Development of Case-Based Learning Device with Cognitive Conflict Strategies to Improve the Critical Thinking Ability of Prospective Teacher Students

Authors

  • Muhammad Yusril Yusup University of Mataram
  • Ahmad Harjono University of Mataram
  • Muh Makhrus University of Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v3i2.1792

Keywords:

Case-Based Learning, Cognitive conflict strategies, Learning device, Critical thinking

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and evaluate a Case-Based Learning (CBL) device incorporating cognitive conflict strategies to enhance the critical thinking abilities of prospective teacher students, a response to the global competitiveness challenge faced by Indonesian education. Through a methodological lens of research and development, the study meticulously validated a suite of educational devices, including lesson plans, student worksheets, teaching materials, and instruments designed to test critical thinking abilities. Additionally, the research scrutinized the practicality of these devices in actual classroom settings, ensuring their applicability in real-world educational environments. The findings from this comprehensive analysis revealed that the CBL device not only met the criteria for validity and reliability but also demonstrated significant practicality, as evidenced by its seamless integration and consistent application in classroom scenarios. A pivotal aspect of the study was the quantifiable enhancement in the critical thinking capabilities of the students involved, which was rigorously assessed through pretest and posttest measures. These assessments, underpinned by substantial effect sizes obtained via paired t-test analyses, highlighted a marked improvement in the critical thinking skills of the prospective teachers. The empirical evidence garnered through this research underscores the transformative potential of the CBL device, advocating for its widespread adoption in teacher education programs. The study posits that such an innovative educational device is quintessential for equipping future educators with the necessary skills to navigate and contribute effectively to the 21st-century educational landscape, thereby responding adeptly to the evolving demands of global educational competitiveness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aarto-Pesonen, L., & Piirainen, A. (2020). Teacher students’ meaningful learning in widening learning worlds. Teaching Education, 31(3), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2018.1561662

Almazroa, H., & Alotaibi, W. (2023). Teaching 21st Century Skills: Understanding the Depth and Width of the Challenges to Shape Proactive Teacher Education Programmes. Sustainability, 15(9), 7365. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097365

Anggoro, S., Widodo, A., Suhandi, A., & Treagust, D. F. (2019). Using a Discrepant Event to Facilitate Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Conceptual Change about Force and Motion. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(8), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/105275

Borich, G. D. (2016). Observation Skills for Effective Teaching (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315633206

Çam, A., & Geban, Ö. (2017). Effectiveness of case-based learning instruction on pre-service teachers’ chemistry motivation and attitudes toward chemistry. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(1), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2016.1248927

Carder, L., Willingham, P., & Bibb, D. (2001). Case-based, problem-based learning: Information literacy for the real world. Research Strategies, 18(3), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-3310(02)00087-3

De Vries, J., Feskens, R., Keuning, J., & Van Der Kleij, F. (2022). Comparability of Feedback in PISA 2015 across Culturally Diverse Countries. Education Sciences, 12(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020145

Dewi, C. A., & Rahayu, S. (2023). Implementation of case-based learning in science education: A systematic review. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.041

Dreyfus, A., Jungwirth, E., & Eliovitch, R. (1990). Applying the “cognitive conflict” strategy for conceptual change—Some implications, difficulties, and problems. Science Education, 74(5), 555–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730740506

Ennis, R. (2018). Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum: A Vision. Topoi, 37(1), Article 1.

Evendi, E., Kusaeri, A. K. A., Pardi, M. H. H., Sucipto, L., Bayani, F., & Prayogi, S. (2022). Assessing students’ critical thinking skills viewed from cognitive style: Study on implementation of problem-based e-learning model in mathematics courses. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(7), em2129. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12161

Faiza, L., & Wulandari, F. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Case Based Learn?ng (CBL) Terhadap Kemampuan L?teras? Sa?ns. Jurnal Elementaria Edukasia, 6(3), 1311–1324. https://doi.org/10.31949/jee.v6i3.6081

