The Experimental Experience of Motion Kinematics in Biology Class Using PhET Virtual Simulation and Its Impact on Learning Outcomes


  • Ni Nyoman Sri Putu Verawati University of Mataram
  • Lia Saptini Handriani Hanyang University
  • Binar Kurnia Prahani State University of Surabaya



Physics experiment, PhET virtual simulation, Student learning outcomes


This study aimed to provide biology students with a motion kinematics experimental experience using virtual PhET simulations and explore the improvement of their physics learning outcomes. Pre-experimental (pretest-posttest experimental design) was conducted in this study, pretest-posttest was carried out before and after the learning treatment, while the learning treatment was motion kinematics experiment using virtual PhET simulation. The research sample was taken purposively, they were 24 students of the Biology Education Study Program, FKIP Mataram University who took Basic Physics courses. Student learning outcomes were measured using a test instrument. Learning outcomes data were analyzed descriptively with the average score of achievement or performance of students' cognitive learning outcomes on pretest and posttest, as well as n-gain analysis. In addition, statistical analysis (Wilcoxon test) was used to determine the difference in the average score of student learning outcomes between pre-posttest (p < 0.05). The results of the descriptive analysis showed that the average score of student learning outcomes increased from pretest to posttest with successive criteria from "less" to "good," an increase in student learning outcomes with high criteria with an n-gain score of 0.71. The results of the statistical test showed that there was a significant difference in the average score of student learning outcomes before and after the motion kinematics experiment using PhET virtual simulation. The results in this study provide a learning experience related to ways of conducting physics concepts that are more meaningful in the learning process that can be widely used in routine physics teaching in the classroom.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ni Nyoman Sri Putu Verawati, University of Mataram

Scopus ID: 57193126887


Bloom, B. H. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. David Mackay Co.

Cabedo, L., Royo, M., Moliner, L., & Guraya, T. (2018). University Social Responsibility towards Engineering Undergraduates: The Effect of Methodology on a Service-Learning Experience. Sustainability, 10(6), 1823.

Chen, S. (2010). The view of scientific inquiry conveyed by simulation-based virtual laboratories. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1123–1130.

Chen, S., Chang, W.-H., Lai, C.-H., & Tsai, C.-Y. (2014). A Comparison of Students’ Approaches to Inquiry, Conceptual Learning, and Attitudes in Simulation-Based and Microcomputer-Based Laboratories. Science Education, 98(5), 905–935.

Chinaka, T. W. (2021). The Effect of PhET Simulation vs. Phenomenon-based Experiential Learning on Students’ Integration of Motion Along Two Independent Axes in Projectile Motion. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 25(2), 185–196.

Correia, A.-P., Koehler, N., Thompson, A., & Phye, G. (2019). The application of PhET simulation to teach gas behavior on the submicroscopic level: Secondary school students’ perceptions. Research in Science & Technological Education, 37(2), 193–217.

de Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education. Science, 340(6130), 305–308.

de la Torre, L., Guinaldo, M., Heradio, R., & Dormido, S. (2015). The Ball and Beam System: A Case Study of Virtual and Remote Lab Enhancement With Moodle. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 11(4), 934–945.

Diwakar, S., Kumar, D., Radhamani, R., Nizar, N., Nair, B., Sasidharakurup, H., & Achuthan, K. (2015). Role of ICT-enabled virtual laboratories in biotechnology education: Case studies on blended and remote learning. 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), 915–921.

El Kharki, K., Berrada, K., & Burgos, D. (2021). Design and Implementation of a Virtual Laboratory for Physics Subjects in Moroccan Universities. Sustainability, 13(7), 3711.

Feisel, L. D., & Rosa, A. J. (2005). The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 121–130.

Guimarães, E. G., Cardozo, E., Moraes, D. H., & Coelho, P. R. (2011). Design and Implementation Issues for Modern Remote Laboratories. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 4(2), 149–161.

Hake, R., R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. Indiana University: Woodland Hills, CA - USA.

Hassan, H., Martinez-Rubio, J.-M., Perles, A., Capella, J.-V., Dominguez, C., & Albaladejo, J. (2013). Smartphone-Based Industrial Informatics Projects and Laboratories. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 9(1), 557–566.

Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7–19.

Lin, X., Yang, W., Wu, L., Zhu, L., Wu, D., & Li, H. (2021). Using an Inquiry-Based Science and Engineering Program to Promote Science Knowledge, Problem-Solving Skills and Approaches to Learning in Preschool Children. Early Education and Development, 32(5), 695–713.

Ndihokubwayo, K., Uwamahoro, J., & Ndayambaje, I. (2020). Effectiveness of PhET Simulations and YouTube Videos to Improve the Learning of Optics in Rwandan Secondary Schools. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 24(2), 253–265.

Restivo, M. T., & Cardoso, A. (2013). Exploring Online Experimentation. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (IJOE), 9(S8), 4.

Scanlon, E., Morris, E., di Paolo, T., & Cooper, M. (2002). Contemporary approaches to learning science: Technologically-mediated practical work. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 73–114.

Stahre Wästberg, B., Eriksson, T., Karlsson, G., Sunnerstam, M., Axelsson, M., & Billger, M. (2019). Design considerations for virtual laboratories: A comparative study of two virtual laboratories for learning about gas solubility and colour appearance. Education and Information Technologies, 24(3), 2059–2080.

Thomas, I. (2014). Special Issue—Pedagogy for Education for Sustainability in Higher Education. Sustainability, 6(4), 1705–1708.

Toto, T., & Yulisma, L. (2017). Analisis Aplikasi Konsep Gaya dalam Fisika yang Berkaitan dengan Bidang Biologi. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(1), 63.

Ünal, F., & Kayg?n, H. (2020). Citizenship Education for Adults for Sustainable Democratic Societies. Sustainability, 12(1), 56.

Yuen, A. H. K. (2006). Learning to program through interactive simulation. Educational Media International, 43(3), 251–268.

Zaturrahmi, Z., Festiyed, F., & Ellizar, E. (2020). The Utilization of Virtual Laboratory in Learning: A Meta-Analysis. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 228–236.

Zhang, M. (2014). Who are interested in online science simulations? Tracking a trend of digital divide in Internet use. Computers & Education, 76, 205–214.




How to Cite

Verawati, N. N. S. P., Handriani, L. S., & Prahani, B. K. (2022). The Experimental Experience of Motion Kinematics in Biology Class Using PhET Virtual Simulation and Its Impact on Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 1(1), 11–17.



Original Research Article