When Inquiry Isn’t Enough: Why Structured Reflection Can Strengthen Preservice Science Teachers’ Critical Thinking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/waxp5a03Keywords:
Scientific inquiry, Structured reflection, Preservice science teachers, Critical thinking skills, Performance evaluationAbstract
Inquiry-based learning is frequently treated as a ready-made route to critical thinking, but classroom inquiry often becomes procedural unless students are pushed to examine assumptions, justify claims, and revise interpretations. This commentary discusses the focal study “Emphasizing reflective processes in scientific inquiry and its impact on preservice science teachers’ critical thinking skills” and argues that its strongest contribution is showing how structured reflective elements can turn inquiry activities into repeated practice in reasoning. At the same time, the evidence should be read carefully: the gains are very large, and the intervention bundles several supports (anomalies, monitoring worksheets, prompts, and feedback) that may each contribute. We outline alternative explanations, identify what the study clarifies and what it does not yet prove, and offer implications for future research designs and teacher-education practice.
References
Akmam, A., Anshari, R., Amir, H., Jalinus, N., & Amran, A. (2018). Influence of Learning Strategy of Cognitive Conflict on Student Misconception in Computational Physics Course. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 335, 012074. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/335/1/012074
Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021017
Bezanilla, M. J., Fernández-Nogueira, D., Poblete, M., & Galindo-Domínguez, H. (2019). Methodologies for teaching-learning critical thinking in higher education: The teacher’s view. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100584
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chan, P. (2022). An Empirical Study on Data Validation Methods of Delphi and General Consensus. Data, 7(2), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/data7020018
Choy, S. C., Yim, J. S. C., & Tan, P. L. (2017). Reflective thinking among preservice teachers: A Malaysian perspective. Issues in Educational Research, 27(2), 234–251.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. D.C. Heath.
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004
Emmer, E. T., & Millett, G. B. (1970). Improving teaching through experimentation: A laboratory approach. Prentice-Hall.
Ennis, R. H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews201126214
Ennis, R. (2018). Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum: A Vision. Topoi, 37(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4
Facione, P. A. (2020). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Measured Reasons LLC.
Fitriani, H., Asy’ari, M., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2019). Exploring the Prospective Teachers’ Critical Thinking and Critical Analysis Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(3), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i3.19434
Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206
Guo, L. (2022). How should reflection be supported in higher education? — A meta-analysis of reflection interventions. Reflective Practice, 23(1), 118–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2021.1995856
Körkkö, M., Kyrö-Ämmälä, O., & Turunen, T. (2016). Professional development through reflection in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.014
Larrivee, B. (2008). Development of a tool to assess teachers’ level of reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 9(3), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940802207451
Lederman, N. G., & Abell, S. K. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of Research on Science Education, Volume II. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097267
Lee, N. Y., Wang, Z., & Lim, B. (2021). The development of critical thinking: What university students have to say. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(1), 286–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1973412
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Durik, A. M., Conley, A. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Karabenick, S. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Measuring Situational Interest in Academic Domains. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4), 647–671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355699
Loughran, J. J. (2002). Effective Reflective Practice: In Search of Meaning in Learning about Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053001004
Mäeots, M., Siiman, L., Kori, K., & Pedaste, M. (2016). Relation Between Students’ Reflection Levels and Their Inquiry Learning Outcomes. EDULEARN Proceedings, 5558–5564. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2016.2324
Miri, B., David, B.-C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely Teaching for the Promotion of Higher-order Thinking Skills: A Case of Critical Thinking. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9029-2
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Leijen, Ä., & Sarapuu, T. (2012). Improving Students’ Inquiry Skills through Reflection and Self-Regulation Scaffolds. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 9, 81–95.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Prayogi, S., Muhali, M., Yuliyanti, S., Asy’ari, M., Azmi, I., & Verawati, N. N. S. P. (2019). The Effect of Presenting Anomalous Data on Improving Student’s Critical Thinking Ability. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(6), 133–137. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i06.9717
Prayogi, S., Verawati, N. N. S. P., Bilad, M. R., Samsuri, T., Hunepi, H., Asy’ari, M., Yusup, M. Y., Azmi, I. & Ernita, N. (2025). Emphasizing reflective processes in scientific inquiry and its impact on preservice science teachers’ critical thinking skills. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101895
Procter, L. (2020). Fostering critically reflective thinking with first-year university students: Early thoughts on implementing a reflective assessment task. Reflective Practice, 21(4), 444–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2020.1773421
Qing, Z., Jing, G., & Yan, W. (2010). Promoting preservice teachers’ critical thinking skills by inquiry-based chemical experiment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4597–4603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.737
Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining Reflection: Another Look at John Dewey and Reflective Thinking. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00181
Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. Temple Smith.
Uiterwijk-Luijk, L., Krüger, M., Zijlstra, B., & Volman, M. (2019). Teachers’ role in stimulating students’ inquiry habit of mind in primary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102894
Vogt, F., & Schmiemann, P. (2020). Assessing Biology Pre-Service Teachers’ Professional Vision of Teaching Scientific Inquiry. Education Sciences, 10(11), 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110332
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ni Nyoman Sri Putu Verawati, Wahyudi Wahyudi, Nina Nisrina

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

