 2015 to 2020. Journal of Computers in Education, 9(4), 727–754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00218-4

Foster, J. S., & Shiel-Rolle, N. (2011). Building Scientific Literacy through Summer Science Camps: A Strategy for Design, Implementation and Assessment. Science Education International, 22(2), 85–98.

Glaze, A. (2018). Teaching and Learning Science in the 21st Century: Challenging Critical Assumptions in Post-Secondary Science. Education Sciences, 8(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010012

Goksu, I. (2021). Bibliometric mapping of mobile learning. Telematics and Informatics, 56, 101491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101491

Haug, B. S., & Mork, S. M. (2021). Taking 21st century skills from vision to classroom: What teachers highlight as supportive professional development in the light of new demands from educational reforms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 100, 103286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103286

Herman, B. C. (2018). Students’ environmental NOS views, compassion, intent, and action: Impact of place-based socioscientific issues instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(4), 600–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21433

Hernández-Torrano, D., & Ho, Y.-S. (2021). A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications in the Web of Science Category of Educational Psychology in the Last Two Decades. Psicología Educativa, 27(2), Article 2.

Hsu, F.-H., Lin, I.-H., Yeh, H.-C., & Chen, N.-S. (2022). Effect of Socratic Reflection Prompts via video-based learning system on elementary school students’ critical thinking skills. Computers & Education, 183, 104497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104497

Kuthe, A., Körfgen, A., Stötter, J., & Keller, L. (2020). Strengthening their climate change literacy: A case study addressing the weaknesses in young people’s climate change awareness. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 19(4), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2019.1597661

Le Thi Thu, H., Tran, T., Trinh Thi Phuong, T., Le Thi Tuyet, T., Le Huy, H., & Vu Thi, T. (2021). Two Decades of STEM Education Research in Middle School: A Bibliometrics Analysis in Scopus Database (2000–2020). Education Sciences, 11(7), 353. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070353

Mack, C. A. (2018). How to write a good scientific paper. SPIE Press.

National Research Council (Ed.). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.

Ni’mah, F. (2019). Research trends of scientific literacy in Indonesia: Where are we? Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i1.20862

Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M., & Burns, D. P. (2014). Conceptions of Scientific Literacy: Identifying and Evaluating Their Programmatic Elements. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching (pp. 1317–1344). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_40

Olson, J. K., Tippett, C. D., Milford, T. M., Ohana, C., & Clough, M. P. (2015). Science Teacher Preparation in a North American Context. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9417-9

O’Toole, J. M., McKoy, K., Freestone, M., & Osborn, J.-A. (2020). ‘Scientific Literacy’: An Exercise in Model Building. Education Sciences, 10(8), 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10080204

Pham, H.-H., Dong, T.-K.-T., Vuong, Q.-H., Luong, D.-H., Nguyen, T.-T., Dinh, V.-H., & Ho, M.-T. (2021). A bibliometric review of research on international student mobilities in Asia with Scopus dataset between 1984 and 2019. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5201–5224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03965-4

Prahani, B. K., Jatmiko, B., Amelia, T., Pristianti, M. C., Suliyanah, S., & Mahtari, S. (2022). Online and Distance Learning Research in The Last 30 Years: Real Contribution in Physics Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 6(3), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v6i3.897

?entürk, C., & Sari, H. (2018). Investigation of the Contribution of Differentiated Instruction into Science Literacy. Qualitative Research in Education, 7(2), 197. https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.2018.3383

Shaffer, J. F., Ferguson, J., & Denaro, K. (2019). Use of the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills Reveals That Fundamental Literacy Is an Important Contributor to Scientific Literacy. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(3), ar31. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-12-0238

Spector, J. M., & Ma, S. (2019). Inquiry and critical thinking skills for the next generation: From artificial intelligence back to human intelligence. Smart Learning Environments, 6(1), 8, s40561-019-0088-z. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0088-z

Spires, H. A., Kerkhoff, S. N., Graham, A. C. K., Thompson, I., & Lee, J. K. (2018). Operationalizing and validating disciplinary literacy in secondary education. Reading and Writing, 31(6), 1401–1434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9839-4

Suhaimi, N., & Mahmud, S. N. D. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis of Climate Change Literacy between 2001 and 2021. Sustainability, 14(19), 11940. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911940

Wirzal, M. D. H., Halim, N. S. A., Nordin, N. A. H. M., & Bustam, M. A. (2022). Metacognition in Science Learning: Bibliometric Analysis of Last Two Decades. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 6(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v6i1.665

Zeidler, D. L. (2016). STEM education: A deficit framework for the twenty first century? A sociocultural socioscientific response. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9578-z

Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., Clough, M. P., Olson, J. K., Kahn, S., & Newton, M. (2016). Humanitas Emptor: Reconsidering Recent Trends and Policy in Science Teacher Education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(5), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9481-4

Zupic, I., & ?ater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

Issue

Section

Article Review

How to Cite

Wirzal, M. D. H., Nordin, N. A. H. M., Bustam, M. A., & Joselevich, M. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Scientific Literacy between 2018 and 2022: Science Education Subject. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 1(2), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v1i2.1070

Similar Articles

21-30 of 32

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.