Farrés-Tarafa, M., Roldán-Merino, J., Lorenzo-Seva, U., Hurtado-Pardos, B., Biurrun-Garrido, A., Molina-Raya, L., Morera-Pomarede, M.-J., Bande, D., Raurell-Torredà, M., & Casas, I. (2020). Reliability and validity study of the Spanish adaptation of the “Educational Practices Questionnaire” (EPQ). PLOS ONE, 15(9), e0239014. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239014

Fitriani, H., Samsuri, T., Rachmadiarti, F., Raharjo, R., & Mantlana, C. D. (2022). Development of Evaluative-Process Learning Tools Integrated with Conceptual-Problem-Based Learning Models: Study of Its Validity and Effectiveness to Train Critical Thinking. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v1i1.736

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational Research: An Introduction (8th Edition). Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/content/one-dot-com/one-dot-com/us/en/higher-education/product.html

Hake, R., R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. Indiana University: Woodland Hills, CA - USA.

Herpiana, R., & Rosidin, U. (2018). Development of instrument for assessing students’ critical and creative thinking ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948, 012054. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012054

Horn, S., & Veermans, K. (2019). Critical thinking efficacy and transfer skills defend against ‘fake news’ at an international school in Finland. Journal of Research in International Education, 18(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240919830003

Lee, G., Kwon, J., Park, S.-S., Kim, J.-W., Kwon, H.-G., & Park, H.-K. (2003). Development of an instrument for measuring cognitive conflict in secondary-level science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10099

Limón, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11(4–5), 357–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00037-2

Magwilang, E. B. (2022). Case-Based Instruction in the Forensic Chemistry Classroom: Effects on Students’ Motivation and Achievement. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(3), 396–414. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.3.21

Nair, S. P. (2013). Case Based Learning: A Method for Better Understanding of Biochemistry in Medical Students. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2013/5795.3212

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en

Prayogi, S., & Verawati, N. N. S. P. (2020). The Effect of Conflict Cognitive Strategy in Inquiry-based Learning on Preservice Teachers’ Critical Thinking Ability. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal), 21, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2020-021-pray

Prayogi, S., Yuanita, L., & Wasis. (2018). Critical Inquiry Based Learning: A Model of Learning to Promote Critical Thinking Among Prospective Teachers of Physic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(1), Article 1.

Semmelroth, C. L., & Johnson, E. (2014). Measuring Rater Reliability on a Special Education Observation Tool. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 39(3), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508413511488

Ubaidah, N., & Aminudin, M. (2019). Development of learning tools: Learning constructivist mathematics to improve creative thinking ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188, 012071. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012071

van Peppen, L. M., van Gog, T., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., & Alexander, P. A. (2021). Identifying obstacles to transfer of critical thinking skills. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 0(0), Article 0. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2021.1990302

Verawati, N. N. S. P., Prayogi, S., Gummah, S., Muliadi, A., & Yusup, M. Y. (2019). The Effect of Conflict-Cognitive Strategy in Inquiry Learning towards Pre-Service Teachers' Critical Thinking Ability. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i4.21002

Vosniadou, S., & Ioannides, C. (1998). From conceptual development to science education: A psychological point of view. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1213–1230. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980201004

Waxer, M., & Morton, J. B. (2012). Cognitive Conflict and Learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 585–587). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_280

Yustina, E., . S., & . S. (2020). Validity of Learning Tools with Peer Tutor Model in Improving Student Learning Outcomes and Self Efficacy. Journal of Advances in Education and Philosophy, 04(03), 90–94. https://doi.org/10.36348/jaep.2020.v04i03.003

Zumbach, J., Ortler, C., Deibl, I., & Moser, S. (2020). Using Prompts to Scaffold Metacognition in Case-Based Problem Solving within the Domain of Attribution Theory. Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.24313/jpbl.2020.00206

Downloads

Published

2024-05-03

How to Cite

Yusup, M. Y., Harjono, A., & Makhrus, M. (2024). Development of Case-Based Learning Device with Cognitive Conflict Strategies to Improve the Critical Thinking Ability of Prospective Teacher Students. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 3(2), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v3i2.1792

Issue

Section

Original Research Article

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.